ITAC and CRB and the Process

[RedMisted]

Make sure letters regarding the CRB are sent to the [email protected] also. Letters sent through the www.CRBSCCA.com website DO NOT go to the BOD.


Raymond "Thanks Dick for the updates, I know that the entire lurking IT community appreciates it" Blethen

I sent my e-letter last night to [email protected]. Does this mean that they didn't get it? I may have to retype my letter...

[lateapex911]

I'm not sure what happens to letters that go to the old address. I would think that they should either have an automatic reply that tells you to go to the new site and enter it there, OR it should happen automatically. NO response indicating that it is a dead end would be wrong.

No need to retype for the BoD, just get it from your sent folder copy and paste it with the correct address.

[Knestis]

If you compose a letter in Word (or whatever), paste it into Notepad or some other simple text editing application, and read/edit it there first. Then cut it out and paste it into the form. That will strip out all of the formatting etc. that dorks it up. Or just type it in Notepad, but then you lose spell-check, which I kind of count on...

K

[ddewhurst]

Approx three weeks ago I sent a letter to the old CRB address with ZERO response. Several days after no response I called & was given the new CRB address. Then received a notice with tracking number. Nothing is tied together & to my knowledge the new address is not (was not at the time) tied to the rules making process writeup.

Resend your letter.

[lateapex911]

Is it me, or does having an auto reply on an email that isn't used anymore just seem like simple common sense? I mean, it it that hard?

[spnkzss]

Is it me, or does having an auto reply on an email that isn't used anymore just seem like simple common sense? I mean, it it that hard?

The last time I sent an email to [email protected] I got a response back saying to go to the web site.

[JoshS]

Right, my guess is that the auto-response is working, but that they end up caught in most people's spam filters.

[tnord]

Is it me, or does having an auto reply on an email that isn't used anymore just seem like simple common sense? I mean, it it that hard?

i got an auto reply. :026:

[RedMisted]

I'm not sure what happens to letters that go to the old address. I would think that they should either have an automatic reply that tells you to go to the new site and enter it there, OR it should happen automatically. NO response indicating that it is a dead end would be wrong.

No need to retype for the BoD, just get it from your sent folder copy and paste it with the correct address.

Well, nothing has come back, and I did not get any request to redirect mail. So I'll assume the CRB got my complaint. But to be sure, guess I'll resend my letter through one of the "official" channels...

[dickita15]

If you have not heard anything I would defiantly resend it. The item I had in February Fastrack was sent by email in May and other than an email saying they received it I had heard no more. In December the SCCA staff loaded my letter in the system and I got a tracking number.

[IPRESS]

Just asking, but has anyone ever sent a letter to the CRB saying: "Thanks, you are doing a good job?"

I know that is not the sentiment right now on here, but I was talking to another racer today and the question came up.

[dickita15]

Well the BOD has received only 21 letters, all in support of the process.

[Andy Bettencourt]

Well the BOD has received only 21 letters, all in support of the process.

That's an effin' landslide in letter-dom.

[lateapex911]

Well the BOD has received only 21 letters, all in support of the process.

Yes, in the week since Andy and i resigned, that seems like a significant amount. Does that include our resignation letters?

You said "only"....what would be considered "significant" or "a lot" in the BoDs eyes?

[Knestis]

Well the BOD has received only 21 letters, all in support of the process.

Eh. They're all from internet agitators. And there's hundreds - thousands, maybe - of IT entrants in the US. So close to zero as to effectively, uh, zero.

K