Originally Posted by
Andy Bettencourt
I am not sure there is a specific problem Dick. I think the membership could be better served if the NARRC series was run independent of the individual (and sometimes conflicting) agendas of each of the Regions.
It's a concept that has been being bounced around for a few years at least.
One of the things I love about the Narrc series’ organizational structure is how efficient it is. The four regions that run Narrc do it with just two meetings a year, in conjunction with the Divisional meeting when the key people have to be in the same place anyway. Of course there are a few additional volunteers, points, reserved numbers, treasurer and secretary. Everything else just piggybacks on existing races put on by the regions.
Has the Narrc committee ever gone down the wrong road, sure, but over the long history of the series I think it has served the racing community pretty well and I think it has been pretty responsive to input.
In the very bureaucratic environment of SCCA I think the governing of Narrc works pretty well.
dick patullo
ner scca IT7 Rx7
Bookmarks