Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34

Thread: WE MADE TARGET WHP!!!! (almost...)

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Lagrangeville, NY
    Posts
    694

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JLawton View Post
    Ziiiiiing!!! Nice one!!


    Yeah, more guys are stepping it up in the North East. No winning with a half assed build!!


    .
    There will be a certain blue and yellow crx packing some hp and torque at lrp.
    Chris Raffaelli
    NER 24FP

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mossaidis View Post
    I believe 38% for the CRX si D16a6 engine. For the D16z6 (and probably the other VTEC D16's unless in IT it's 25% and for good reason... I have a 10/10th build and I am more or less there, within +/- 1 whp depending on the day, the dyno settings, etc.

    Here's the math.

    2270 lbs (process weight) - 50 lbs DW adder = 2220 lbs
    2220 lbs / 0.98 FWD subractor = 2265 lbs (if unadjusted)
    2265 lbs / 14.5 lb/chp ratio = 156.2 chp
    156.2chp * 0.85 standard driveline ratio loss = 132.7 process whp

    OR

    156.2 chp - 125 stock chp = 31.2 chp upgrade via IT allowed mods
    31.2 chp / 125 stock chp = 24.96% or ~ 25%
    i'll accept your math above that is saying 156.2 Crank HP. but since the 90-91's were rated at 108 hp, then 156.2/108 = 1.446

    so call it a 45% multiplier.

    nice hp numbers btw. and thanks for sharing.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CRallo View Post
    Damn dude! Excited about your car much?! Yo
    U are all over this thread!!! Its good to see man! I'm glad that you are psyched!
    maybe a little...

    Quote Originally Posted by CRallo View Post
    How many?
    I SAID MANY DAMNIT!!! now stop reminding me... j/k (i crack myself up)

    Quote Originally Posted by CRallo View Post
    Work is conflicting with the June race and maybe the July race, but look for us at the NARRCoffs!
    No wgi? no njmp? pooh...
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    i'll accept your math above that is saying 156.2 Crank HP. but since the 90-91's were rated at 108 hp, then 156.2/108 = 1.446

    so call it a 45% multiplier.

    nice hp numbers btw. and thanks for sharing.
    Tom, those numbers were posted selfishly for my car. Here is the 90-91 Civic/CRX Si/Ex as far as I know it.

    2250 lbs (process weight) - 50 lbs DW adder = 2200 lbs
    2200 lbs / 0.98 FWD subractor = 2244 lbs (if unadjusted)
    2244 lbs / 14.5 lb/chp ratio = 154.8 chp
    154.8 chp * 0.85 standard driveline ratio loss = 131.6 process whp

    OR

    154.8 chp - 108 stock chp = 46.8 chp upgrade via IT allowed mods
    46.8 chp / 108 stock chp = 43.3% or ~ 43%

    wow, that's crazy though there's probably more weight adders that I am NOT aware of. It's been posted on it.com before lots of time, it was well know that the Honda advertised lower than real chp for the D16a6.

    there was a guy that knows a guy that said his CRX Si "did 135whp but on a Dynojet". That second guy was not Moser but another well respected CRX dude. if unaltered that dynojet posted 10% higher than real whp, then perhaps 122whp, about 9 whp below target. My suggestion is to talk to Moser or King Motorsports to see how much they were off the mark. Otherwise, I would call that extra 150 lbs "reward weight" for driving a d16a6. (sorry)
    Last edited by mossaidis; 06-11-2011 at 09:03 AM.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CT/NY/NJ
    Posts
    1,157

    Default

    That's okay, you're allowed!



    Maybe and maybe (mostly depends on $$)... But WGI is very much about power and I don't know T-Bolt very well yet(and my teammate has never driven it)

    Oh and If YOU could get those numbers, they should proly through a lil extra weight at it just to be safe!

    Quote Originally Posted by mossaidis View Post
    maybe a little...



    I SAID MANY DAMNIT!!! now stop reminding me... j/k (i crack myself up)



    No wgi? no njmp? pooh...
    Last edited by CRallo; 06-11-2011 at 11:22 AM.
    Chris Rallo "the kid"
    -- "wrenching and racing" -- "will race for food!" -- "Onward and Upward"

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CT/NY/NJ
    Posts
    1,157

    Default

    Someone else's Honda been working out?

    Should be some good racing!

    Quote Originally Posted by raffaelli View Post
    There will be a certain blue and yellow crx packing some hp and torque at lrp.
    Chris Rallo "the kid"
    -- "wrenching and racing" -- "will race for food!" -- "Onward and Upward"

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CRallo View Post
    Oh and If YOU could get those numbers, they should proly through a lil extra weight at it just to be safe!
    the car weighs 2308 with 5/8 tank of gas and a 200lbs driver w/ gear. So, it's 38 lbs overweight. When I asked Matt if there's anything we can do to lose weight, he said: "you, you're a fat ass". He's right again.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  8. #28

    Default

    He would tell you that.....I thought it was good we have both #12 cars in his shop at the same time.

    See you at LRP Mickey. I think I owe you a full gas can.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CT/NY/NJ
    Posts
    1,157

    Default

    +1 that Matt WOULD say that! LOL I was thinking the same thing before I even scrolled down!

    So who has the number reserved for ITA? Or do you two arm wrestle over it?

    Quote Originally Posted by vicktorvolpe View Post
    He would tell you that.....I thought it was good we have both #12 cars in his shop at the same time.

    See you at LRP Mickey. I think I owe you a full gas can.
    Chris Rallo "the kid"
    -- "wrenching and racing" -- "will race for food!" -- "Onward and Upward"

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CT/NY/NJ
    Posts
    1,157

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mossaidis View Post
    the car weighs 2308 with 5/8 tank of gas and a 200lbs driver w/ gear. So, it's 38 lbs overweight. When I asked Matt if there's anything we can do to lose weight, he said: "you, you're a fat ass". He's right again.
    Wait! What does 5/8's of a tank of gas have to do with anything?! That's what we start with for J when he is in the car...
    Chris Rallo "the kid"
    -- "wrenching and racing" -- "will race for food!" -- "Onward and Upward"

  11. #31
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colchester, CT, USA
    Posts
    2,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mossaidis View Post
    . When I asked Matt if there's anything we can do to lose weight, he said: "you, you're a fat ass". He's right again.
    Welcome to the club. You just paid the Kessler "Stupid Tax". You say something stupid, Matt is gonna make you pay!!





    You guys, LRP is so NOT about the horse power in ITA. There are so many other things you have to do right, to be fast...........
    Jeff L

    ITA Miata



    2010 NARRC Champion

    2007 NERRC Championship, 2nd place
    2008 NARRC Championship, 2nd place
    2009 NARRC Championship, 2nd place

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Yep, that was 4 years ago, I've done a fair amount of reading on dynos since then, and while it is correct on the differences on how dynos operate, it's totally wrong on "set in stone" differences between what a motor reads on this dyno or that.

    Seriously.

    It is NOT accurate, in anyway, to say that a particular type of dyno always reads higher or lower than another.
    Quote Originally Posted by Z3_GoCar View Post
    Agreed that the "tuning paramaters" can be used to skew the dynojet's lower, but I'm sure you remember replying to this....
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
    Yep, that was 4 years ago, I've done a fair amount of reading on dynos since then, and while it is correct on the differences on how dynos operate, it's totally wrong on "set in stone" differences between what a motor reads on this dyno or that.

    Seriously.

    It is NOT accurate, in anyway, to say that a particular type of dyno always reads higher or lower than another.
    True, we have had SM's validate our Pack on Jets and they were within 1%. We also have developed a 'correction factor with the cooling water on and off.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  14. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CRallo View Post
    +1 that Matt WOULD say that! LOL I was thinking the same thing before I even scrolled down!

    So who has the number reserved for ITA? Or do you two arm wrestle over it?
    I run my #12 meotter in SM & SM2 now. I never ran it in ITA (I'm just here because of the fun I used to have with the volvo's when SSM and ITB were in the same group).

    I only run ITA in enduros....and I don't do that that well.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •