Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Polyurethane bushings?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Gainesville, GA
    Posts
    493

    Default Polyurethane bushings?

    Someone stated on another forum that poly bushings should be avoided because the deform under racing loads and do not return to original form like rubber. This is the first time I've ever seen that opinion but I wanted to see what the experts here thought.

    Opine away.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    it is true, and they wear out in time as a result. not a bad option in many cases given the price and alternatives, and they are almost always less compliant than the stock rubber, which is usually better. decent "first step" choice. keep them lubed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Boyertown, PA- USA
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Keep in mind how the bushed joint goes through motion as well. Many times, the compliance of the rubber is used to allow deflection along axes other than that of the bushing, and changing that compliance can create binding, which drastically affects the effective spring rate. This is even worse when you use a single axis bearing or solid bushing when a spherical is needed.

    I'd suggest Delrin (nylon) for the applications we see, if you can't go metallic. There are also nylon-bushed sphericals if you need those. I'm not sure what sizes are available in those, but I'd check under the names Del-sphere and Roto-joint.
    Matt Green

    ITAC Member- 2012-??
    Tire Shaver at TreadZone- www.treadzone.com
    #96 Dodge Shelby Charger ITB- Mine, mine, all mine!
    I was around when they actually improved Improved Touring! (and now I'm trying not to mess it up!)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    note, thoguh that a delrin bushing works less well than a polyurethane one when the motion is other than single axis rotation.

    backformore, what car? Honda? avoid poly rear traling arm center bushing. get new OEM or Mugen rubber (I've heard they are now the same) the rest you can use poly no problem on 92-00Civics and DC tegs. 88-89 civic/CRX and DA teg there's some compliance in the front end, sphericals or stock there thoguh the poly will work for a while.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by backformore View Post
    Someone stated on another forum that poly bushings should be avoided because the deform under racing loads and do not return to original form like rubber. This is the first time I've ever seen that opinion but I wanted to see what the experts here thought.

    Opine away.
    Yep that's right. Have to look at a number of factors though as others mentioned. In some areas fine, in others not. IMO bad for anything that sees either big deformations or any rotating stress on it. Higher durometer rubber is better in many applicaions, and plastic or metal if forces are in a single plane with controlled motion... Depending on the application, I have just made my own from delrin.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    168

    Default

    Just buy these and be done . http://kingpinmachine.com/

    I have driven Honda's with stock bushings, poly bushings, and these. And these are by far the best.
    Blake Meredith

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bamfp View Post
    Just buy these and be done . http://kingpinmachine.com/

    I have driven Honda's with stock bushings, poly bushings, and these. And these are by far the best.
    I've been out of IT for a while, but metal bushing are allowed now?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    spherical bearings are now SPECIFICALLY allowed, have been for a few years.

    +1 for Chris @ kingpin. He makes some of the nicest looking spherical inserts and spacers I've ever seen, and has designs doen for most of the popular hondas.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip42 View Post
    +1 for Chris @ kingpin.
    +2. Using his stuff on my STL Integra.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kingwood , Texas
    Posts
    153

    Default

    OK , I'm going to ask a " dumb " question

    Just how much of a difference do sphericals make on a car ?

    Looks like the next step on my miata , but my checkbook is getting thin from the development process.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TStiles View Post
    Just how much of a difference do sphericals make on a car ?
    They're an "nth degree" thing on the scale of all the stuff you want to do. Springs/shocks/swaybars are all more important. Sphericals' primary function is to reduce the flex and movement (to improve geometry) and to reduce "sticktion" so your shocks and springs are more repeatable and consistent. In some limited case (e.g., Nissan 240SX) they allow a larger range of unbound movement, but for most cars that's not such a big deal.

    Sphericals "can" make a big difference, but IMO only once you've taken care of all the big stuff first.

    GA

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    +1 for what tGA said. When using poly in my suspension, it would be typical for the suspension to act one way at the start of a session, different at mid-session and very different at end of session. No braking, no turn-in nor apex point was the exactly the same since the poly would flex differently throughout the session. Again, we're talking nth degree here, yet noticable and as I changed bushings, my times have dropped.

    FYI, I run solid bronze PCI bushings up front, PCI spherical for the rear trailing arm and Progress LCA in the rear.

    http://www.kingmotorsports.com/p-106...shing-kit.aspx

    http://www.kingmotorsports.com/p-106...aring-kit.aspx

    http://www.progressauto.com/products.../productID/282

    PS. I run just poly at the shock mounts. Happy shopping!
    Last edited by mossaidis; 06-07-2012 at 11:10 AM.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kingwood , Texas
    Posts
    153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    They're an "nth degree" thing on the scale of all the stuff you want to do. Springs/shocks/swaybars are all more important. Sphericals' primary function is to reduce the flex and movement (to improve geometry) and to reduce "sticktion" so your shocks and springs are more repeatable and consistent. In some limited case (e.g., Nissan 240SX) they allow a larger range of unbound movement, but for most cars that's not such a big deal.

    Sphericals "can" make a big difference, but IMO only once you've taken care of all the big stuff first.

    GA
    That's consistent with my understanding , Thanks for the confirmation.

    A couple of other thoughts I would welcome feedback on :

    - getting rid of the rubber bushing on a shock has more value than on a control arm that has good geometry ( miata )

    - The jump from good stock bushings to poly bushings is just not that big of a deal ( I did it on another miata and the impact was insignificant ) but the jump from stock to sphericals should be a significant step in improving repeatability , turn in , corrections , getting shocks dialed in , ect.

    - Adding sphericals to a miata is going to be the biggest thing I can do to get that " formula car feel " that I miss ( FC & SRF )

    Thoughts ?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Gainesville, GA
    Posts
    493

    Default

    Thanks for the input. Sphericals are not in the current budget. Very early stage of development (like ground zero). Probably stick with stock bushings now and focus on some areas of larger gain.

    Car is a 00 Civic Si for those that care

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    IMO, poly > stock. Good luck!
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Boyertown, PA- USA
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip42 View Post
    note, thoguh that a delrin bushing works less well than a polyurethane one when the motion is other than single axis rotation.
    Chip- yes, and thanks for that clarification.

    Does anyone in IT use the Delrin-caged sphericals? It's a somewhat acctractive thought, as they are rebuildable on the cheap. The stub-struts on the rear a-arm mounts in my Charger are in need of some, um, better control I think, and I'm contemplating my options...
    Matt Green

    ITAC Member- 2012-??
    Tire Shaver at TreadZone- www.treadzone.com
    #96 Dodge Shelby Charger ITB- Mine, mine, all mine!
    I was around when they actually improved Improved Touring! (and now I'm trying not to mess it up!)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •