Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Spec Miata rules versus STL

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6

    Default Spec Miata rules versus STL

    It is possible to run a Spec Miata in SM trim and then double dip and run it in STL. Of course it could run legally there in complete SM spec. Or you could change, say, the tires and restrictor plate, in which case, it would need to then comply to all STL rules. In that case, is there anything in the carry-over SM spec that would not be legal by STL rules?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce B View Post
    It is possible to run a Spec Miata in SM trim and then double dip and run it in STL.
    9.1.4.B, p456, "Spec Miata cars completely conforming to Spec Miata class specifications are eligible for STL."

    Or you could change, say, the tires and restrictor plate, in which case, it would need to then comply to all STL rules.
    Correct. At that point, you must meet any and all regs within the Super Touring category.

    In that case, is there anything in the carry-over SM spec that would not be legal by STL rules?
    Head prep regs, probably. All that crap is the "tech shed legal" stuff that SM forced the club to approve.

    GA

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce B View Post
    In that case, is there anything in the carry-over SM spec that would not be legal by STL rules?
    Ride Height?
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  4. #4

    Default

    STL requires a dash bar in your roll cage and 140 lbs. of ballast (1.8 liter).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    if you can make it IT legal you could also pass it into STL as an IT car, then you could run w/o restrictor but still not be 100% ST legal. must be IT legal though.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Any SM with the proper chassis setup will meet the 5" requirement, remember its 5" to the rocker not including the pinch seam.
    Most importantly you must run a non power steering rack.
    Also, a 1.6 can not run a torsen in IT.
    Jerry
    NER South

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Concord, NH 03301
    Posts
    700

    Default

    If the car is 100% legal for IT it is then legal for STL. Perfect. So why do I have to add balast for STL (when the ITS weight is lower than the STL weight)?

    "...may compete in STL under their current IT specifications." Minimum weight is part of the IT specifications is it not?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MMiskoe View Post
    Minimum weight is part of the IT specifications is it not?
    Correct.

    The comment above in regard to adding 140# ballast was a shot at the fact that if you prep under full-up STL regs you have to be 140# heavier (to go along with that extra horsepower, bigger brakes, bigger tires, better shocks, 6-speed transmission, rear wing, etc. I know, it's really unfair...)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    Correct.

    The comment above in regard to adding 140# ballast was a shot at the fact that if you prep under full-up STL regs you have to be 140# heavier (to go along with that extra horsepower, bigger brakes, bigger tires, better shocks, 6-speed transmission, rear wing, etc. I know, it's really unfair...)
    and carbon hood, and carbon decklid, and....

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •