Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: S4 vs. S5

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    119

    Default S4 vs. S5

    Looking for a little feedback on the S4 vs. S5. I know factory set up shows the S4 making 146hp and the S5 making 160. What is the optimum set up assuming you are using all stock components? My 2nd gen ITS car had an S4 with S5 electronics (I think). Are the "kegs" interchangeable? Can the S4 setup do as well as the S5?
    There are a few S4's for sale at reasonable prices. Just wondering what you guys think/know. Thanks
    Greg Blastic
    Lookin' for a new one!
    '86 RX7 ITS w/'89 Drivetrain Sold!
    ITS #5 GSLSE(still goin' strong) Sold!
    IT7 Project( now complete!!) Sold!
    Waterford Hills Regular
    Occasional GLD
    Howell, MI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ITS5GB View Post
    Looking for a little feedback on the S4 vs. S5. I know factory set up shows the S4 making 146hp and the S5 making 160. What is the optimum set up assuming you are using all stock components? My 2nd gen ITS car had an S4 with S5 electronics (I think). Are the "kegs" interchangeable? Can the S4 setup do as well as the S5?
    There are a few S4's for sale at reasonable prices. Just wondering what you guys think/know. Thanks
    More than likely your car had S5 rotors with the S4 intake, AFM, OMP and electronics. A common swap is the S5 intake into that mix. Most guys do it all at once with the S5 'upper and lower' ends (intake, housings, rotors, etc) into an S4 chassis and install the accessories as noted above.

    Nobody should be running the guts out of an S4.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    119

    Default

    So should I be looking for a car with the 351 coded ECU as a start?
    Greg Blastic
    Lookin' for a new one!
    '86 RX7 ITS w/'89 Drivetrain Sold!
    ITS #5 GSLSE(still goin' strong) Sold!
    IT7 Project( now complete!!) Sold!
    Waterford Hills Regular
    Occasional GLD
    Howell, MI

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Plymouth, MI
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Looks like the ECU has to stay with the car. Same with the front cover, throttle body, injectors, AFM, water pump.

    http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/ro...ries5swap.html

    So even if you use a higher compression S5 engine, you will have to operate it with a ECU that is tuned for the lower compression, at least if this article is right. And the internet is always right, right?
    Last edited by Fallout; 03-02-2011 at 09:15 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    564

    Default

    '86 chassis IIRC is the lightest. S5 rotors and intake superior to S4, those are the two biggies for hp. Lots of other differences between the two, with "better" falling in both buckets.

    I ran a S4 shell, S4 ECU w/ clipped limiter, S4 housings, S5 rotors, S5 intake, S4 TB and AFM and the car made power.

    Take a look around at rx7club.com and you will find lots of information on the various differences. The best car is half S4, half S5.
    Mark B. - Dallas, TX
    #76 RX-7 2nd Gen
    SCCA EP
    Former ITS, ITE, NASA PT

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mbuskuhl View Post
    ...S4 housings, S5 rotors, S5 intake, S4 TB and AFM and the car made power...
    Uuuuhhhh...what happened to "shall be substituted as a complete assembly"...?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    raymond NH
    Posts
    623

    Default

    How did I know you would ask that Greg. Hmmmmmm

    Dan-0

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    77

    Default

    ECU's are free now so you would not need the S5 ECU and electronic metering pump. You just want the S5 rotors, I have heard back and forth on which intake to run S4 or S5 but never seen back to back dyno results. I agree the best is S4 lighter chassis with S5 power.
    Going off memory but I think the S4 control arms have replaceable ball joints and the S5 also has a slightly bigger fuel tank, but the S5 body updates do look a little more modern.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    Uuuuhhhh...what happened to "shall be substituted as a complete assembly"...?
    Just read the rules again. Thanks for pointing that out. I ran ITS for a brief period in '07 is all. Since there were no other ITS cars in my area then, I switched to ITE and later PT_. Looks like you need to use the entire long block. There is no advantage to the S4 housings, AFM or TB, but the rules are what they are and call for "complete assembly".
    Mark B. - Dallas, TX
    #76 RX-7 2nd Gen
    SCCA EP
    Former ITS, ITE, NASA PT

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Plymouth, MI
    Posts
    22

    Default

    So help me to understand that better:

    The rules dictate a housing and rotors coming from the same Generation.
    And it is a big problem to swap a complete S5 engine into a S4 car.

    -> Most 2nd Gen ITS cars out there are S4s due to the lighter chassis and have S4 engines w. S4 ECU/TB/AFM with S5 intakes?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fallout View Post
    So help me to understand that better:

    The rules dictate a housing and rotors coming from the same Generation.
    And it is a big problem to swap a complete S5 engine into a S4 car.

    -> Most 2nd Gen ITS cars out there are S4s due to the lighter chassis and have S4 engines w. S4 ECU/TB/AFM with S5 intakes?
    No, it's not a big problem. I may be over-simplifying it but:

    S5 motor. Complete with housings, rotors, intake, etc.

    If you are running an S4 chassis, you will probably be using the S4 harness. So the easy button is the AFM from the S4 (not the MAF from the S5), and the manual OMP hardware. ECU's are open but using the one from the S4 is cheap.

    Bolt on a nice intake, get the ISC header and exhaust and you will have about 170whp.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •