In the rear, anyone sporting a 4.88 set on a second gen? Just wondering how the difference was/felt before looking at one
In the rear, anyone sporting a 4.88 set on a second gen? Just wondering how the difference was/felt before looking at one
A big gear is a necessity on these cars. Most guys run a 4.88 or a 5.12...there might be a few 4.30s too. I guess it really depends on the tracks you plan to race on, but the lack of torque these motors produce means we gotta rev the snot out of 'em and put in a big gear.
or a smaller tire?
Used gears are very hard to find. 5.12 is the best all around gear but 4.88 is next in line. They never made any gears except a 3.9, 4.1, and 3.39 that bolt into these cars. All the other ratios must be custom made for them. I have the 4.88 and 5.12 in stock ready to bolt in or can do the modification to the various gear sets that fit. Just giving you some options, not pushing my products.
Steve Eckerich
ITS 18 Speedsource RX7
ITR RX8 (under construction)
.
I don't know anyone that is running other than 488's or 512's
We did the calculations and found that one could be better
than another at one track, and visa versa at another, based
only on how many shifts you need to make...
for example, at NJMP Lightning we are on the shift light in 4th
(8300rpm) near start/finish on 488's with 45 tires, we then
keep accelerating on the light to the braking zone. If we
were on 512's with 45's we would need to go to 5th gear.
On the other hand, we could go to 512's with 50 series tires
and end up with almost the same ratio.....and since it is easier
to change tires than diffs, 512's seem like a better choice...
circumference / diff ratio = inches of travel per revolution of the driveshaft
((225*0.45*2/25.4) + 15)*3.14 = 72.1 / 4.88 = 14.78
((225*0.50*2/25.4) + 15)*3.14 = 74.9 / 5.12 = 14.63
But at Pocono, we all need 5th gear, so in that case you
might be able to tweak the performance with 488's to be better
with different tire choices.....
and then again....but in the case of....and conversely...
Bottom line: the 488s were cheaper so we have them in both cars
.
Glenn Lawton
GSMmotorsports
#14 ITS RX7
NARRC ITS Champion 2012
NERRC ITS Champion 2013 12 11 10 09 08
NERRC STU Champion 2010
__________________
.
of course, my calculations make the following simplifying assumptions:
1. That the increase circumference due to increase in tire
pressure during a race is exactly offset by the decrease in
circumference due to tire wear
2. That we discount the both the effect of decreased circumference
at higher altitudes due to the reduced effect of the pressure
differential of inside/outside tires, and the effect of increased
circumference due to the change in gravitational force on the
tire casing based on the distance to the center of mass of the earth...
3. That we ignore any relatavistic foreshortening of the tire
as the speed of the RX7 approaches the speed of light....
oh wait...I think I hear my adopted cousin...
.
Glenn Lawton
GSMmotorsports
#14 ITS RX7
NARRC ITS Champion 2012
NERRC ITS Champion 2013 12 11 10 09 08
NERRC STU Champion 2010
__________________
Correct Mark, it is 4.37 I believe. Have to count teeth I guess. I sold the last used 5.12 I had at Barber so all I have are new. Mazda is now over $700 for the 5.12 before we do the modification. They are expensive but it should last forever if you just change the fluid after every other race.
Steve Eckerich
ITS 18 Speedsource RX7
ITR RX8 (under construction)
Bookmarks