ITJ has been announced by Oregon region. The class is designed to give a place in SCCA racing for LeMons/Chump cars. In case you are wondering the official class name is Improved Touring JUNK.
ITJ has been announced by Oregon region. The class is designed to give a place in SCCA racing for LeMons/Chump cars. In case you are wondering the official class name is Improved Touring JUNK.
Jerry
Lone Star Regional Executive
Lone Star Tech Chief.
Is it April 1st already?!
Chris Rallo "the kid"
-- "wrenching and racing" -- "will race for food!" -- "Onward and Upward"
Where's my Fonzi icon...?
By the time these cars are built to meet SCCA safety prep standards, and drivers are wearing SCCA-required safety equipment, the whole concept is well above "Look down, there's some sharks!" status...
Can't wait until the first SoWDiv scrutineer looks at something with a shark fin bolted on top and pulls out the "neat and clean appearance" GCR requirement...
Have fun!
This is for real. I have a friend going through SCCA Driver's School in one out there.
Rob Foley
Race: ITB '87 CRX Si
Autocross: GP '86 Civic Si
Bill Stevens - Mbr # 103106
BnS Racing www.bnsracing.net
92 ITA Saturn
83 ITB Shelby Dodge Charger
Sponsors - Race-Keeper Data/Video Aquisition Systems www.race-keeper.com
Simpson Performance Products - simpsonraceproducts.com
I went to the SCCA Oregon website and this schedule for the upcoming Drivers school/regional shows ITJ as a class!!
http://www.oregonscca.com/media-libr...-12%281%29.pdf
ITJ will be running in race group 7
My question is....who's paying for the zamboni to sweep the track after ITJ runs?
Last edited by BruceG; 03-07-2012 at 09:02 AM.
for the Oregon region being proactive and trying to find a place for these racers to race in the SCCA.
This is going to be a VERY interesting place to watch the "cheap race cars" experiment in all of its glory.
** ITJ gives people with existing Lemons/Chump cars a place to race
** The "$500 rule" goes POOF without a tzar to enforce it at the races
** Time passes - about 18 months is my guess
** Someone looks at the ITJ rules and does a purpose-built car - without the cultural and enforcement constraints, it's going to be KILLER, DUDE...!
It's like someone did a ctrl+alt+del on IT.
K
I wish they didn't give a false representation to what IT is... These cars are not IT cars at all and probably never will be. They should have called it what it is not an IT car.
Stephen
Lots of flaws for sure, but at least they're trying. I sort of figure the entire "junk race car" thing is a fad, but you never know.
Actually the Chumpcars are more in the spirit of what IT cars started out as or at least intended. Basically street cars with safety equipment added. Just not having the expense of everyone investing in high dollar suspensions and blueprinted and beyond motors.And once everyone spent all that money for same type improvements wheres the advantage?Whats with the snobbery anyway?
Lemons has already done that, and Chump making it worse....
I've run IT/A since 1992, and have been running Lemons for years instead. I get to build what I want, how I want, so long as its within the cost. I'm running a Lexus LS400 without any "bolt on" decorations and its a blast! Meanwhile, my nearly perfectly prepared AE86 sits covered in the garage on new but aging hoosiers due to getting bumped to ITB where I don't want to bolt 220lb to it. Its how IT used to be - and in the good way.
Bookmarks