Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: so what e36 chassis is the prefered one to build?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    517

    Default

    i'm sure the Z3's are a blast... however donor's don't turn up at a reasonable price (to me).

    so is the '92 considered better because of the dual valve springs? what advantage does that offer?
    hoop
    Greensboro, NC
    STL Newbie

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Also the Z3 has semi trailing arms. Which can make the car even more fun to drive, but I think the multilink that the E36 uses is more tuneable and more drivable.
    I'm under the impression that '94 is the year to get because it has Vanos. You might want to check on that.
    John Norris
    #07 ITS/R BMW 325is
    #07 ITS BMW 325
    Sponsors:
    GREEN FLASH BEER
    GT International BMW Service since 1976

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Tijeras, NM
    Posts
    579

    Default

    The 92 is the only year without VANOS, and is also down half a point on compression.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Donner car's not as important as it used to be, becuse you can use any of the e-36 motors as long as the chassis is the same.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    23

    Default

    e36 non vanos's are not better just different. With the vanos motor you have the stock valve springs which are not that strong and if you bring a car up to redline alot they can break. Alot of people cheat and use the larger e36 m3 one that are tapered and that resolves the issue, however just saying the the 92 non-vanos has the dual ones from the factory. With the new vin rule you could really get any chassis and then pair up a motor and classify the car at that point. ITR is def up and coming and ITS is dying out.
    Last edited by hondaman321; 02-04-2010 at 08:01 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    517

    Default

    so from a reliability standpoint, the earlier head is more durable than the later design. i'm familiar with the vin rule, that's how i changed the CRX to ITB.
    hoop
    Greensboro, NC
    STL Newbie

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    23

    Default

    the two engines are very similar. I was just letting you know the difference, however since the vanos motor was around longer it may be better to go with that option 93-95 e36 and i believe 92-95 e34. The non-vanos was only in 92 e36 and early e34's so they are not as common if you need replacement and I think the ecu's are different and harder to come by.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3

    Default

    OK, so I'm hooked on the ITR/ITS group. I had never driven a BMW until I got a 325 in a trade a few weeks ago and I was impressed. It is now my daily driver. I just purchased a 1996 328 from an insurance auction for the interior and have decided to cage it for ITR. The engine has a rod sticking out the side so if anyone wants to sell one let me know. Anyone want to give up their info on shock/spring/bar info? Any help is appreciated!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •