Results 1 to 20 of 67

Thread: STL Chassis Builds?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    So this brings up a good point. Greg wants only ITS and 'down' chassis in STL but really everything in ITR is eligible (sans S2000 and Hype R) with the proper motor. Think of all the cars you could 'dumb down'.

    325
    328
    330
    E30 M3
    Z3's
    Z4's
    E36 M3
    Preludes
    Is300
    SC300
    300ZX with SR20!!!!!!!!!!!
    New 911 GT3 with old 2Litre!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    LMFAO, this is fun!!!!!!!!!!! KEEP THE EXCLUSIONS COMING!!!!!!

    Seriously guys, make the cc/weight class a cc/weight class.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    So this brings up a good point. Greg wants only ITS and 'down' chassis in STL but really everything in ITR is eligible (sans S2000 and Hype R) with the proper motor. Think of all the cars you could 'dumb down'.


    New 911 GT3 with old 2Litre!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    LMFAO, this is fun!!!!!!!!!!! KEEP THE EXCLUSIONS COMING!!!!!!

    Seriously guys, make the cc/weight class a cc/weight class.
    Haha...imagine how dumb that would look on rims half as wide as stock, LOL. Like it's on space savers!!!
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    So this brings up a good point. Greg wants only ITS and 'down' chassis in STL but really everything in ITR is eligible (sans S2000 and Hype R) with the proper motor. Think of all the cars you could 'dumb down'.

    325
    328
    330
    E30 M3
    Z3's
    Z4's
    E36 M3
    Preludes
    Is300
    SC300
    300ZX with SR20!!!!!!!!!!!
    New 911 GT3 with old 2Litre!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    LMFAO, this is fun!!!!!!!!!!! KEEP THE EXCLUSIONS COMING!!!!!!

    Seriously guys, make the cc/weight class a cc/weight class.
    and every single one of those chassis' with an allowable STL engine will be a heavy slow slug - before the RWD penalty is applied.

    That's a whole host of perectly good "touring car" chassis that have no reason or business being built for STL.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Yea, I think the point is, to my way of thinking, that you can't just say. "This chassis is Ok, and this one isn't".
    You can't say, "Nothing from ITS or ITR"...
    That's ignoring that IT is a HP based classing system. The same chassis COULD run in ITR, ITS, ITA and ITB. Think of a Miata with a 2.5L motor making 245hp, the current ITS version, the current ITA version, and a older 1.3 motor, making 110, for ITB.
    Last edited by lateapex911; 01-07-2012 at 02:27 AM.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Purcellville, VA USA
    Posts
    902

    Default

    Chris "The Cat Killer" Childs
    Angry Sheep Motorsports
    810 417 7777
    angrysheepmotorsports.com

    IT,SM,SS,Touring, and Super Touring

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rabbit07 View Post
    'Zactly. I've never seen a class "jump the shark" within the SCCA membership as quickly as Super Touring Light. Even Chump Cars and LeMons lasted longer than this one...

    Time for another beer.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    The four cylinder Z3's kosher because it's an ITA car and less than 2.0 liters (if only it'd even make power, I think Kesler has already shown it won't), but the same chassis with a wider rear subframe won't because it's an ITR car??? While the 318 was the exact same motor in the same chassis as the 325/328, only these have multi-link.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JS154 View Post
    and every single one of those chassis' with an allowable STL engine will be a heavy slow slug - before the RWD penalty is applied.
    IF they couldn't get down to weight. If they could, then they would be fine - except we don't want those chassis, because they are in ITR!!!! Ugh.

    Like Jake said, if we are afraid of Miata's, then just outlaw RWD with DW's at all 4 corners instead of a dynamic exclusion list for cars that can actually compete. If you want this to be a FWD under-2L tuner class, MAKE IT ONE! Stop jerking us all around and sink or swim on your original concept instead of trying to fill fields with half-baked classifications (12A/13.

    Not all classes will have a spot for cars I like. No problem at all with that, but just be what you are and stand tall with it.

    Phew. Time for a Yuengling or 4.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Purcellville, VA USA
    Posts
    902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt;

    Phew. Time for a Yuengling or 4.
    I love that stuff
    Chris "The Cat Killer" Childs
    Angry Sheep Motorsports
    810 417 7777
    angrysheepmotorsports.com

    IT,SM,SS,Touring, and Super Touring

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Purcellville, VA USA
    Posts
    902

    Default

    FYI a miata is on the pole for the national tomorrow at Sebring.
    Chris "The Cat Killer" Childs
    Angry Sheep Motorsports
    810 417 7777
    angrysheepmotorsports.com

    IT,SM,SS,Touring, and Super Touring

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    168

    Default

    And he is over a second slower then the pole in SM. So I am guessing that it is not a fully built STL car.
    Blake Meredith

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rabbit07 View Post
    FYI a miata is on the pole for the national tomorrow at Sebring.
    So why is that even a data point when the car is obviously multiple seconds off the pace? Really.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    So why is that even a data point when the car is obviously multiple seconds off the pace? Really.
    Meh, no surprise. There's probably a negative number of "built" STL cars entered and, as we've all tangentially agreed, the Miata out-of-the-box is probably the best chassis out there.

    I know Keane's Integra is still in near-SSC trim, as he was asking me just last week about things like springs, shocks, and swaybars. I'm guessing all he did was take out any extra ballast and easily-accessible interior parts and slapped some STL stickers on the thing.

    I am surprised, however, that there isn't a larger number of Spec Miatas doing double duty, especially given the new Ho-Hos they're running (which can explain a lot about comparison lap times this weekend...is SM faster this year than last?)

    GA

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •