Results 1 to 20 of 171

Thread: August 2010 Fastrack

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    147

    Default August 2010 Fastrack

    is posted
    http://www.scca.com/documents/Fastra...strack-aug.pdf

    Looks like crankfire ignition remains allowed for use by only those cars which came so equipped from the factory, precluding older cars from using this same thing.

    Improved Touring
    1. #1450 and others (Multiple) Crank trigger ignition inputs
    The CRB thanks all who wrote on this topic for your input. No change to the sensor allowance will be recommended at this time.

  2. #2

    Default

    Looking at STL, how do people read the weight rule? Does a Miata sporting the 1839cc motor fall under 1900cc or 1800cc for weight? Either the Miatas shed 40 pounds or gain 90 vs. running in ITA. I assume you round up.
    EP 1990 Mazda RX-7 (used to be STU until the turbo cars scared me away, and STL rotary cars require too much ballast)
    ITS/T4 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    106

    Default

    G. Weight Requirements
    1. Minimum weights for cars with piston engines will be determined by 1.3 lbs/cc displacement for the installed engine (see following table). Displacement is determined by the factory displacement for the installed engine. Cars with 3 valves/cylinder engines may reduce their weight by 1 percent. Cars with 2 valves/cylinder engines may reduce their weight by 2 percent. For weight assignment purposes engine displacement will be rounded to the nearest 100cc (e.g., 2150cc = 2200cc and 2149cc = 2100cc).

    So 1839 goes down to 1800 at 2340 lbs.

    Dave

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    982

    Default

    I don't get it... Whats the intention of STL?
    Jeremy Billiel

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Canal Fulton, OH
    Posts
    291

    Default

    1. To allow many IT type cars to do more modifications and run nationals, without spending the money it would take to run STU.
    2. To get more money and cars for the nationals and runoffs.

    matt

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy Billiel View Post
    I don't get it... Whats the intention of STL?
    Me neither. Let's take the '87 GTI 16V for example. Published 1780cc, rounded to the nearest 100 is 1800cc*1.3lb/cc=2340lb, which is over 100lbs more than the ITA weight.

    Where does this STL class fit into the overall club/national racing class hierarchy?

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTIspirit View Post
    Me neither. Let's take the '87 GTI 16V for example. Published 1780cc, rounded to the nearest 100 is 1800cc*1.3lb/cc=2340lb, which is over 100lbs more than the ITA weight.

    Where does this STL class fit into the overall club/national racing class hierarchy?
    The way I read the rules, STL is IT only with Production-class motors. I think that's pretty exciting, I'm just wondering who's going to spend the money for a Prod motor for their IT car. It sounds like fun...but it also sounds like I'd be spending another $10k.
    EP 1990 Mazda RX-7 (used to be STU until the turbo cars scared me away, and STL rotary cars require too much ballast)
    ITS/T4 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTIspirit View Post
    Me neither. Let's take the '87 GTI 16V for example. Published 1780cc, rounded to the nearest 100 is 1800cc*1.3lb/cc=2340lb, which is over 100lbs more than the ITA weight.

    Where does this STL class fit into the overall club/national racing class hierarchy?
    You might consider using the weigt break for fwd strut suspension as well.

    And of course if you run an 8v you get a weight break as well.

    The way I read the brakes allowance, you need to request it.

    I think the class sounds fun. If I ever get my other B car done, I may convert the current one to this spec...
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •