Seems like we have a three step re-evaluation process:

1. Determine if car needs further scrutiny.

On track performance is used as a trigger for further research on a car.

2. Gather data and evidence.

What is the evidence? Dyno sheets still seem to be the only true data, but, as has been pointed out, those can be manipulated unless gotten in a controlled environment. Is lower compression evidence? Is longer cam duration evidence?

3. Set new weight.

Presumably, the idea is that the 25% number would be increased to whatever is determined by the evidence in step 2.


Did I leave something out? Step 2 is still where we have the problems.