One thing I noticed was that it appears that IT isn't the only category that uses a process to set spec weights.
One thing I noticed was that it appears that IT isn't the only category that uses a process to set spec weights.
So the August Fastrack came out today, and I see nothing regarding IT other than a front spoiler/air dam issue from the Court of Appeals. Did I miss something?
EP 1990 Mazda RX-7 (used to be STU until the turbo cars scared me away, and STL rotary cars require too much ballast)
ITS/T4 2004 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V
how do we find out what came out of the last meeting?
Officially, you have to wait for it to be published. What the ITAC does is really at the beck & call of the CRB, they actually make the decisions ... the ITAC only provides recommendations.
Unofficially if you want to know what we recommended, talk to an ITAC member privately.
Josh Sirota
ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe
So I guess it is time we spoke with our BOD reps to see what the holdup is. Gets a little old to have an ITAC that is doing something and a CRB sitting on their collective asses with other more important issues. Given the list of items that have been discussed on this board and the total lack of IT items in fastrack there is something going on behind closed doors. I know some of the CRB visit this board so how about an explanation please.
Steve Eckerich
ITS 18 Speedsource RX7
ITR RX8 (under construction)
Bookmarks