Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Disconnected front sway bar

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default Disconnected front sway bar

    I have disconnected the front sway bar in my FWD Ford Escort Gt.
    I have 500lb springs in front, 600 in rear. Koni double adjustable struts, 8611's
    This action has been recommended to me for better cornering.
    However without being able to run a test day prior to a race I am
    a little apprehensive as to what it will handle like.
    What kind of handling changes can I expect or what should I look for.
    Does this make sense to try without a test day?
    Thanks
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    I guess qualifying will be your test day.

    Related to this discussion, for FWD cars, what are the benefits / disadvantages of disconnecting the front bar?

    If this is done, do you typically change spring rates?
    Dave Gran
    Real Roads, Real Car Guys – Real World Road Tests
    Go Ahead - Take the Wheel's Free Guide to Racing

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    13

    Default

    You should expect slower turn-in and less understeer mid corner. The car will be less flat through the corners as well, which may unload the inside rear tire more, assuming your rear sway bar is beefy.

    Also rumble strips shouldn't upset the front as much because those bumps won't be transfered over to the tire doing most of the work. However since the rear end could be more loose, be cautious the first few times over the rumbles.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EH9racing View Post
    You should expect slower turn-in and less understeer mid corner. The car will be less flat through the corners as well, which may unload the inside rear tire more, assuming your rear sway bar is beefy.

    Also rumble strips shouldn't upset the front as much because those bumps won't be transfered over to the tire doing most of the work. However since the rear end could be more loose, be cautious the first few times over the rumbles.
    Less understeer would be great, I assume an earlier turn in would help and the rear end loose could help somewhat as now I have to feather the gas in a turn to try and get some rotation.
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gran racing View Post
    I guess qualifying will be your test day.

    Related to this discussion, for FWD cars, what are the benefits / disadvantages of disconnecting the front bar?

    If this is done, do you typically change spring rates?
    I do expect to increase the front springs to 600 to start. perhaps go up from there.

    Yeah qualifying will be an adventure for awhile!!
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Wouldn't increasing your Front spring rate be going in the opposite direction? I kind of look at sway bars like a beam suspension,which uses horizontal steel plates instead of springs. The steel twists when you turn and he more steel bars you have, the stiffer it is. With sway bars it is kind of the same way. In FWD we want the rear end to come around, so we have a big (stiff) rear bar and little to no front bar (soft). I think adding a stiffer front spring would set you backwards a bit and the car will understeer more, much like if you still had the front sway bar on. Changing springs is not necessary, I think it's important to get your spring rates where you like them and where the car handles well. Then use the shocks to fine tune the springs, and after that, adjust the sway bars to perfect your setup. All three are working together, but I think it's good to look at the big picture (springs) then go to the more finite things (sway bar) to perfect it.

    On another related note, I have an adjustable sway bar. Right now it is mounted at the front hole. Will moving the mounting point backwards increase stiffness?

    I hope this helps, and I would enjoy reading others opinions on setup, it's probably my favorite component of the car.

    Steven
    1989 ITA Honda Civic Si
    Washington D.C. Region

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Fl
    Posts
    193

    Default

    ^^^^^^ What he said!!!!!
    Chris Leone
    318i going STL!!!
    E36 ITS underconstruction(sold)
    84 944 ITS (sold)
    71 240z more than half way there/now GT2 bound!!
    ChrisLeonemotorsports.com
    Roll cages and fabrication

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SMac92 View Post
    Wouldn't increasing your Front spring rate be going in the opposite direction? I kind of look at sway bars like a beam suspension,which uses horizontal steel plates instead of springs. The steel twists when you turn and he more steel bars you have, the stiffer it is. With sway bars it is kind of the same way. In FWD we want the rear end to come around, so we have a big (stiff) rear bar and little to no front bar (soft). I think adding a stiffer front spring would set you backwards a bit and the car will understeer more, much like if you still had the front sway bar on. Changing springs is not necessary, I think it's important to get your spring rates where you like them and where the car handles well. Then use the shocks to fine tune the springs, and after that, adjust the sway bars to perfect your setup. All three are working together, but I think it's good to look at the big picture (springs) then go to the more finite things (sway bar) to perfect it.

    On another related note, I have an adjustable sway bar. Right now it is mounted at the front hole. Will moving the mounting point backwards increase stiffness?

    I hope this helps, and I would enjoy reading others opinions on setup, it's probably my favorite component of the car.

