i think i actually read thru the CRB minutes and missed the title of that section. so i apologize and if there is a way to change the title of the thread, a mod should feel free.
however, the minutes section were not, in my mind, "minutes" as much as they are a list of decisions.
and since some of the information in forums and e-mails seems to be conflicting, there is no place in SportsCar that i have seen that has minutes of what transpired between the CRB and the various liasion committees/members.
and maybe that is as it needs to be, that is, if SportsCar cannot cover regional racing results due to costs of paper, ink, production, etc., they don't want details of who voted how and maybe fewer would volunteer for positions if they got grief individually for their decisions.
but like ray, i would like to know part of the "why; behind the decisions.
there seems to be things that are inconsistent such as the following;
ITB/ITC – Run the ITM 914 and ITC 914 through the process (Meredith). These cars are classed appropriately.
Touring/Showroom Stock
1. T3 – Reduce the BMW Z4 weight (Leithauser). The car is at the correct process weight. We will continue to monitor the car’s performance.
one request to use a process results in a response that simply says the car is correct whereas another request to change weight says the car is at the proper weight per a process. i realize that these are different classes but it still reads odd that a process is used or not used based on what?
and if i had just read the table of contents, i would have seen the CRB listed! Doh!
CONTENTS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1
CLUB RACING 37
CRB Minutes 37
Memorandum 44
Technical Bulletin 44
Court of Appeals 56
Time Trials Administrative Council None
SOLO 59
SEB Minutes 59
RALLY 62
RoadRally 62
RallyCross 63
QUICK LINKS 65
1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL
Bookmarks