Big Picture of IT - Share Your Opinions

[Ron Earp]

You, the interested IT racer, can, no, should weigh in.

If you think the FIRST PRINCIPALS (in the classification procedure) should be consistency, transparency, repeatability, and that subjectivity should be used only with hard data as a back up, and that on track performance should be used as a trigger to go get hard data, well, tell them that.

If you prefer that we continue to use the process as before, but use our intuition when the numbers it spits out don't look right, tell them that.

Sorry. I thought you wanted to know what I, the racer, thought about IT and the rules set. It appears you want me to affirm, or not affirm, the direction the ITAC is going.

[lateapex911]

Sorry. I thought you wanted to know what I, the racer, thought about IT and the rules set. It appears you want me to affirm, or not affirm, the direction the ITAC is going.

Actually, Ron, your list is quite valid. My post was aimed more to folks up the line who seemed to be saying, "What's in it for me". Kirk made the point that the re classifications that you, the member at large, have requested, have been stalled, and that you the member should be aware of that. And that the reasoning appears to be that there is distrust with the methods used to create the results.

I found the "Well, it depends, if the new process adds weight to my car then I ain't in support of it" response to be missing the point.