    Steven
    Makes alot of sense. The wheels will act independently though without the sway bar rather than together. The stiffer springs would get rid of the diving action going into a turn. I thought that action should be lessened somewhat.
    Great thought.... I will try current spring and see how much I dive, maybe I need it just as is.
    Thanks
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    South of Chicago, near Indiana.
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Te bottom line is make only one change at a time. Disconnecting the front bar and adding stiffer front springs is "2" changes! If you don't like the change you won't know which one is the problem and if the car goes faster which one helped!
    1988 ITA Scriocco 16V #80
    MCSCC member since 1988

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    The most common reasons that people run with no front anti-roll bar in fwd applications are to promote rotation, and to improve corner exit traction. The balance/rotation aspect has been covered. Because the anti-roll bar ties the front wheels together, they reduce the vertical load on the inside front tire during body roll. If there is an open, or low torque locking differential, this can cause wheel spin.
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Newton, MA
    Posts
    170

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SMac92 View Post
    On another related note, I have an adjustable sway bar. Right now it is mounted at the front hole. Will moving the mounting point backwards increase stiffness?

    Moving to hole further away from the sway bar fulrum (chassis mount) "softens" the bar. moving closer provides less leverage and effectively makes the bar "stiffer"
    Brad
    1995 Mazda Miata (aka Black Betty)
    #13

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbbski View Post
    Te bottom line is make only one change at a time. Disconnecting the front bar and adding stiffer front springs is "2" changes! If you don't like the change you won't know which one is the problem and if the car goes faster which one helped!
    Will do, one change at a time.
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Fort Mill, SC
    Posts
    328

    Default

    From my experience in making an ITA Neon ACR handle as good as it can get on a budget, I would make the following changes to your car.

    700lb rear springs
    Smaller front sway than the GT bar you can swap
    And unless you already have one on the car, look at the biggest diameter adjustable rear bar you can get so you have some adjustability at the back.

    At the very least you need more rear spring, also make sure your Konis are valved for the spring rate
    Last edited by cjb25hs; 06-28-2011 at 08:15 PM.
    1987 ITS RX-7
    2014 Ford Focus ST
    Currently borrowing tow vehicles!!

    Central Carolina Region

    STEELERS SIX PACK!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    loudon
    Posts
    135

    Default

    this is how i understand FWD cars. 10% pluse corner weight pluse a big bar in the rear makes the car go round and fast!! But watch out it is a lil tail happy. If u really wanna test the car make big changes than try try again till you get it the way u like it.:026:

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    FL.
    Posts
    1,384

    Default

    Pretty close on rates. That car should scale about 700# on the LF, maybe 650n the Rf.
    The 500# may be a little low. The 650 in the rear should be close. But I dont know waht the wheel rate is RE the spring rate. The A arm cars are not 100% wheel rate to spring rate. You may need more or a little less. The car will be faster if you can get it to work without the front bar. If it felt good before , with the bar and 500s, you may want to go up some front spring, 600# should be very close, figuring around 95%-99% wheel rate . Toe out the rear a bit , 3mm , buy my book, go faster. MM
    Mike Ogren , FWDracingguide.com, 352.4288.983 ,http://www.ogren-engineering.com/

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyinglizard View Post
    Pretty close on rates. That car should scale about 700# on the LF, maybe 650n the Rf.
    The 500# may be a little low. The 650 in the rear should be close. But I dont know waht the wheel rate is RE the spring rate. The A arm cars are not 100% wheel rate to spring rate. You may need more or a little less. The car will be faster if you can get it to work without the front bar. If it felt good before , with the bar and 500s, you may want to go up some front spring, 600# should be very close, figuring around 95%-99% wheel rate . Toe out the rear a bit , 3mm , buy my book, go faster. MM
    Thanks, great info and will do on the book, did not know it existed.
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Thank you all for the info. Exactly what I was looking for, consistent, knowledgeable and informative, sometimes this forum really works!!!!!
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyinglizard View Post
    Pretty close on rates. That car should scale about 700# on the LF, maybe 650n the Rf.
    The 500# may be a little low. The 650 in the rear should be close. But I dont know waht the wheel rate is RE the spring rate. The A arm cars are not 100% wheel rate to spring rate. You may need more or a little less. The car will be faster if you can get it to work without the front bar. If it felt good before , with the bar and 500s, you may want to go up some front spring, 600# should be very close, figuring around 95%-99% wheel rate . Toe out the rear a bit , 3mm , buy my book, go faster. MM
    Bought it!!!!
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wandering the USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wepsbee View Post
    Thank you all for the info. Exactly what I was looking for, consistent, knowledgeable and informative, sometimes this forum really works!!!!!
    It only really works if you end up going faster.
    Marty Doane
    ITS RX-7 #13 (sold)
    2016 Winnebago Journey (home)

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    West Hurley, NY
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle7 View Post
    It only really works if you end up going faster.
    TRUE
    Dan Deyo
    92 Acura Integra
    ITA #94

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •