Results 1 to 20 of 484

Thread: May 2011 Fastrack

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    if the process is working, we should all have one of the cars to have...but this does make me more optimistic. thanks!

    with regards to making the weight, the car was originally in "A" as 1800 # + 180 # driver then later 1980 driver included.

    the car may be able even if the driver is not....

    but i have added things over the years and was not really thinking weight (dash bar, right side door bars, etc.)

    Tom

    FS: two ~ 50 # blocks of steel
    but don't call because i will be out walking 4 miles per night to lose weight.
    Sorry if it came off differently, but it was meant as a positive comment. We still need to resolve the front runners that hold a significant lb/hp advantage, but I feel better about that today than I did a year ago.

    I have come to realize that ITB, and if it were more widely subscribed, and saw more cars added/built raced ITC will always be very difficult for the ITAC to deal with. At the end of the day, the more lbs/hp targeted in the process, the more sensitive it is to the assumed hp going in. So we see big swings any time power gain assumptions are adjusted. That means small errors will have larger effects and it will always be tougher to "get it right". It's good to see so much effort put towards getting there though .
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Thanks for the props, and also thanks for recognizing that last point.

    1 hp "error" on our (the ITAC) side in either getting the stock hp right or the gain right means 17 lbs in ITB and what, 22 or something in ITC? So a 10 hp "error" in ITC is TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY POUNDS -- on a car that weighs probably 2000 to 2200 lbs.

    On an ITR car? 11 lbs per hp on cars that generally weigh closer to 3000 lbs. So if we make a 10 hp error there, it's 110 lbs on a 3000 lb car.

    B and C are hard for us because the downside for not getting it right is much higher.

    But we do try, I promise you that.

    Quote Originally Posted by shwah View Post
    Sorry if it came off differently, but it was meant as a positive comment. We still need to resolve the front runners that hold a significant lb/hp advantage, but I feel better about that today than I did a year ago.

    I have come to realize that ITB, and if it were more widely subscribed, and saw more cars added/built raced ITC will always be very difficult for the ITAC to deal with. At the end of the day, the more lbs/hp targeted in the process, the more sensitive it is to the assumed hp going in. So we see big swings any time power gain assumptions are adjusted. That means small errors will have larger effects and it will always be tougher to "get it right". It's good to see so much effort put towards getting there though .
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    641

    Default

    Not your grandma's T3 Buick racecar....

    Steve Linn | Fins Up Racing | #6 ITA Sentra SE-R | www.indyscca.org

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •