Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: Carbon Fiber Body Parts???

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    134

    Question Carbon Fiber Body Parts???

    Could someone chime in on how the rules view te use of either carbon fiber or fiberglass body parts on an Improved Touring car. I understand they can not be used but I'm looking for written words.

    Thanks,
    Efrain N Alers
    Nativo Performance
    787-635-9546
    https://improvedtouring.coms/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=12013&dateline=120412  5665

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AE86ITA View Post
    Could someone chime in on how the rules view te use of either carbon fiber or fiberglass body parts on an Improved Touring car.
    They don't, therefore they're not allowed.

    Read the beginning of the IT regs; it states something along the lines of "no changes are allowed unless specifically allowed", or in the vernacular 'if it doesn't say you can, then you cannot'.

    IIDSYCTYC.

    - GA

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Port St. Lucie, FL
    Posts
    354

    Default

    You won't find any reference to carbon fiber or fiberglass body work under the IT rules, therefore they cannot be used. If it doesn't say you can do it, then you must assume you cannot.
    Chris Carey

    Central Florida Region
    ITS/Vintage Datsun 240Z

    Favorite tool to remove undercoating---- A curb!

    "Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
    Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    451

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AE86ITA View Post
    Could someone chime in on how the rules view te use of either carbon fiber or fiberglass body parts on an Improved Touring car. I understand they can not be used but I'm looking for written words.

    Thanks,
    Words. Lots and lots of written words: http://www.scca.com/clubracing/content.cfm?cid=44472

    In particular, the General Competition Rules, up-to-date through September: http://www.scca.com/assets/2013%20GCR%20September.pdf
    -----------------------
    Jarrod Igou
    ITR/STU BMW 325i, #92
    Des Moines Valley Region

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    134

    Default

    Guys; normally people locally ask me for rules interpretation due to either language barrier or lack of time so I understand, the thing is We've been trying to show new competitors what the rules are and then there're some that just need to see it in writing.


    Thanks,
    Last edited by AE86ITA; 10-23-2013 at 02:23 PM.
    Efrain N Alers
    Nativo Performance
    787-635-9546
    https://improvedtouring.coms/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=12013&dateline=120412  5665

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AE86ITA View Post
    ...there're some that just need to see it in writing.
    It *is* in writing, at the very beginning of the IT regs. Just look in the opening paragraphs where it says you can only do what is specifically allowed within the regs.

    You will not find a reg that says you "can't" do specific things, let along carbon fiber body panel. It is physically and metaphorically impossible to list out all the things you cannot do. Instead, the regs instead turn it around and say you can't do ANYTHING unless we say in here that you can. And nowhere in there does it say you can do carbon fiber body panels.

    - GA

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    raymond NH
    Posts
    623

    Default

    As I understand, through years of trial and error, what Greg is saying. Lets not get snippy here.

    The Original poster asked where it was written. Its not. We all know what NOT written means. BUT when you are talking to a new member/builder of a car, he/she sometimes needs it to say You Cannot Use XXX as well as you CAN use YYY.

    Ive been on both sides of this as recently as this season. Its real easy when talking to someone who May come to a race, to hear that statement. It doesn't say I cant run it, its a race car why cant I run it. The tough part is keeping them interested after that conversation and they find out they need to scrap the ENTIRE Itchy Zoomy Body kit they just had painted to match the roll cage, and install stock(shudder) fenders.

    Just my 2 cents

    This again goes to the graying of the club. Kids like flashy cars, as well as engine mods.
    Last edited by Dano77; 10-23-2013 at 04:23 PM.
    All posts are made by a fat old guy with a crappy old car that isnt supported by a factory anymore and therefore should not be taken seriously, EVER

    We buy our tires at WalMart 205/50-15 NT-01 $148.00 last all season and go faster as they wear out........

    Driver Skills Development, 7's Racing Skunk Works
    it7racing.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    743

    Default

    Holy poop! Dan's bein' reasonable.
    Ed Funk
    NER ITA CRX, ITB Civic, ITC CRX (wanna buy a Honda?)
    Smart as a horse, hung like Einstein!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Kinda - what that says to me is that 'they' have a cursory knowledge of the rules but not a full understanding. The IT rules are realatively simple. They state in the very beginning that the only allowances that are legal are what is in the rules. Nothing else.

    Hence:

    "If it doesn't say you can, then you can't"

    IIDSYCTYC.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Somewhere in Upstate New York
    Posts
    1,033

    Default

    I've got a mold underway for a carbon fiber washer bottle.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dano77 View Post
    This again goes to the graying of the club. Kids like flashy cars, as well as engine mods.
    But we do have classes for all that...just not IT. Also, I'm not sure the original question has as much to do with the graying of the club as the fact that the younger generations don't seem to have the desire/patience/willingness to spend a little time researching rules before they go out and make a bunch of modifications to their cars.
    Earl R.
    240SX
    ITA/ST5

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    ^ we have a winner.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    raymond NH
    Posts
    623

    Default

    What Earl said. Guess I just said it wrong.
    All posts are made by a fat old guy with a crappy old car that isnt supported by a factory anymore and therefore should not be taken seriously, EVER

    We buy our tires at WalMart 205/50-15 NT-01 $148.00 last all season and go faster as they wear out........

    Driver Skills Development, 7's Racing Skunk Works
    it7racing.com

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston-ish
    Posts
    932

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erlrich View Post
    But we do have classes for all that...just not IT. Also, I'm not sure the original question has as much to do with the graying of the club as the fact that the younger generations don't seem to have the desire/patience/willingness to spend a little time researching rules before they go out and make a bunch of modifications to their cars.
    Or that they've been modifying their car for years to make it what they want, and NOW they've decided they want to race the car and are trying to find a place to play.

    that's the whole reason I landed in STU. I started building a car the way I wanted for HPDEs and AutoX about 8 years ago. when I decided I had the skills and finances to race wheel-to-wheel, the only SCCA class that my car fit in was STU and even then I had to remove several cheap mods (suspension links) that really make the car handle better and eat less tire.

    The club-as a whole- seems incredibly adverse to "tuner parts" like big brakes, adjustable suspension links, and fiberglass bodywork.. Other sanctioning bodies welcome these people with open arms, while the scotch-drinking greyhairs are pouring through the rulebook trying to come up with a reason they can't be on track at the same time as their 1967 LeakingBritishDeathTrap.
    Houston Region
    STU Nissan 240SX
    EProd RX7

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colchester, CT, USA
    Posts
    2,120

    Default

    You guys all have to admit, the IT rules arent the easiest to interpret. When I built my first car I read the rules over and over before I felt confident that I had captured the nuances. I didnt have anyone to turn to to ask questions and still managed to screw some things up.........

    Then again, I'm not one of the sharpest tools in the shed.............


    I guess I'll have to strip the neon lights out from underneith my car............
    Jeff L

    ITA Miata



    2010 NARRC Champion

    2007 NERRC Championship, 2nd place
    2008 NARRC Championship, 2nd place
    2009 NARRC Championship, 2nd place

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    and we REALLY are talking about an Island here. PR Region does not have the luxury of being able to drive out to the nearest track on the weekend and talk to the guys who are already running SCCA. they are building a new group with our existing rules and without our paradigms. and they have an established culture built from badass old Toyotas, Nissans, Mazdas, and Hondas that really doesn't fit into our club well, even if the nameplates do.

    and yes, our rules are complicated because they've grown and evolved to answer the problems they have encountered over the years, where new people come to them without our cultural understanding, just wanting to hit the track with a "cool" car. I get the same sort of reactions at HPDEs that we are hearing here. "why wouldn't you put on composite fenders, add turbo, bolt in JDM/EDM/better USDM known to be awesome motor, pull the headlight for cold air, add a wing, add a body kit, open the grille up, go big on the wheels, go big on the brakes, etc..."

    some of this stuff we know to be useless or negative improvement on track (i.e. useless bling or form over function), others just fall outside of the ability to establish parity or regulations to govern fairly via a rulebook and a bunch of disconnected volunteers, some of it is purely "that's not how we do it". we don't want to add classes, and we were overly conservative with ST to a degree , IMHO (though it is the closest thing to the droid they are looking for). so the kids sit there scratching their heads wonder WTF this SCCA thing is all about.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Chip's right here. Efrain is just trying to get our help in explaining to people who might not be able to read the English written word, what the rules are.

    Lets face it, everywhere we go, we are faced with rules the limit our behavior. No parking. No smoking, No right turn on red, etc etc etc. So, to the average person, it's odd to encounter rules based on allowances only, with everything NOT mentioned being "don't touch".
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Weare, NH
    Posts
    483

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip42 View Post
    ...PR Region...are building a new group with our existing rules and without our paradigms....[STU and STL] is the closest thing to the droid they are looking for)... so the kids sit there scratching their heads wonder WTF this SCCA [IMPROVED TOURING] thing is all about.
    +1

    Efrain ... why don't you champion the development of a healthy STL and STU population, which is closer to what the entering participants already have and understand, rather than trying to get them to "undo racing improvements" to fit the Improved Touring ruleset?

    .

    Glenn Lawton
    GSMmotorsports
    #14 ITS RX7
    NARRC ITS Champion 2012
    NERRC ITS Champion 2013 12 11 10 09 08
    NERRC STU Champion 2010

    __________________

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lateapex911 View Post
    Chip's right here. Efrain is just trying to get our help in explaining to people who might not be able to read the English written word, what the rules are.
    So how is reading those rules to someone on the Internet - using written English - going to resolve that...? Are you implying that people on this forum are better at reading the regs to someone than them reading it themselves?

    The difference here is not because of gray hair or because of geography or because of language, the difference here is regulated competition versus anarchical, pseudo-competition HPDE/street "racing". I'll wager a dollar to a donut that everyone that has "issues" with the regs came into them with a pre-disposed mindset (e.g., Jeff Lawton with his roundy-round and PCA background; our guys in PR with existing cars).

    The IT regs are really not that hard to read. They may be frustrating to someone wanting to race a car with existing specific mods, but I think they're pretty damn well-written, especially if you read them for what they say ('ok, what can I do here?'), not skim them looking for what you want them to say ('OK, I've got CF fenders, where can I do that?'). The issue here is a mindset, not a problem of verbiage. It's a difference of "hey, I built this really awesome car for the street and now I want to take it racing" versus "I want to go racing, what kind of car do I need to build?"

    Unless you get to someone early in their participation curve, it's the mindset you need to attack, not the regs or the mods already on the car. And the absolute core of the ITCS mindset is IIDSYCTYC.

    Get that in your noggin and everything else falls right into place.

    - GA

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    and I think this forum is doing Efrain's efforts in the PRR a service if we help make that clear to him, so that he might make it clear to them.

    I say again, the guys out there don't have the existing culture to help them get into the rules and philosophy. They DO have a bunch of existing cars built around some common themes - SCCA didn't get in there early enough - too busy out in California with GIs and used airstrips, I guess. we have similar stuff on the continent but we also have a long tradition of SCCA and established groups to help attract and coach new people.

    They are reading a somewhat anachronistic rulebook with English as a second language. you already understand the IIDSYCYC concept. it's good to point it out. let Efrain carry that back to the rest of the group and see what they come back with. the worst thing we can do as SCCA members is get grumpy with or frustrated by outsiders looking in and asking questions that seem reasonable from their perspective.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •