Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: The Turbo problem in STU

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Sorry Greg,

    I don't understand how SRF results are pertinent....

    Eric was T-boned on the pace lap of Sunday's race and was DNS.

    I think his point is that even with the tire and TIR changes we're looking at a repeat of last years Runoffs results.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockaway, NJ
    Posts
    1,548

    Default

    Greg fat fingered the link - times looked comparable...

    That so blows- wrecked on the pace lap??? How
    BenSpeed
    #33 ITR Porsche 968
    BigSpeed Racing
    2013 ITR Pro IT Champion
    2014 NE Division ITR Champion

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    According to his Facebook post, the pace car bunched the field up, to slow the start down. He says it cracked the welds on the x-bar, and maxed his g-meter out at 5.6g latteral.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Z3_GoCar View Post
    I don't understand how SRF results are pertinent....
    Corrected.

    Quote Originally Posted by benspeed View Post
    Greg fat fingered the link - times looked comparable...
    0.7s fast lap difference across the weekend.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Weare, NH
    Posts
    483

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    Eric, didn't you have the pole, led flag-to-flag, and then the win on Saturday before you got wrecked out on Sunday...? In your non-turbo BMW E30?

    Eric I don't see the data behind your argument... it seems as if you are saying
    that the turbo Solstices should be slowed down because they have some possibility of catching you?



    Is there some way you can build a bridge for me from Saturday's race data
    to your conclusion? Because I don't see it.

    .

    Glenn Lawton
    GSMmotorsports
    #14 ITS RX7
    NARRC ITS Champion 2012
    NERRC ITS Champion 2013 12 11 10 09 08
    NERRC STU Champion 2010

    __________________

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    192

    Default

    As a committee member nI should have put more thought into it before posting the letter I sent to the CRB to a public forum, so i am taking it down.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockaway, NJ
    Posts
    1,548

    Default

    Eric - no worries about the letter. While the data from the Ohio race didn't back up your argument I tend to agree that STU is going to be a turbo class. The turbos walked the field at the Runoffs and I think will smoke the field at any big fast tracks like WGI.

    I know I'd put. 944 2.5 turbo in the 968 if I was capable of funding an STU car.
    BenSpeed
    #33 ITR Porsche 968
    BigSpeed Racing
    2013 ITR Pro IT Champion
    2014 NE Division ITR Champion

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    FI's still smoking the field... any plans to address this for next year? Laguna Seca may be a smaller track, but all the major straights are up hill, and some are pretty steep, so power to weight imballances will show up in a big way.

    Maybe I should be asking, if STU is even going to be around next season. With only seven cars at the run-offs it seems doomed just like STO was two years ago.
    Last edited by Z3_GoCar; 09-22-2013 at 11:43 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •