Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: 15x6 wheel .........hmmmm?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Kensington, CT, USA
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    Thanks Chip! I haven't run my MR2 since it changed to ITB. I used to run 14x7 revolution wheels with a 25mm offset (anybody want em?) with a 225/50 Hoosier. It fit perfectly with the drop I have - and about a -3deg camber all around. So with 10mm less tire each side and 10mm less offset - a 20 mm spacer will get me back where I was. It's probably. not necessary to go all the way there - but thick spacers make me a bit nervous without another set of bolts.
    Jake Fisher : ITA MR2 #22 : www.racerjake.com

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jake View Post
    but thick spacers make me a bit nervous without another set of bolts.
    hub-cebtric spacer and wheel keeps misalignment down to near zero. using nuts to secure the spacer to the hub on elongated studs adds a small margin of safety and can be accomodated on thick spacers. doubling the number of bolts doubles the number of failure points for all failure modes associated with the studs, as well as noting that the wheel studs are pressed into aluminum and that a small misalignment of the wheel means a greater angular deformation of the "second" stud than the same misalignment and long studs (because of the spacer). that greater angle is supported in the steel into aluminum press fit which is much weaker than the steel-steel press fit at the hub.

    generally this all works out to be plenty safe and strong enough, but why add the weight and complexity when, if done right, long studs through the spacer are the better solution in all respects except maybe cost, which isn't at all prohibitive?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Fl
    Posts
    193

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip42 View Post
    hub-cebtric spacer and wheel keeps misalignment down to near zero. using nuts to secure the spacer to the hub on elongated studs adds a small margin of safety and can be accomodated on thick spacers. doubling the number of bolts doubles the number of failure points for all failure modes associated with the studs, as well as noting that the wheel studs are pressed into aluminum and that a small misalignment of the wheel means a greater angular deformation of the "second" stud than the same misalignment and long studs (because of the spacer). that greater angle is supported in the steel into aluminum press fit which is much weaker than the steel-steel press fit at the hub.

    generally this all works out to be plenty safe and strong enough, but why add the weight and complexity when, if done right, long studs through the spacer are the better solution in all respects except maybe cost, which isn't at all prohibitive?
    Chris Leone
    318i going STL!!!
    E36 ITS underconstruction(sold)
    84 944 ITS (sold)
    71 240z more than half way there/now GT2 bound!!
    ChrisLeonemotorsports.com
    Roll cages and fabrication

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Kensington, CT, USA
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    Makes sense. Thanks!
    Jake Fisher : ITA MR2 #22 : www.racerjake.com

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •