Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 115

Thread: Prep Differences Between SM and ITx

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default Prep Differences Between SM and ITx

    Can someone detail for me what is allowed in Spec Miata that is not allowed in Improved Touring? In other words, what is it about a fully-prepped '99+ SM that is not compliant to ITS? Or what about a '90 or '95 SM that is not compliant for ITA?

    For background, I'm asking for Scrutineering purposes in Super Touring Light. There's a lot of confusion - and outright cheating - that is causing some consternation among scrutineers.

    I'd make a personal comment about "leave it to the Spec Miata crowd to f**k up a good thing" but I won't...

    - GA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    743

    Default

    You are the very epitome of restraint.
    Ed Funk
    NER ITA CRX, ITB Civic, ITC CRX (wanna buy a Honda?)
    Smart as a horse, hung like Einstein!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Mainly power steering rack. SM allows one to de-power the rack. The cars were available with manual racks but 99% are de-powered, mainly because manual racks are hard to find and can only be purchases new(new 99' manual rack is $580.)

    On 1990-1993 or 1.6 cars, SM rules allow the later torsen dif. but it also is not IT complient.

    SSM rules do not require a kill switch
    Jerry
    NER South

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    rear diff carrier and some allowed suspension (brake?) component swaps between years with same body but different engine is a big SM allowance difference from IT. SM has to maintain more stock components and only recently was allowed over-bores and the like and then only with added weight.

    you see a fair amount of double dipper SM guys in IT who are in breach of IT rules. I'm sure you see the same in ST. ST requires one hell of a scrutineer.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    I believe SM folks swap transmissions beyond the spec line years listed in IT. Jerry - please confirm.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mossaidis View Post
    I believe SM folks swap transmissions beyond the spec line years listed in IT. Jerry - please confirm.
    although its possible, there really is no difference, gear ratios are all the same...
    how would you know if a 142 Volvo or Opel GT has the original gear box???
    Jerry
    NER South

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    I guess tranny codes. I know there's the rules and there's cheatin. Doesn't sound like trannies swapped out of an 90 into 98 or vice versa is cheatin'.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    I would think that the 99+ SM's are running SM weight and taking out their RP's...keeping them legal for ITS. No allowances for those cars that would be illegal in ITS come to mind except ride height, but that applies to all three versions (1.6, 1.8 and 1.8 99+).

    I can't think of anything for the 1.8's that would be illegal for ITA either except the mentioned de-powered steering rack for all years.

    The 1.6 is a different issue. Conversion to the 94-05 diff assembly is legal in SM but not in IT as has been stated too, but they probably have the 4.3 gear in there per the SM rules, not that it matters.

    Why types of issues are we seeing that are resulting in problems? As long as they are running IT weights, the cars are certainly not more potent.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Pulling the RP and running SM weigh on a 99', without a manual rack, that's the problem, it's not SM or ITS.
    Jerry
    NER South

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    Isn't the manual rack better in these cars?
    Dave Gran
    Real Roads, Real Car Guys – Real World Road Tests
    Go Ahead - Take the Wheel's Free Guide to Racing

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    raymond NH
    Posts
    623

    Default

    De powering is legal and cheap. I dont recall the manual rack being 580.00 faster than the power rack.

    But im a cheap IT7 driver.
    All posts are made by a fat old guy with a crappy old car that isnt supported by a factory anymore and therefore should not be taken seriously, EVER

    We buy our tires at WalMart 205/50-15 NT-01 $148.00 last all season and go faster as they wear out........

    Driver Skills Development, 7's Racing Skunk Works
    it7racing.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    472

    Default

    99' manual racks are rare used....
    New they are about $400. plus core charge of $150.
    They don't take a core unless its a manual :-( and Mazdaspeed won't take the core, you need to find a deal willing to take it back.......
    Jerry
    NER South

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    Why types of issues are we seeing that are resulting in problems?
    I don't want to get into the details, but it's a combination of regs ignorance (in the true sense of the word, not intended to be derogatory) and willful intent. As Chip noted, you almost need to be a rocket scientist to figure out the allowance matrix, and you need to be 100% on top of the regs of three separate categories - one Regional Only - to ensure you've got it right. And, some folks are taking advantage of that by intentionally trying to mix-n-match regs, with the intent to maximize performance to collect contingencies and points in the Majors events.

    My goal is to produce an at-a-glance matrix so that the competitors will be able to efficiently decide what config to run, and for the scrutineers to efficiently tech the cars' configuration. In addition, I'm going to ask the CRB to require STL competitors that are not running to STL-specific prep to declare, on the side of their cars, what config they're prepped to.

    STL has, without a doubt, benefited from explicit inclusion of other classes into its folds. I just want to ensure that this inclusion does not end up alienating other competitors from joining in. Come in clean and you are most welcome to join us; come in trying to cheat and piss all over the class and I'm gonna be busy writing a lot of paper...

    - GA

  14. #14

    Default

    Maybe I just wasn’t taking advantage of the rules in IT when I ran an ITA Miata, but my impression is that a built SM motor does not comply with IT rules:

    Spec Miata 9.1.7.1.h.2
    A valve job will consist of only three flat angles; radius cuts are not allowed. A 45 degree seat angle must be used, which may vary in width from .030 inch to .050 inch. To narrow or correctly position the face angle, a bottom angle of 70 degrees must be used. To narrow or correctly position the face angle, a top cut of 30 degrees may be used. All angles must stay on the cast steel block portion of the seat. The angles must not extend off the seat into the aluminum casting at the top or bottom of the seat.

    And have someone who has built a full-on IT car read through 9.1.7.1.f (cylinder head). I never was sure about SM’s unshrouding of valves meeting IT rules, or the reference to plunge cutting in 9.1.7.1.f.3.
    EP 1990 Mazda RX-7 (used to be STU until the turbo cars scared me away, and STL rotary cars require too much ballast)
    ITS/T4 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ner88 View Post
    Pulling the RP and running SM weigh on a 99', without a manual rack, that's the problem, it's not SM or ITS.
    I think that happened to 99 SM cars somewhere around my garage all weekend last NHMS event. Guys were pulling RP off their 99 SM to run ITS... and doing nothing else. (shrug)
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Chaos View Post
    Maybe I just wasn’t taking advantage of the rules in IT when I ran an ITA Miata, but my impression is that a built SM motor does not comply with IT rules:

    Spec Miata 9.1.7.1.h.2
    A valve job will consist of only three flat angles; radius cuts are not allowed. A 45 degree seat angle must be used, which may vary in width from .030 inch to .050 inch. To narrow or correctly position the face angle, a bottom angle of 70 degrees must be used. To narrow or correctly position the face angle, a top cut of 30 degrees may be used. All angles must stay on the cast steel block portion of the seat. The angles must not extend off the seat into the aluminum casting at the top or bottom of the seat.

    And have someone who has built a full-on IT car read through 9.1.7.1.f (cylinder head). I never was sure about SM’s unshrouding of valves meeting IT rules, or the reference to plunge cutting in 9.1.7.1.f.3.
    Me thinking if IT allowance for "balance and blueprint" in combination of allowable engine tolerances as define in the factory manual applies here. but don't know...
    Last edited by mossaidis; 06-06-2013 at 05:17 PM.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Arlington, VA USA
    Posts
    515

    Default

    In addition to the diff housing & steering rack stuff mentioned previously...

    9.1.7.1.p.8 -- Honk..honk.. (but at least the washer bottle can go)
    9.1.7.4.c -- Updating subframe braces to those from a '97. That wouldn't be legal for a 1.6l
    9.1.7.4.l -- Strut brace not allowed for 99+'s in SM (allowed in IT)
    9.1.7.6.a -- Not limited to 13+lbs/wheel in IT
    9.1.7.8.d -- IT not limited to OEM door mirrors and restricted location as in SM rules
    Gregg Ginsberg
    '96 Civic EX -- MARRS ITA #72
    WDCR-SCCA Rookie of the Year 2003
    MARRS ITA/T3 Drivers rep

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Looks like 18 of the 22 cars entered on STL for the June Sprints are miatae.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mossaidis View Post
    I think that happened to 99 SM cars somewhere around my garage all weekend last NHMS event. Guys were pulling RP off their 99 SM to run ITS... and doing nothing else. (shrug)
    This is totally legal for ITS.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    This is totally legal for ITS.
    Thanks Andy. So min weights are fine then.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •