Results 1 to 20 of 115

Thread: Prep Differences Between SM and ITx

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Chaos View Post
    Maybe I just wasn’t taking advantage of the rules in IT when I ran an ITA Miata, but my impression is that a built SM motor does not comply with IT rules:

    Spec Miata 9.1.7.1.h.2
    A valve job will consist of only three flat angles; radius cuts are not allowed. A 45 degree seat angle must be used, which may vary in width from .030 inch to .050 inch. To narrow or correctly position the face angle, a bottom angle of 70 degrees must be used. To narrow or correctly position the face angle, a top cut of 30 degrees may be used. All angles must stay on the cast steel block portion of the seat. The angles must not extend off the seat into the aluminum casting at the top or bottom of the seat.

    And have someone who has built a full-on IT car read through 9.1.7.1.f (cylinder head). I never was sure about SM’s unshrouding of valves meeting IT rules, or the reference to plunge cutting in 9.1.7.1.f.3.
    Me thinking if IT allowance for "balance and blueprint" in combination of allowable engine tolerances as define in the factory manual applies here. but don't know...
    Last edited by mossaidis; 06-06-2013 at 05:17 PM.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •