Results 1 to 20 of 152

Thread: New IT class revealed at National Convention

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    616

    Default New IT class revealed at National Convention

    ITJ has been announced by Oregon region. The class is designed to give a place in SCCA racing for LeMons/Chump cars. In case you are wondering the official class name is Improved Touring JUNK.
    Jerry

    Lone Star Regional Executive
    Lone Star Tech Chief.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CT/NY/NJ
    Posts
    1,157

    Default

    Is it April 1st already?!
    Chris Rallo "the kid"
    -- "wrenching and racing" -- "will race for food!" -- "Onward and Upward"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    601

    Default

    LOL There's no way!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Where's my Fonzi icon...?

    By the time these cars are built to meet SCCA safety prep standards, and drivers are wearing SCCA-required safety equipment, the whole concept is well above "Look down, there's some sharks!" status...

    Can't wait until the first SoWDiv scrutineer looks at something with a shark fin bolted on top and pulls out the "neat and clean appearance" GCR requirement...

    Have fun!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Greater Gotham City
    Posts
    114

    Default

    This is for real. I have a friend going through SCCA Driver's School in one out there.
    Rob Foley
    Race: ITB '87 CRX Si
    Autocross: GP '86 Civic Si

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Grove City, OH, USA
    Posts
    1,449

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    Where's my Fonzi icon...?

    By the time these cars are built to meet SCCA safety prep standards, and drivers are wearing SCCA-required safety equipment, the whole concept is well above "Look down, there's some sharks!" status...

    Can't wait until the first SoWDiv scrutineer looks at something with a shark fin bolted on top and pulls out the "neat and clean appearance" GCR requirement...

    Have fun!
    Shark fins might be OK, but the stripper poles may raise some eyebrows
    Bill Stevens - Mbr # 103106
    BnS Racing www.bnsracing.net
    92 ITA Saturn
    83 ITB Shelby Dodge Charger
    Sponsors - Race-Keeper Data/Video Aquisition Systems www.race-keeper.com
    Simpson Performance Products - simpsonraceproducts.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jhooten View Post
    ITJ has been announced by Oregon region. The class is designed to give a place in SCCA racing for LeMons/Chump cars. In case you are wondering the official class name is Improved Touring JUNK.
    I went to the SCCA Oregon website and this schedule for the upcoming Drivers school/regional shows ITJ as a class!!

    http://www.oregonscca.com/media-libr...-12%281%29.pdf

    ITJ will be running in race group 7

    My question is....who's paying for the zamboni to sweep the track after ITJ runs?
    Last edited by BruceG; 03-07-2012 at 09:02 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    for the Oregon region being proactive and trying to find a place for these racers to race in the SCCA.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    This is going to be a VERY interesting place to watch the "cheap race cars" experiment in all of its glory.

    ** ITJ gives people with existing Lemons/Chump cars a place to race

    ** The "$500 rule" goes POOF without a tzar to enforce it at the races

    ** Time passes - about 18 months is my guess

    ** Someone looks at the ITJ rules and does a purpose-built car - without the cultural and enforcement constraints, it's going to be KILLER, DUDE...!

    It's like someone did a ctrl+alt+del on IT.

    K

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    I wish they didn't give a false representation to what IT is... These cars are not IT cars at all and probably never will be. They should have called it what it is not an IT car.

    Stephen

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Lots of flaws for sure, but at least they're trying. I sort of figure the entire "junk race car" thing is a fad, but you never know.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI, USA
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StephenB View Post
    I wish they didn't give a false representation to what IT is... These cars are not IT cars at all and probably never will be. They should have called it what it is not an IT car.

    Stephen
    Are we really that sure the "rest" of SCCA Club Racing can tell the difference between and ITJ car and any other IT car?
    Vaughan Scott
    Detroit Region #280052
    '79 924 #77 ITB
    #65 Hidari Firefly P2
    www.vaughanscott.com

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Tampa FL area
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Actually the Chumpcars are more in the spirit of what IT cars started out as or at least intended. Basically street cars with safety equipment added. Just not having the expense of everyone investing in high dollar suspensions and blueprinted and beyond motors.And once everyone spent all that money for same type improvements wheres the advantage?Whats with the snobbery anyway?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    This is going to be a VERY interesting place to watch the "cheap race cars" experiment in all of its glory.

    ** ITJ gives people with existing Lemons/Chump cars a place to race

    ** The "$500 rule" goes POOF without a tzar to enforce it at the races

    ** Time passes - about 18 months is my guess

    ** Someone looks at the ITJ rules and does a purpose-built car - without the cultural and enforcement constraints, it's going to be KILLER, DUDE...!

    It's like someone did a ctrl+alt+del on IT.

    K
    Lemons has already done that, and Chump making it worse....
    I've run IT/A since 1992, and have been running Lemons for years instead. I get to build what I want, how I want, so long as its within the cost. I'm running a Lexus LS400 without any "bolt on" decorations and its a blast! Meanwhile, my nearly perfectly prepared AE86 sits covered in the garage on new but aging hoosiers due to getting bumped to ITB where I don't want to bolt 220lb to it. Its how IT used to be - and in the good way.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •