One...more....time...

[tom91ita]

i think i will write another letter regarding H&NR.

only this time i will include ACCUS.

http://www.accusfia.us/

[RacerBill]

i think i will write another letter regarding H&NR.

only this time i will include ACCUS.

http://www.accusfia.us/

Isn't the President and CEO of SCCA also a VP of ACCUS?????????

[tom91ita]

Bill,

not sure about the exact connection but it was something like that.

besides, i think it might be a broader appeal if we can communicate that there is a reason for them to collectively accept a performance based standard as opposed to a design based standard.

[GTIspirit]

I'm surprised no one has mentioned the "warts and all" aspect of picking your car for IT. How is it that this saying applies to other discussions, but when it comes to motor mounts poorly suited/fragile for racing application that it's ok to dispense with this wart?

Personally I was opposed to the wording of the previous proposal. I felt there were too many vagaries and loopholes that could be exploited to some kind of advantage, like stated above, such as relocating the engine or modifying the kinematics of the mount system.

If it's simply a material substitution allowance, stock mounting locations and geometry must be maintained, however this is worded, then I'm in support.