Pretty funny stuff in the CoA section. At the end of Jon Farbman's is the following:This was after finding Jon's appeal not well founded. But in the very next listing (Matt Green's), they state the following:Originally Posted by CoAYet the deemed Matt's appeal to be well founded. The only additional documents or evidence that was rec'd in Matt's case vs. Jon's case was an email from the SOM Chairman, Dan Hodge. I know if I was Jon, I'd be pissed for this apparent lack of consistency in determining what is and is not a well founded appeal.Originally Posted by CoA
Bookmarks