Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 101 to 113 of 113

Thread: Removal of Charcoal Canisters (fuel tank vents) okay?

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Did a bit more looking and it looks like something at grainger would work

    http://m.grainger.com/mobile/details/?R=1WPE5

    http://m.grainger.com/mobile/details/?R=4DJA7

    I kind of like the 1/2" ball check and install vertically to allow flow into the tank. This should allow for normal venting and then seal when upside down.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  2. #102
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Very cool, useful because my canister is in the way of my new high capacity filter.

    I know aquarium supply places have smaller check valves, any input on their suitability? The evap line on my Civic is 5/16 or maybe a little smaller.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Sayre PA USA 45 Miles from Watkins Glen
    Posts
    816

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    Any suggestions for a check valve?
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/abt-tf350
    Tom Weaver: Logistics & Technical Support Manager IE truck driver for 1986 RX-7 ITS #63. "Diesel Haulin' Rotary" 2005 Dodge 2500 Quad Cab The Hemi has retired "Long Live the Hemi" Bill Weaver Driver- 2004 NYSRRC John Chave Award. 2006 & 2013 ITS NYSRRC Champion!. Truck Driver Named Glen Region Worker of the Year 2008.Located 45 miles southeast of Watkins Glen in Sayre PA.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by webhound View Post
    Very cool, useful because my canister is in the way of my new high capacity filter.

    I know aquarium supply places have smaller check valves, any input on their suitability? The evap line on my Civic is 5/16 or maybe a little smaller.
    I know it said check valve but really what we need is an excess flow valve. Or perhaps a tip over valve like http://m.summitracing.com/parts/sum-220020

    I am thinking the over sized ball check will let vapor out but will stop the gas if the car turns over.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    I know it said check valve but really what we need is an excess flow valve. Or perhaps a tip over valve like http://m.summitracing.com/parts/sum-220020

    I am thinking the over sized ball check will let vapor out but will stop the gas if the car turns over.
    precisely the idea - let vapors out but keep liquid fuel in. a ball under a conical seat is the typical design, that's what many of the fuel cell roll over valved vents use.

    fuel safe makes a good 3/8" in-line roll over valve available from any fuel safe dealer. it's PN RV38. good for guys keeping their stock tanks and plumbing where a valve made for a cell is harder to implement.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Chip

    Thanks!

    Looks like a deal at less than $20 and actually made for cars. and since I started this thread/mess I really ought to take care if this ......

    http://www.fuelsafe.com/store/vent-c...lves/rv38.html
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    107

    Default

    thanks tom....no I can clean up that engine bay! Ha

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Adam,

    Lane carries those Fuel Safe RV38's that Chris mentioned.

    I think i will get one there likely next trip to Chicago.

    Maybe St. Patrick's Day?
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Thanks for the update. I too had originally, by not so careful rules reading, removed the charcoal canister from my '87 16V. After everyone pointed out the error of this thinking I put it back in. Now I can officially remove it, non-trivial weight

    What isn't explicitly clear to me about these suggested check/vent valve solutions is the mounting requirements.
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/abt-tf350
    http://m.summitracing.com/parts/sum-220020
    http://www.fuelsafe.com/store/vent-c...lves/rv38.html

    Assuming that most cars are generally the same, some kind of plastic vent line from the tank to the charcoal/carbon canister, and the carbon canister can be packaged in any orientation, as can the hose between the fuel tank and canister, what are the installation requirements for these devices so they function correctly? Do the first two have to be installed vertically to function correctly? The Fuel Safe Vent Check Valve can be installed in any orientation, but it may not be advisable to install it in the engine compartment if that was where the OEM charcoal canister was mounted, since venting fuel vapors underhood might not be such a good idea......

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    107

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    Adam,

    Lane carries those Fuel Safe RV38's that Chris mentioned.

    I think i will get one there likely next trip to Chicago.

    Maybe St. Patrick's Day?
    Pick me up one dood!

  11. #111
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTIspirit View Post
    Thanks for the update. I too had originally, by not so careful rules reading, removed the charcoal canister from my '87 16V. After everyone pointed out the error of this thinking I put it back in. Now I can officially remove it, non-trivial weight

    What isn't explicitly clear to me about these suggested check/vent valve solutions is the mounting requirements.
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/abt-tf350
    http://m.summitracing.com/parts/sum-220020
    http://www.fuelsafe.com/store/vent-c...lves/rv38.html

    Assuming that most cars are generally the same, some kind of plastic vent line from the tank to the charcoal/carbon canister, and the carbon canister can be packaged in any orientation, as can the hose between the fuel tank and canister, what are the installation requirements for these devices so they function correctly? Do the first two have to be installed vertically to function correctly? The Fuel Safe Vent Check Valve can be installed in any orientation, but it may not be advisable to install it in the engine compartment if that was where the OEM charcoal canister was mounted, since venting fuel vapors underhood might not be such a good idea......
    the first 2 you linked are cell vents and will be a pain to mount on a line. in both cases the long end would be down into the cell. the fuel save RV38 MUST be mounted vertically, it's not a disriminatory valve, just a ball in a cone. mount it so the cone points roughly UP then the line will choke in a rollover. I mounted mine on the fire wall with an extension line after the valve venting out to a fender

  12. #112
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Falls Church, Va
    Posts
    248

    Default

    My Nissan has one already at the tank OEM (I saw it in the fuel system diagram)
    Enjoy,
    Bill

  13. #113
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EV View Post
    My Nissan has one already at the tank OEM (I saw it in the fuel system diagram)
    quite a few cars do, which is really why the new rule was approved. forcing the bulk of competitors to fit additional equipment was not the intention, I figure maybe 1/3 of current IT cars will actually need to add something.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •