Results 1 to 20 of 61

Thread: Impact Racing Products, was: "Very disturbing thread"

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Spooner, WI
    Posts
    87

    Default

    I always thought it was odd to name your personal safety racing gear company "Impact"... ...in racing, isn't that something you want to avoid? It's like naming an energy drink "Narcolepsy" or tooth paste "Decay".

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ligonier, PA, USA
    Posts
    1,676

    Default

    I should be able to get my belts back from Imapct before the 90 day deadline expires. :~) I for one trust Bill Simpson's products.
    Last edited by dj10; 03-27-2010 at 02:47 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Don’t anybody do anything rash. Give us a week or so to see how this plays out. I have already heard rumors that there may be a solution.
    As mentioned helmet are not affected they are Snell not SFI. This involves suits, nets and belts.
    Dick Patullo
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    721

    Default

    Guess it's time to sell Bill Simpson an M3 Bimmer that is actually a Ford Fusion but has M3 tags on it......LOL.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    i am likely not the only one but i sent an e-mail to John Bauer (SCCA Club Racing Technical Manager)


    John,

    Could you please provide me with a list of SFI certified products that will acceptable to SCCA for the useful life of the products?

    For example:

    Belts for 2 years as per the GCR.

    Suits as normal wear allows.

    Given that SFI can de-certify its previously certified products after my purchase, I want to ensure that I am buying something that both meets the rules and can be utilized for its expected useful life.

    Especially with regards to new equipment such as Head & Neck Restraints that have been recently mandated.

    It would be greatly appreciated if you could reply or post an advisory of SFI's policy implementation and its impact to our club.

    Thanks,

    Tom

    with link to SFI and quoted their release.

    i have a hard time believing that equipment bought before the "de-certification" date can retroactively be de-certified.

    but since SCCA essentially mandates several SFI approved pieces of safety equipment, i want to know what ones are SCCA approved pieces of SFI approved pieces.
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Note that the SFI claim is over fake labels, and it specifically does NOT state that the products don't actually meet the certification standards...just that the LABELS didn't come from SFI.

    Now, the products COULD be unsafe.... or not.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    161

    Default

    As a Quality Manager in an ISO 9001:2008 certified facility, this is very distressing. I hope that this can be resolved positively, but it doesn't look good. An old friend once told me that integrity is a gift you give to yourself.

    Mike

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •