Senior Member
FasTrack & IT rollcage crushboxes allowed?
http://www.scca.com/documents/Fastra...track-july.pdf
it was my understanding that mounting plates can be used to slightly elevate a main hoop so that there is a "box" under the roll bar. (i think i have seen various pics of this on this forum, frequently for Spec Miatas).
Allow roll cage mounting plate crush boxThank you for your input. The current requirements are adequate as written.
does this mean that they are not allowed or they are already allowed under the existing wording?
1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL
Senior Member
If I can add to the thread...
NOT ALLOWED BY CRB
Improved Touring
1. #1231 (Ian Stewart) Allow oil coolers
Not within class philosophy.
2. #1232 (Ian Stewart) Allow open radiators
Not within class philosophy.
3. #1233 (Ian Stewart) Oil pan baffles
Not within class philosophy.
Really??? I thought radiators were open with some limitations and oil pans/baffles/coolers were open as well.
Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
'92 Honda Civic Si
STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.
Senior Member
The way I read it, they are not saying no boxes, but they are saying adhere to the current written rule. Hard to know, not reading the request...
Senior Member
They are. All I can imagine is that this belongs in another class.... Though T gets radiators too correct?Originally Posted by mossaidis
Senior Member
NOT any more!
actually, i think Chris hit it on the head in that it was likely supposed to reference Touring and not "IT"
1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL
Senior Member
ITS1. #1226 (Paul Ethier) Reclassify Integra GSR to ITAThis car is classed appropriately in ITS.
Jeremy Billiel
Administrator
Driving a 2600-pound Integra is bad enough...driving a 2900-pound one would be Sisyphean... - GA
Senior Member
i recognize the reference (Sisyphean) but for some reason i read it as "sissy-fyin' "
1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL
Senior Member
The heading on that section is incorrect. These items are for Showroom Stock.
Sorry for the confusion,
Dave
Senior Member
Good to see we're now following the timetable on adjustments. Better late than never...
Senior Member
The crush boxes are mine. I wanted the rule to disallow the welding of boltin cages, right to the floor. Anyone that has done this , knows that it makes a punch through area around the weld. Any cage that sits on the floor should have some type of load spreader,IMHO. The crush box is one of the best methods/designs.
The current rule allows the crush box, but doen not reccomend them.
Mike Ogren /Protech.
Why would SCCA not recommend a verified and much safer way of mounting bolt in cages is beyond me. SCCA stays way behind the times in many ways.
Last edited by Flyinglizard; 07-06-2010 at 09:32 AM.
Mike Ogren , FWDracingguide.com, 352.4288.983 ,http://www.ogren-engineering.com/
Senior Member
Well, either your request was worded poorly, or somebody read it completely wrong, because what your post states, (disallow boltin cages frome being welded without crush boxes*) and what the summation of your letter is according to Fastrack (Allow crush boxes) is COMPLETELY different.
When I was on the ITAC, we'd get letters where we THOUGHT we knew what the writer meant, but, we had to go by his actual words, even though they were sometimes 'odd' or 'weird', just like racers have to read the words of the rule, and no inject 'intent' into them. Two way street on that.
I'd be interested to see the original letter that was sent to the ITAC.
*I'm not sure how disallowing the welding-in of them makes them any safer than merely bolting them in? I mean, if they're unsafe in your eyes when welded in why aren't they unsafe when bolted in? Isn't the punch through problem potentially the same?
Jake Gulick
CarriageHouse Motorsports
for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
New England Region
lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com
Senior Member
Mike, (now that I know you) I would disagree with your assertion that a box welded to the floor would disperse the load. If anything a box welded to the floor of a car would create, for lack of a better term, blades to cut through the floor. That floor, which has been heated to its melting point as well, will have been weakened by said welding. Flat plate, the bigger the better in area, and welded on more than one plane, IMHO, would be the best strategy.
Your milage may vary!
Chris Leone
318i going STL!!!
E36 ITS underconstruction(sold)
84 944 ITS (sold)
71 240z more than half way there/now GT2 bound!!
ChrisLeonemotorsports.com
Roll cages and fabrication
Senior Member
Welding the bolt in cage to the floor makes the perimeter of the weld a punch through point. The bolted in cage just sits on the floor. Bolting the cage over the carpet, spreads the load better but racers cant seem to leave the carpet in.
I am sure that it was worded poorly and also read poorly..The SCCA tech guy wrote it( maybe Kim?)
Chris; The crush box is a riser box that deflects, to load the rest of the cage legs.
The pad under the box/riser is 60% stitch welded, not 100%. The pad should go up the rocker and or along the sill plate.
I will send you a pic.
Mike Ogren , FWDracingguide.com, 352.4288.983 ,http://www.ogren-engineering.com/
Senior Member
The crushbox/pedestal has a flat surface of the same thickness as a floorplate, right? I've always wondered, what's to prevent the tube from punching through the flat surface of the crushbox?
Senior Member
The biggest problem with boxes is creating rule wording to govern their design and construction to be as safe as they can potentially be while avoiding their potential for being less safe than the current, de-facto plate on floor (knife edges on the HAZ as Chris pointed out). additionally, we have to have the "old guys" at tech make a ruling on them. plates are a simpler thing to govern and harder to do or judge wrong.
the wording of your letter may or may not have done your request justice, but it's a really difficult issue with the dispersed structure of SCCA.
Agreed that many bolt-ins are very unsafe without some sort of load distribution, particularly when welded.
Senior Member
The trick is to tie the box into multiple surfaces. You get more weld area and can connect to the sills and other panels that are thicker than the floor. And in my experience, the sheet used for boxes (this is Competition Cages in Hillsborough, NC) is way thicker than floor material.
EDIT - another shot, different car, same cage builder.
K
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks