Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 118

Thread: Escort GT/LXE to ITB?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Southfield, MI
    Posts
    564

    Default Escort GT/LXE to ITB?

    There's been so many changes to ITA in the last few years I finally see it as time to ask for the ITA Escort GT/LXE to be dropped to ITB. I just wrote the request to the CRB.

    I'll flesh it out a little here. Support it if you see fit and write to the CRB.

    Escort GTs have never been competitive in ITA, that's a given, but competitiveness isn't guaranteed it IT, we all know that. "The Process" has done A LOT to even things out and give more cars chances. "The process" did revise (lower) the weight of the Escort a couple years back. However, the new weight isn't achievable. 2325 for a car that weighs 2500 without driver is too low. It's an early 90's grocery getter that just doesn't have a lot of weight to pull out. The later cars, '94-'96, did have airbags, but they were even heavier. Add in the newer classifications to ITA and it's really a dog. A lot of the cars that Escorts did run with in ITA have been moved to ITB.

    There are Mazda Proteges in both ITA and ITB with the same engine and same or similar platforms. I'm not familiar with the Proteges, but I suspect they are lighter. That's true of other Mazda/Ford twins, the Mazda version are lighter. The ITA classified cars are all at 2325 and the ITB car is at 2645. I think an ITB Escort GT at around 2600 pounds make sense. Have to put a little weight back in, but it should give it a better shot to be competitive.

    Yes, I have one for sale. A friend of mine wants it, and I'd still work on it. Probably even drive it now and again. If I let him buy it. Just had to throw that in, should anyone question my motives.
    Last edited by tderonne; 09-12-2012 at 12:16 PM.
    Tim

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colchester, CT, USA
    Posts
    2,120

    Default

    I am FAR from an Escort expert, only that I have raced against them. But doesn't the GT have the same engine as the 1.8 Miata? The performance gains out of that engine are way too much for ITB.......... no matter how much weight you throw at it.
    Jeff L

    ITA Miata



    2010 NARRC Champion

    2007 NERRC Championship, 2nd place
    2008 NARRC Championship, 2nd place
    2009 NARRC Championship, 2nd place

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Southfield, MI
    Posts
    564

    Default

    It is a lot like the 1.8 Miata engine. But different cams, different intake manifold, different... It actually has the 1.6 Miata airmeter, which is limits airflow on the 1.6 Miata. And there is already a 1.8 Protege IN ITB, that ship has sailed.

    Good input though, thanks.
    Tim

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    521

    Default

    Jeff

    I am FAR from an Escort expert, only that I have raced against them. But doesn't the GT have the same engine as the 1.8 Miata?
    This may be like saying that the MR2 has the same engine as Formula Atlantic There are a lot of performance enhancing / performance inhibiting factors beyond the basic iron.

    Terry (with absolutely no Escort expertise)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Terry Hanushek View Post


    Terry (with absolutely no Escort expertise)
    Are you sure you have never been with an "escort" Terry.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tderonne View Post
    And there is already a 1.8 Protege IN ITB, that ship has sailed.

    Good input though, thanks.
    But it's not the DOHC 16V motor that is in the GT and Miata. That SOHC motor has 103hp stock.

    Any 125hp motor is pressing it for ITB...but having said that, if it can't make weight then it should go up. We had 2 in the area, I will ask what they weighed.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    At 127 stock hp, it is roughly 2645 in ITB.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Southfield, MI
    Posts
    564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    But it's not the DOHC 16V motor that is in the GT and Miata. That SOHC motor has 103hp stock.
    Protege ES has a 1.8 DOHC FP-DE.
    http://www.clubprotege.com/wil/tech/3ginfo.htm

    It's at 2645 pounds makes me think it's 127 HP too.
    Tim

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Alachua, Florida
    Posts
    261

    Default

    If you move the Escort GT you have to move the 92-94 Protege. No way the Pro makes weight at 2325. I'd gladly run ITB at 2645
    Steve Elicati
    ITA 1994 Mazda Miata
    Central Florida Region

  10. #10

    Default

    We ran an 1991 Escort GT in ITA. The car was 150 lbs over weight with everything out that we could find, including side window glass. The car was never going to be competitive with the Acuras, Miatas and CRX's in ITA. With a re-built race engine and alot of work and money (and seat time) we had it down to 1.05 at LimeRock. It wasn't going much further!! Maybe ITB is where it belongs!
    I am not sure where Dan's car was at weight-wise but I am sure he was also over weight!
    Denise VanBuren

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton, Mi. 50 west of Detroit, 20 miles north of Ann Arbor.
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Just weighing in with my .02 worth... which probably isn't worth even that much! I raced against this exact car with my (then classed) Toyota FX-16 with the 4age twin cam engine, which is now classed in ITB. I was able to beat this particular car (granted his wife was driving it at the time, but she isn't exactly a slouch behind the wheel), and my FX wasn't extremely developed. I also had a developed ITB Prism, also with the 4age engine, and ran similar times to this Escort with that car. To me, it belongs in ITB, and 26xx sounds about right for weight..

    Now if I could only get the CRB to shed some pounds off of my 2760 Beetle in ITC...

    Kristian

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Southwest VA
    Posts
    101

    Default

    I run a 2000 Protege in ITB- stock HP is 122. As noted above, it is not the Miata 1.8 engine.

    FWIW, had to add weight back to get to 2645 (lotta weight). Chunky little beast as well, punches a big hole in the air.

    Not lobbying against this- ITB needs more cars.

    Steve

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    521

    Default

    Dick

    Are you sure you have never been with an "escort" Terry.
    Never one from Ford

    Terry

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI, USA
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
    At 127 stock hp, it is roughly 2645 in ITB.
    Passes the sniff test for me.

    Timmah - you provided the nice spreadsheet that helped me get the 924 moved - maybe just time to resubmit??

    You know what they say - write the letter!!
    Vaughan Scott
    Detroit Region #280052
    '79 924 #77 ITB
    #65 Hidari Firefly P2
    www.vaughanscott.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    But it's not the DOHC 16V motor that is in the GT and Miata. That SOHC motor has 103hp stock.

    Any 125hp motor is pressing it for ITB...but having said that, if it can't make weight then it should go up. We had 2 in the area, I will ask what they weighed.
    I tried to pull every last ounce I could and was still over 100+ above weight. Engine is a workhorse giving me no problems whatsoever over 4 seasons. I was able to kinda sorta keep up on the straights but in the turns I was a goner. Suspension and weight really put this car in the outclassed category. Great car to learn on but not a podium finisher.
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Thinking...thinking......thinking.......If the EGT goes to ITB, maybe sticking with the Integra in ITA might not be the way to go HMMMMMMMMMM
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tderonne View Post

    It's at 2645 pounds makes me think it's 127 HP too.
    What Jeff is saying is that if the ITA version gets moved to ITB, that is about the weight it would land at.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Anyone think this reclassification might happen?
    Would like to know before I try and get rid of the one I have.
    Built up pretty good and would hate to get rid of it if it
    goes to ITB.
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Someone needs to submit the official request. Work with the ITAC to know what documentation is required to support it, and make it happen.

    K

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    a request is in, and that's a start. what we will need are build sheets, dyno data, weights, and from more than one car (the more the merrier). we have not yet had a chance to discuss as a group or with the PTB.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •