Results 1 to 20 of 516

Thread: ITS Ford Mustang(s) Build - Stripper Stang Part II

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    I don’t think I have posted on this thread before but I have read it religiously. You have done a great service to the community by documenting the builds. Most people have no idea what it takes to build a car that has not been developed yet. When people complain that they have developed their car and it is not competitive I point them to this thread. When people say “I will build the car I have rather than buy a car” I point them to this thread.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    ...so you are quite literally tuning the drive shaft?

    That one looks like a B-flat.

    K
    Basically. Jeff just sent calculations indicating one of the vibration modes that most affects his car will hit around 4933 RPM and others after that. In consulting with a smart fellow at one of the driveshaft places here in NC it turns out they're already well aware of the phenomenon and have dealt with it on numerous cars over the years.

    Quote Originally Posted by dickita15 View Post
    I don’t think I have posted on this thread before but I have read it religiously. You have done a great service to the community by documenting the builds. Most people have no idea what it takes to build a car that has not been developed yet. When people complain that they have developed their car and it is not competitive I point them to this thread. When people say “I will build the car I have rather than buy a car” I point them to this thread.
    Thanks for the thanks, glad you enjoyed it. Somewhere along the way we picked up the "Bag of Yay" phrase which was used to described any situation, subassembly, job, or part that was going to end up causing us a buttload of work and/or make our build difficult. Suffice to say, in building any new car there are lots of of these situations. Looking back it'd be pretty easy to draw a build plan for one of these cars and significantly reduce or eliminate all of these problems so at least we're proving we can learn. But you know, building a car is fun because learning and solving problems is enjoyable and exercise for the mind. Those Bags of Yay, while annoying, are part of the process and milestones for how progress is measured.
    Last edited by Ron Earp; 05-15-2013 at 03:17 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    107

    Default

    I bought a car

    I ended up redoing almost everything, at least a little



    6 in one, 1/2 dozen in another


    this thread is one of my favorite anywhere. How's he doing balancing on the driveshaft?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Race cars are highly personal for most of us. It'd be a bit hard to get a car, even if "perfect" to someone else, and not end up changing quite a bit of it. I know I've had my fair share of that scenario with my old Z. The Z was an old race car, and with many previous owners, so it came with a lot of issues that were solved in some rather unconventional ways.

    In the end I think that we got most of the problems sorted out and it went on to become a reliable and fast race car. But it was never *my* car. I tried as best I could to make it so, but unless you're starting from scratch it is a difficult goal to obtain. And, as soon as you're finished building a car from scratch that is yours, it isn't too hard to have a look at it and find all sorts of ways to improve it for V2.0. Such is the nature of race cars.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    641

    Default

    But you can't tuna fish.
    Steve Linn | Fins Up Racing | #6 ITA Sentra SE-R | www.indyscca.org

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    2,942

    Default

    Ron--Did you ever figure out what caused the main cap to crack?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Negative on the main cap. It could have been installation error. It could have had a small crack for quite a bit of time and finally revealed itself. The vibration harmonics could have had something to do with it, but I doubt it. We won't ever know, but at least the rebuilt motor is doing just fine and doesn't seem to have issues. Its making more power than mine and has already survived twice as long as the one with the main cap failure.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dickita15 View Post
    I don’t think I have posted on this thread before but I have read it religiously. You have done a great service to the community by documenting the builds. Most people have no idea what it takes to build a car that has not been developed yet. When people complain that they have developed their car and it is not competitive I point them to this thread. When people say “I will build the car I have rather than buy a car” I point them to this thread.
    The thing you quickly learn is development is NEVER done. Ever. Always something to improve.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    I figured I’d provide another update on Team Stangwerks.

    We’ve had a lot of ups and downs in the last seven or eight months:

    *Suspension binding in the rear is now identified and we’re reconfiguring the “trilink”. I think our ability to put down the power we have will greatly improve.
    *Green car finally received motor V2.0, which had to be removed last month to fix a crank scraper oil leak.
    *Green car finally received the proper rear end ratio to avoid fifth gear.
    *Both cars received better tunes, but, they both stopped responding well to A/F targets causing some fueling issues.
    *Red car broke three tranmission tail shaft housings; green car did not. We have ideas.
    *Proper spring rates were decided upon.
    *Chased pinion angles and fixed driveline vibrations.
    *Konis went off to Lee for revalving, we were not optimal. We’ll be much better.
    *New headers are designed but not yet constructed.

    We’re now in various stages of each of these points and winter maintenance is also occurring, all new bearings, brake calipers, and fluids. As usual, we’ve done all the work on everything and are certainly improving our skill set.

    We’ve also booked a date here and we’ll take one of the cars down for a proper suspension study:

    http://www.morsemeasurements.com/wha...sting-answers/


    With two cars it is somewhat affordable to split the study, about the cost of a set of tires.

    Team Stangwerks finished up the year pretty well with a one-two finish at the SARRC at RRR. We certainly didn’t expect to do that well, but on the other hand we worked hard on the test day and finally got a suspension setup that was somewhat reasonable and gave us some traction allowing us us to get off the corners equal to other cars. Also contributing were the points leader missing qualifying, Steve E not making it, P3 through P6 having a serious dogfight, Jeff Y getting of six once poorly and giving me an opening, but still, Jeff G drove a strong race and won. Here is some in car, although it doesn't include the finish. The finish had me on Jeff G’s rear bumper 0.251 seconds apart. Fun race.

    http://youtu.be/hsZDN8VTHnU





    And we had some good racing at VIR in the ECR.



    And a good SARRC race, although Jeff G broke a tranny and had to drop out. Jeff Young drove well and took the win with Plucker a close third.



    Looking forward to a great 2014 and fun racing with good friends!
    Last edited by Ron Earp; 01-27-2014 at 08:24 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Great stuff
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Finally found part of the last lap, the checker with a car length between us.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14rrb7oXmYc[/ame]

    Work still continues with rear axle rebuilding, tri-link re-engineering, chassis setup, and some other odds and ends. I believe we've made significant strides in the rear chassis configuration/setup and will be able to put power down far sooner than we were able to in 2012/2013. That's really the key for us, to be able to capitalize on our good low and mid-range horsepower. At a track like say CMP we can turn in just fine and brake with the best of them, but lose on power application in the carousel, a very important section of the track, as well as T12. CMP doesn't have long straights so the RX7s can't kill us on top like Daytona or CMS, and if we can get that power down early without losing the rear we might do well at that track. And those improvements would help a lot at RRR where the race is to see who can lay down the pedal soonest in T6.
    Last edited by Ron Earp; 02-12-2014 at 05:51 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •