86.5-87 Supra in ITS

[Rabbit07]

Am I the only one who thinks this car is too heavy?

[jhooten]

The weight is right for the engine potential. That is one of the reasons I chose an 85 to build.

[JeffYoung]

It may be "off" from the process, but probably not by much. I think it is the highest stock hp car (200 right?) in IT. So, barring other factors, it should have the highest weight.

[Rabbit07]

It is rated 200 hp stock. The way I figure it it should be about 150 lbs lighter than it is.

[Andy Bettencourt]

Inline 6's were processed with a 30% multiplier when I was on the AC. Take a look at everything in the ITCS with that style motor and work back from IT-prep power. All VERY potent.

200*1.3*11.25=2925

[Andy Bettencourt]

It may be "off" from the process, but probably not by much. I think it is the highest stock hp car (200 right?) in IT. So, barring other factors, it should have the highest weight.

Huh? It's an ITR car and it is far from the highest HP. Actually a pretty decent weight for a car with power and torque.

[JeffYoung]

No, it is in ITS (highest stock hp again, in S), at like 3200 something.

On edit (all of the early Supras are in S):

Toyota Supra
(82-85)
6 Cyl
DOHC
83.0 x 85.0
2759
(I) 44.0
(E) 36.0
9.2 103.0 14 / 15 3.29, 1.89, 1.28,
1.00, 0.78
(F) 256 Disc
(R) 264 Disc
2750

Toyota Supra
(86 1/2-87)
6 Cyl
DOHC
83.0 x 91.0
2954
(I) 32.0
(E) 27.5
9.2 102.2 16 3.29, 1.89, 1.28,
1.00, 0.78
(F) 299 Disc
(R) 290 Disc

3380

[Andy Bettencourt]

Weird. 2 Supras in ITR. The 220hp 93-97 and the 87-92 which has 200hp. 200hp in ITR is exactly 2925lbs.

Check out the overlap of years in the ITCS...86-87

A fix is in order I guess...