Results 1 to 20 of 93

Thread: IT Motor Mounts, please send in your yes votes to the CRB

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Hendersonville, NC
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Tom,

    What is your rationale for this? I am with you, but I would like to know why you think this change is justfiied. Also, does it represent a competitive advantage for any cars?

    Tim B.
    timo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Falls Church, Va
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timo944 View Post
    Tom,

    What is your rationale for this? I am with you, but I would like to know why you think this change is justfiied. Also, does it represent a competitive advantage for any cars?

    Tim B.
    I am sure he will chime in but for my car, the loosey goosey motor mounts cause me to have issues down shifting at times, so for my car, sure it will be a "competitive advantage" (of sorts).

    The overly soft engine mounts do fine for the street, but present problems when used as we do. In some cases (many) factory mounts have to be replaced yearly, and cost MUCH more than stiffer, better performing poly mounts, that will last longer (cost savings).

    Of course, many already run them, and everyone seems to turn a blind eye (a noobs perspective). Just about any SM that double dips in ITA has the upgraded mounts SM allows, and I am pretty sure no one is protesting. I know that isn't a reason to pass the rule, but it is, what it is.
    Enjoy,
    Bill

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rockville, MD
    Posts
    274

    Default

    I've replaced five or six radiators and a couple dozen motor mounts in my Benz due to their crappy design. I'd like to see this rule changed.
    Chuck

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro,N.C. U.S.A.
    Posts
    485

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by callard View Post
    I've replaced five or six radiators and a couple dozen motor mounts in my Benz due to their crappy design. I'd like to see this rule changed.
    Chuck
    I spun in my own oil when one of my "fluid dampening" motor mounts broke.

    ... Just sent in my vote............ YES

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hotshoe View Post
    I spun in my own oil when one of my "fluid dampening" motor mounts broke.

    ... Just sent in my vote............ YES
    And we share mounts with the M3, imagine what it'd be like if we had to use the softer mounts from the regular sedan.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    http://roadraceautox.com/showthread.php?t=28388

    Some recent news and discussion can be found here regarding the now controversial engine mount situation.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Synopsis? I'd prefer to see discussion on a proposed Improved Touring rule at, well, the Improved Touring forum. Or, at a minimum on the SCCA forum...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lateapex911 View Post
    http://roadraceautox.com/showthread.php?t=28388

    Some recent news and discussion can be found here regarding the now controversial engine mount situation.
    That's some really entertaining reading right there.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •