Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 113

Thread: Removal of Charcoal Canisters (fuel tank vents) okay?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default Removal of Charcoal Canisters (fuel tank vents) okay?

    i pulled mine years ago to get rid of that pollution crap but now when looking at the rules, it seems that there is not as much "emissions" related as i seemed to recall.

    is this proper or do i need to find some parts?
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    What do the canisters do? I've never heard of these before.
    Dave Gran
    Real Roads, Real Car Guys – Real World Road Tests
    Go Ahead - Take the Wheel's Free Guide to Racing

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Mine came out as part of the fuel tank/pump/lines system that got replaced by a fuel cell. I'm not sure what clause one would use to take it out if the stock tank were retained, but I've never thought about it really...

    K

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gran racing View Post
    What do the canisters do? I've never heard of these before.
    hydrocarbon emissions vent from the fuel tank.

    when the car is not running, any fumes vent through the activated carbon. the carbon captures the fuel vapor.

    when you run the car again, it sucks air through the carbon and strips the hydrocarbons back and effectively regenerates it for the next time.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Isn't it essentially an emissions device?

    I had one, and removed it.....
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
    Isn't it essentially an emissions device?
    It is, but Tom's got a point...read the regs...

    somehow, I don't think anyone's going to lose sleep if you remove your wash...er, charcoal canister.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    it is an emission device but i have not seeing the rule that allows its removal.

    or is it a general issue in the GCR and not in the IT rules?
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Decatur , GA, USA
    Posts
    183

    Default

    It's always interesting when you go back and reread the rules you thought you knew. I think Tom is right. The only emission controls that are listed for removal are air pumps, EGR (and associated lines) and the catalytic convertor. Maybe Kirk's fuel cell rationale could be applied, but that seems a stretch.

    And I don't think there is any general language allowing emission control removal, since the amount of such removals that are allowed vary by category.

    Where's the smiley for letting sleeping dogs lie?
    Tom Lyttle
    Decatur, GA
    IT7 Mazda - 2006, 2008 SARRC Champion
    ITS Nissan 200SX - finally running correctly
    FP Ford Capri - waiting for a comp adjustment
    GT3 Dodge Daytona - what was I thinking?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    OMG Tom!! You've done it! We should now be able to officially remove the washer bottles because you've come up with a new item to supercede it.

    I promise to never look at your car wondering where the charcoal canister is. lol
    Dave Gran
    Real Roads, Real Car Guys – Real World Road Tests
    Go Ahead - Take the Wheel's Free Guide to Racing

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Yup, nothing is in there that allows the removal of any 'fuel tank/system' emmisions. Basically, any emmission device attached to your exhaust system is all you can touch IIRC.

    I 100% agree that if you put in a fuel cell, you can remove that and it's compnents and replaced with the cell and what it needs to function.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    ...I 100% agree that if you put in a fuel cell, you can remove that and it's compnents and replaced with the cell and what it needs to function.


    Yay! I'm not a dipshit this time...!

    K

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    the roll cage rules for IT are now part of this right?

    ROLL CAGES FOR GT AND PRODUCTION BASED CARS
    So my IT car is a "Production" based car, right?

    So then I can remove the canister per this right?

    Factory installed gas tank evaporative emission control devices must be removed from all Production and GT Category cars.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    743

    Default

    Opinions may vary...
    Ed Funk
    NER ITA CRX, ITB Civic, ITC CRX (wanna buy a Honda?)
    Smart as a horse, hung like Einstein!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tom91ita View Post
    So then I can remove the canister per this right?
    Good try, but...nope.

    When referring to the rollcages, it's actually read as "production based cars" (or, more accurately, "production-based"; note lower case, referring to a description of the vehicle); when referring to the evap systems it's "Production" (note capitalized pronoun, referring to a specific category).

    It *was* a good try, though.

    But, if it's legal to remove evap system with a fuel cell, and given IT is not required to conform to GCR fuel cell specs, then you can declare your stock tank a "fuel cell" and do whatever you want with it...

    Just remove the damn thing. No one gives a flying flip.

    GA

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    2,942

    Default

    My Cannister (long gone) was connected to the air filter housing for the stock carb. (Its purpose is to capture gas vapors when the car is shut off and cleanse them--not sure if they really work).

    Accordingly, it was removed since ITCS D 1 c permits the removal of air cleaner assemblies..and all kinds of oter stuff (including housings, etc) located ahead of the carb. It was in front of the carb, albeit inside the left fender.

    "Etc" is a good enough excuse.

    YMMV

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joeg View Post
    My Cannister (long gone) was connected to the air filter housing for the stock carb. (Its purpose is to capture gas vapors when the car is shut off and cleanse them--not sure if they really work).

    Accordingly, it was removed since ITCS D 1 c permits the removal of air cleaner assemblies..and all kinds of oter stuff (including housings, etc) located ahead of the carb. It was in front of the carb, albeit inside the left fender.

    "Etc" is a good enough excuse.

    YMMV
    The context of this thread is fuel tank 'emissions'.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    2,942

    Default

    Andy--Charcoal cannisters are also connected to fuel tanks.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joeg View Post
    Andy--Charcoal cannisters are also connected to fuel tanks.
    And that is the point. There is no provision in the rules to remove them.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Fl
    Posts
    193

    Default

    ???
    2. Those vehicles which have emission control devices removed and which are not registered and licensed for street operation may use any gasoline meeting the require- ments of GCR Section 9.3 Fuel.
    Chris Leone
    318i going STL!!!
    E36 ITS underconstruction(sold)
    84 944 ITS (sold)
    71 240z more than half way there/now GT2 bound!!
    ChrisLeonemotorsports.com
    Roll cages and fabrication

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Meaning what Chris?
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •