Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 100

Thread: I decided to send in a request to remove/replace wires in IT cars

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default I decided to send in a request to remove/replace wires in IT cars

    I am sure there are divided opinions on this. The request is pasted below. What do folks think?

    Request Details

    Title: Allow replacement wiring
    Category: IT
    Class: IT
    Car: none
    Request: Please provide an allowance to remove or replace wires and connectors in vehicle and engine wiring harnesses. Prohibit the addition of any functional current/signal path that was not present in the OEM system (you cannot run a new wire path that wasn't already there unless it is already permitted within the rules), in respect of the principles of the class.

    The reason for my request is just a basic desire to simplify repair and maintenance of the race car.

    While I am aware that there may be some cases where a car could loose some amount of weight through re-wiring, I struggle to convince myself that this could account for more than one or two dozen pounds. Personally as a competitor I don't mind one bit if every other racer in my class is able to achieve minimum specified weight - that would only make the racing more competitive and thus enjoyable. Considering that most oem wiring is routed along the floor and/or frame rails, I am not even convinced that loosing a few pounds there is an advantage vis a vis weight distribution.

    As car builders and maintainers we would appreciate the opportunity to clean up the appearance and servicability of our race cars when we encounter a wiring failure or decide to take advantage of an allowance such as installing a replacement ecu. Please allow us to do so.

    thank you,
    Chris Schaafsma

    letter number #3799
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    South of Chicago, near Indiana.
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Chris! Duck! LOL
    1988 ITA Scriocco 16V #80
    MCSCC member since 1988

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    good luck.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    FL.
    Posts
    1,384

    Default

    I add wires and cut off ends of the fuel pump circuit, and ignition drive. Anything that makes the car run more often should be legal, IMHO. MM
    Mike Ogren , FWDracingguide.com, 352.4288.983 ,http://www.ogren-engineering.com/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Grove City, OH, USA
    Posts
    1,449

    Default

    Chris: I appreciate your effort, and agree with your request. I fear, however, that you will probably receive the same answer that I received when I requested that we be allowed to add small plates to allow us to jack our 25+ year old cars safely - 'the rules are adequate as written.'
    Bill Stevens - Mbr # 103106
    BnS Racing www.bnsracing.net
    92 ITA Saturn
    83 ITB Shelby Dodge Charger
    Sponsors - Race-Keeper Data/Video Aquisition Systems www.race-keeper.com
    Simpson Performance Products - simpsonraceproducts.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    how does this make the class better if there is already an allowance to remove an old crusty wire (or entire harness) and replace with a new one?
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Chris,

    i am glad you brought up the subject of wiring. i meant to start a thread to ask about what to do with wires that might end up "hot" due to allowed mods.

    There is this section in the rules:


    Gauges and instruments may be added, replaced, or removed.
    as well as this part:


    f. Carpets, center consoles, floor mats, headliners, sun roof liner and frame, dome lights, grab handles, and their insulating, attaching or operating mechanisms may be removed.
    so i can remove the dome light but not the wires to it. or i can remove a gauge but not the wires to it.

    i removed the dome light and crap when i removed my sunroof mechanism, etc. i coiled up the wires leading to the dome light and zipped it to the roll cage. but typically the dome light does not have its own fuse and so when the door opens, the lead to the light is "hot."

    so some wires are "hot" because of allowable mods and i taped it off. i would much rather pull the wires back to the source.

    sorry to bend the thread but i think there is more to the issue of removing wires than the engine harness.

    tom
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    "Operating mechanism"

    In reality the wire is one of the mechanisms that make it work. No?

    Stephen

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Can you snip the hot wire way back in the harness and insulate it? The wire's still there but no current.
    Would that work?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    Chris,

    i am glad you brought up the subject of wiring. i meant to start a thread to ask about what to do with wires that might end up "hot" due to allowed mods.

    so i can remove the dome light but not the wires to it. or i can remove a gauge but not the wires to it.

    i removed the dome light and crap when i removed my sunroof mechanism, etc. i coiled up the wires leading to the dome light and zipped it to the roll cage. but typically the dome light does not have its own fuse and so when the door opens, the lead to the light is "hot."

    so some wires are "hot" because of allowable mods and i taped it off. i would much rather pull the wires back to the source.
    I wondered the same thing myself since I've got a hot dome light wire going to the windshield header. Maybe I should pull it back through it's routing and coil it up at the source. But at some point someone needs to take a look at the rules and clean up the ridiculous ones like this.

    And I thought jacking plates were not illegal?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    what i think is ridiculous is people who drive race cars, which require fire systems/extinguishers, extensive roll cages, nomex, specialty helmets and restraint systems, etc. trying to sell an exposed dome light wire as a safety issue that cannot be dealt with other making wholesale changes to the rules.

    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTIspirit View Post
    And I thought jacking plates were not illegal?
    Depends on how they are done. The ones on my car are completely legal and very functional. The ones I've see on other RX-7s are chassis stiffeners.

    (Shhh, look the other way, wink wink, nudge nudge. it's one of them geo-graph-ical deals.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tnord View Post
    what i think is ridiculous is people who drive race cars, which require fire systems/extinguishers, extensive roll cages, nomex, specialty helmets and restraint systems, etc. trying to sell an exposed dome light wire as a safety issue that cannot be dealt with other making wholesale changes to the rules.

    With all due respect I hope you know that this response represents your opinion on behalf of the ITAC. Your on the ITAC that will review that exact letter and you get a chance to vote with your peers on it. Being disrespectful to the membership that YOU represent is ridiculous. This comment that you made is completely useless and has no valuable input on the discussion that the original poster created. I really hope your going to have more input when fulfilling your commitment to represent me and the other "ridiculous " people that are involved in the IT classes.

    Stephen

    PS: Wholesale change? Really? How long have you been IT racing, I am guessing not long...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Why doesn't the OP consider the wires that lead to the dome light either 'attaching', 'operating' or 'insulating' mechanisms?

    I do. Probably all 3.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    And what many think ridiculous is
    Quote Originally Posted by tnord View Post
    people who drive race cars, which require fire systems/extinguishers, extensive roll cages, nomex, specialty helmets and restraint systems, etc.
    having to work to justify removing things that don't belong in a race car such as dome lights, OEM wiring harnesses, washer bottles, and so on.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    Why doesn't the OP consider the wires that lead to the dome light either 'attaching', 'operating' or 'insulating' mechanisms?

    I do. Probably all 3.
    from Webster's:

    Mechanism: a mechanical contrivance; structure of a machine.
    to me, the section of "mechanism" can only apply to something like the sunroof as opposed to the carpet. "operating" pretty much speaks to "mechanisms" imho.

    to me, "attaching" would be hardware and brackets.

    "insulating" might have a far flung hope of applying because the wires are indeed insulated.

    tnord, sorry to be playing the "safety" card but it was SCCA that taught me that with the periodic replacement of belts, etc.

    if the consensus on the forum is wiring can be removed if the device to which the device was attached can be removed, so be it. but why not have a clear rule set to begin with.

    on second thought, i think i'll pull my washer bottle as well and put 3M windoweld in my motor mounts since most here think that those rules are BS as well.

    besides, the wires that i can pull because they were "attached" to the dome light are attached to the wire harness that is attached to my washer bottle, ergo, i can pull the washer bottle, right?
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Earp View Post
    And what many think ridiculous is having to work to justify removing things that don't belong in a race car such as dome lights, OEM wiring harnesses, washer bottles, and so on.
    So you're telling me my Golf isn't a race car...?

    Seriously, Ron - that's just not an effective test. EVERYONE has a different perception of what a race car "should be." You want to put it out to a vote and end up with body kits and ginormous rear wings? Or let popular perception relegate anything that's over 25 years old to vintage. Or the scrapper. Yeah - THAT'S the rule we should us. Anything with carbs can't possibly be a "racing car!"

    K

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    So you're telling me my Golf isn't a race car...?
    In my opinion it be a far more serviceable race car if it was stripped to the bare essentials leaving the core components of IT which you eloquently stated in another post, basically stock suspension, stock motor/tranny/brakes, stock body, and the rest of it - have at it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    Seriously, Ron - that's just not an effective test. EVERYONE has a different perception of what a race car "should be."
    Kirk, I realize that. I was born at night but I wasn't born last night. We all have different opinions of what IT should be and about this time every year we all start airing them out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    You want to put it out to a vote and end up with body kits and ginormous rear wings?
    I seriously doubt that will happen. The motor mount vote indicates to me that the ITAC/CRB isn't all that interested in what the members want.

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    Or let popular perception relegate anything that's over 25 years old to vintage.
    Sort of like the hot new "National-sort-of-like-IT-for-Hondas" class that everyone is talking about? That one regulates quite a few older cars out of the running.

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    Or the scrapper. Yeah - THAT'S the rule we should us. Anything with carbs can't possibly be a "racing car!"
    I'm with you there. The sun is setting on the carbed cars in ITS with the open ECU rules. As it should. At some point we've got to move on.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    I acknowledge we may hurt/ruin IT with any changes like this. But my personal view is we will ultimately improve it and help keep it vital.

    We aren't going down the prod road. The biggest "change" to IT in my race career has been the Process -- which is a system designed to ensure stability, and not the opposite.

    The second biggest was the ECU rule, and if there ever was creep, more like a leap really, that was it.

    But beyond that, Kirk, a question for you - what has fundamentally changed about the IT rule set? And let's leave passenger seats and carpet and stuff like that out of it. What about the core stuff has changed?

    In my opinion, since day one of IT, the answer is nothing. That is not true of prod.

    We now have an official competitor in STU/STL that in my view is trying to woo the IT crowd.

    I don't see anyone other than (and I say this with all due respect) the old guard who really wants to race racecars with dome lights and washer bottles and all of the dual purpose vestiges that serve no purpose other than as symbols of a of a conservative ruleset.

    I agree it is a ruleset that has served us well, but if we don't do things that, without violating what IT is truly about, make IT more attractive to newer and new racers, the category will die. Just as if we "prod-ized" it.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    EDIT - Never mind. It's all been said before. I'm not changing anyone's mind.

    I want air jacks.

    K

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •