Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: SCCA Clarifies STL Participation at 2012 Runoffs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default SCCA Clarifies STL Participation at 2012 Runoffs

    SCCA Clarifies STL Participation at 2012 Runoffs

    TOPEKA, Kan (Aug. 8, 2012) – Sports Car Club of America released the following information about the Super Touring® Lite (STL) class and its participation in the 2012 SCCA National Championship Runoffs®.


    http://www.scca.com/clubracing/news.cfm?cid=51108

  2. #2

    Default

    This should prove to be an interesting start -- I don't think a 3 field split start is very common, especially at the Runoffs.
    EP 1990 Mazda RX-7 (used to be STU until the turbo cars scared me away, and STL rotary cars require too much ballast)
    ITS/T4 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Chaos View Post
    This should prove to be an interesting start -- I don't think a 3 field split start is very common, especially at the Runoffs.
    "3 field"? There's only two classes in that group, STU and STL.

    Good entries so far, evenly split between Miatas and HondaMoCo cars and at least one RX-7. Miatas hold the top-3 (?) spots in National points and that RX-7 beat several of them for the June Sprints win...should be a good race.

    GA

  4. #4

    Default

    Oops, yes, it's only qualifying that's GT3, STU, and STL. So right now that's 42 cars on track for qualifying, which seems just slightly higher than average, but totally doable.

    During the race, try not to pass me.
    EP 1990 Mazda RX-7 (used to be STU until the turbo cars scared me away, and STL rotary cars require too much ballast)
    ITS/T4 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default



    It's very do-able. Very big track, I think SCCA is allowed to start something like 105 cars? Plenty of space.

    Eek, didn't notice we were qualifying with GT3. That's gonna kinda really suck in a 2L FWD car...damn, and not even on the track first time until Friday afternoon...ugh.

    Come find me, I'll probably be hanging out with Chris Childs and company.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    103

    Default

    25 cars/mile * 4 miles = 100 cars.

    GCR Page 58:

    6.4. THE GRID
    6.4.1 General
    A. 1 car in a class shall constitute a class. A car may not compete in
    more than one race class in the same race group.
    B. Number of Cars allowed on Course
    A maximum of 25 cars per mile may be on the course or started
    simultaneously in any type of session.
    The Division’s Executive Steward may increase or decrease the 25
    car limitation for any or all race groups.

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post


    It's very do-able. Very big track, I think SCCA is allowed to start something like 105 cars? Plenty of space.

    Eek, didn't notice we were qualifying with GT3. That's gonna kinda really suck in a 2L FWD car...damn, and not even on the track first time until Friday afternoon...ugh.

    Come find me, I'll probably be hanging out with Chris Childs and company.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Chaos View Post
    Oops, yes, it's only qualifying that's GT3, STU, and STL. So right now that's 42 cars on track for qualifying, which seems just slightly higher than average, but totally doable.

    During the race, try not to pass me.
    You're right to be worried about Greg at the Runoffs. Last Saturday I had the chance to handle and "bless" Greg's new rear wing. All indications are that it produces downforce without significant drag penalty. All for a total weight of 3.5 lbs including uprights and hardware.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Z3_GoCar View Post
    You're right to be worried about Greg at the Runoffs. Last Saturday I had the chance to handle and "bless" Greg's new rear wing. All indications are that it produces downforce without significant drag penalty. All for a total weight of 3.5 lbs including uprights and hardware.


    Kick Brooks in the butt, let's get that thing shipped! Running out of time...

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Z3_GoCar View Post
    You're right to be worried about Greg at the Runoffs. Last Saturday I had the chance to handle and "bless" Greg's new rear wing. All indications are that it produces downforce without significant drag penalty. All for a total weight of 3.5 lbs including uprights and hardware.
    That wing's not as light as mine -- which is invisible! Why would I need a wing when I've got all that rotary-powered torque to get me through the turns?
    EP 1990 Mazda RX-7 (used to be STU until the turbo cars scared me away, and STL rotary cars require too much ballast)
    ITS/T4 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post


    Kick Brooks in the butt, let's get that thing shipped! Running out of time...
    Can't hurry perfection. You'll get it when it's finished, and not any sooner. Brooks was telling me that he used to work for Fall Line, so he knows what he's doing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Chaos View Post
    That wing's not as light as mine -- which is invisible! Why would I need a wing when I've got all that rotary-powered torque to get me through the turns?
    ^

    Maybe it's heavier and more drag than without, but it'll give you more stick in the "Kink". Good job on getting your tires mounted, hopefully having rains will be enough to keep the rain away.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Z3_GoCar View Post
    You're right to be worried about Greg at the Runoffs. Last Saturday I had the chance to handle and "bless" Greg's new rear wing. All indications are that it produces downforce without significant drag penalty. All for a total weight of 3.5 lbs including uprights and hardware.
    TTIWWOP

    Show us the bling!

    K

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    TTIWWOP

    Show us the bling!

    K
    Agreed, I need to get some hardware then I'll post the photo's.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •