Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
The "writing a rule to prevent something specific" trap. I believe that's Ad Hoc committee standard error 37.1...?



K
Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
Aye-yup.
Quote Originally Posted by dhrmx5 View Post
What makes the rule ambigous is somehow the words "for the installed engine" got left off of the TB limitation.

Therefore, the BMW in question would not have the option (assuming 6cyl) of using the ITBs from an engine that is not allowed in STU, even though it came in his chassis at some point in time.

I will submit a letter to get this clarified
Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
Good call, D.
Greg, you really flip-flopped on that one....

Actually, even if you add that it still presents a problem. What if you're starting out with a car from a smaller displacement and going larger. Then you're limiting the car to what came with it on the smaller displacement class. Just take Kirk's advice and scrap this rules abomination.