Results 1 to 20 of 572

Thread: Big Picture of IT - Share Your Opinions

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    There has been and continues to be significant discussion about AWD. There are basically three 'camps" I see on the ITAC on this issue:

    1. One group says class the cars, at least 2-3 people have written in wanting specifically to class an N/A AWD car so they can build it. That group feels like that is enough to justify doing it.

    2. A second group sees it as a cost benefit analysis. There are so few N/A AWD cars as to create only a small benefit by classing them. On the downside, classing AWD cars will be difficult because we don't fully understand their handling dynamics, and whether (a) there actually is a handling "penalty" in the dry and (b) how much of an advantage AWD is in the wet.

    3. A third group is adamantly opposed based on the perceived advantage AWD has in the rain.

    Right now, it's stalled due to the significant split into the three groups I list above.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
    There has been and continues to be significant discussion about AWD. There are basically three 'camps" I see on the ITAC on this issue:

    1. One group says class the cars, at least 2-3 people have written in wanting specifically to class an N/A AWD car so they can build it. That group feels like that is enough to justify doing it.

    2. A second group sees it as a cost benefit analysis. There are so few N/A AWD cars as to create only a small benefit by classing them. On the downside, classing AWD cars will be difficult because we don't fully understand their handling dynamics, and whether (a) there actually is a handling "penalty" in the dry and (b) how much of an advantage AWD is in the wet.

    3. A third group is adamantly opposed based on the perceived advantage AWD has in the rain.

    Right now, it's stalled due to the significant split into the three groups I list above.
    Why not class it "normally" then? the disadvantage in the dry gets cancelled out by the wet advantage?

    I've been racing right about 20 years now, most of that in IT, and for me it mostly trying to keep up with the constant rule changes and the incredibly anal debate over so much of them. Right now, I'm having more fun in Lemons where its my driving and pit work that matters, not the car.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •