Results 1 to 20 of 152

Thread: New IT class revealed at National Convention

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    for the Oregon region being proactive and trying to find a place for these racers to race in the SCCA.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    This is going to be a VERY interesting place to watch the "cheap race cars" experiment in all of its glory.

    ** ITJ gives people with existing Lemons/Chump cars a place to race

    ** The "$500 rule" goes POOF without a tzar to enforce it at the races

    ** Time passes - about 18 months is my guess

    ** Someone looks at the ITJ rules and does a purpose-built car - without the cultural and enforcement constraints, it's going to be KILLER, DUDE...!

    It's like someone did a ctrl+alt+del on IT.

    K

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    I wish they didn't give a false representation to what IT is... These cars are not IT cars at all and probably never will be. They should have called it what it is not an IT car.

    Stephen

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Lots of flaws for sure, but at least they're trying. I sort of figure the entire "junk race car" thing is a fad, but you never know.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    can't these cars run ITE anyways if they have the proper safety equipment?

    or is it the fact that the cars are prepared to the "specs" of an alternate series that they do not not need to meet certain GCR issues?
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    can't these cars run ITE anyways if they have the proper safety equipment?
    ITE differs from region to region. Therefore this might be the case is some regions, but maybe not in Oregon.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    601

    Default

    Have you all been to a LeMons/Chump event? Chump Car isn't that bad, many cars I've seen are similar to IT cars, many of which don't even have the crazy glue on shark fin type items you all mention. I was surprised at how quick and how well prepped some of the cars at the Road Atlanta Chump Car round looked.

    ITJ sounds like a joke though, as someone said, without the $500 rules and what not it just makes no sense. Plus why would you want to run it with SCCA when there is a busy Chump Car schedule anyway with endurance races and full fields?

    What safety rules are different for these than SCCA? I think the only main difference is no H&N system, no?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI, USA
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StephenB View Post
    I wish they didn't give a false representation to what IT is... These cars are not IT cars at all and probably never will be. They should have called it what it is not an IT car.

    Stephen
    Are we really that sure the "rest" of SCCA Club Racing can tell the difference between and ITJ car and any other IT car?
    Vaughan Scott
    Detroit Region #280052
    '79 924 #77 ITB
    #65 Hidari Firefly P2
    www.vaughanscott.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    I think this is a great idea.

    What are the licensing requirements though? Do you have to have a regional road racing license?

    I think that will keep a lot of the folks with these cars away.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kingwood , Texas
    Posts
    153

    Default

    I would love to see the potential revenue come into the club , However the challenge is going to be in mixing race groups with ITJ and I'm not crazy about adding more race groups to a crowded schedule

    Some of those ChumpCar are pretty slow.

    Going to be interesting when some of the guys lap the same car 3-4 times in a rational race

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    cromwell ct
    Posts
    746

    Default

    So what happens when a guy with a $500 investment (little skin in the game) pulls a total bonehead move and takes out a 60K racecar? Oh well....that's racing???

    I think it's a poor idea......sounds purely revenue-centric to me....

    The good news is this will pave the way for figure-8 racing, school bus racing, demo derbies, monster trucks, corn dogs and funnel cakes......

    R
    Rob Breault
    BMW 328is #36
    2008 Driving Impressions Pro-ITA Champion
    2008 NARRC DP Champion
    2009 NARRC ITR Champion
    2009 Team DI Pro-ITR Champion

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Tampa FL area
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Actually the Chumpcars are more in the spirit of what IT cars started out as or at least intended. Basically street cars with safety equipment added. Just not having the expense of everyone investing in high dollar suspensions and blueprinted and beyond motors.And once everyone spent all that money for same type improvements wheres the advantage?Whats with the snobbery anyway?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    This is going to be a VERY interesting place to watch the "cheap race cars" experiment in all of its glory.

    ** ITJ gives people with existing Lemons/Chump cars a place to race

    ** The "$500 rule" goes POOF without a tzar to enforce it at the races

    ** Time passes - about 18 months is my guess

    ** Someone looks at the ITJ rules and does a purpose-built car - without the cultural and enforcement constraints, it's going to be KILLER, DUDE...!

    It's like someone did a ctrl+alt+del on IT.

    K
    Lemons has already done that, and Chump making it worse....
    I've run IT/A since 1992, and have been running Lemons for years instead. I get to build what I want, how I want, so long as its within the cost. I'm running a Lexus LS400 without any "bolt on" decorations and its a blast! Meanwhile, my nearly perfectly prepared AE86 sits covered in the garage on new but aging hoosiers due to getting bumped to ITB where I don't want to bolt 220lb to it. Its how IT used to be - and in the good way.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •