Results 1 to 20 of 92

Thread: February Fastrack

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Tijeras, NM
    Posts
    579

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    Is that the true underlying reason/basis here? To go smaller than stock? I'd find it hard to believe there's enough demand for that to rationalize changing these rules...
    I bet a lot of folks would like to run really large wheels, if only for appearances. On first thought, I don't have a problem with the idea since I don't think there is much to gain down that route (other than improved gearing options).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Think about it practically as well.

    It's probably not easy to find a 18X7 wheel for example.

    Kind of "meh" on this one, but let's hear what people think.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    The ITA four cylinder Z3 only came with 16x7 rims in this country, and it's been allowed to run that size in ITA. The problem is that 16" tire choices are limited when compared to 17" tire choices...

    Was probably one of the newer ITB chassis. If it's just one more example, I say add a spec line exception.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •