Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 64

Thread: Looking for in-car VIR group 6 incident

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI, USA
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    Very interesting to hear that, Kirk! I'll have to go back and watch that vid again! I've sent the comment through to my wife, who took all the video.

    It's both amusing and interesting/timely discussion; we were just having the conversation last night about how you can potentially get a killer (not jumped) start from the back, what the GCR says, and then what the heck do you do with all that speed when you're at a very narrow track like VIR or Waterford, with just 2 lanes of asphalt... She's a Novice this year, having just gone through school 2 weeks ago... so we pretty much came to the conclusion that "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should!!"
    Vaughan Scott
    Detroit Region #280052
    '79 924 #77 ITB
    #65 Hidari Firefly P2
    www.vaughanscott.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    Nuttin' but love Chris. I was soooo glad it didn't impact you. Finally replaced my bumper - damn those must be some long wheel studs. lol
    Dave Gran
    Real Roads, Real Car Guys – Real World Road Tests
    Go Ahead - Take the Wheel's Free Guide to Racing

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Ok, after reading some of the comments here I have to ask: do most of you guys think there are times when it's ok to go off track intentionally? I'm not talking about avoiding contact, or other emergency situations, but driving off into the dirt to pass someone, or to maintain your position? Is that really ok? If so I need to adjust my way of thinking.
    Earl R.
    240SX
    ITA/ST5

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colchester, CT, USA
    Posts
    2,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erlrich View Post
    Ok, after reading some of the comments here I have to ask: do most of you guys think there are times when it's ok to go off track intentionally? I'm not talking about avoiding contact, or other emergency situations, but driving off into the dirt to pass someone, or to maintain your position? Is that really ok? If so I need to adjust my way of thinking.


    Yes*




    *IF you're talking two wheels. Like any other situation you better be damn sure you're making the right decision though. Four?? Not a good idea (in my opinion)



    Hell, I saw Fangio do all four in the grass to make a pass in a Prototype. If he can do it, I certainly can do!!!!

    Kidding, KIDDING!!!




    .
    Jeff L

    ITA Miata



    2010 NARRC Champion

    2007 NERRC Championship, 2nd place
    2008 NARRC Championship, 2nd place
    2009 NARRC Championship, 2nd place

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    >> "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should!!"

    Good advice pretty much any time one is on the track.

    At the start, the onus is ALWAYS on the driver who gets a good run to have a way to resolve it.

    In my case, there was pavement to work with, but it became quickly occupied by sideways car. I had to choose the best of three bad options (try to squeak past Dave's bumper, which I actually snagged in the process; vs. broadside him having slowed however much I could or turning left into the wall). I put myself in that situation with the run at the green, I had to deal with it, and I bear responsiblity regardless of what goes wrong or what led to the mess.

    The real lesson though (I think) is that this is the case IRRESPECTIVE of details re: who got how good of a start. It's a lot easier to work out the details if all of the cars in a given space are getting there at about the same speed but that's pretty much never going to be the case on the start.

    I might be in the minority on this but I'd suggest that starters do NOT do us any favors by waiting to see if things are formed up and tight before throwing the flag - particularly with a big field. It's a bit of a generalization but, the later the green, the more opportunity the snake has to get coiled up and ready to strike.

    It's a subtle distinction but I'd propose that their real responsibility is to get the race underway safely, rather than forcing the field to look pretty. And starters who get preoccupied with the "Hah hah!" games, worrying more about surprising us with the flag than about getting us underway, are frankly not paying attention to the most important aspect of their job.

    I'd way prefer an early, messy start to a late start with the front rows tightly bunched up.

    K

    EDIT - A thousand years ago in the ITC Alliance days, I got a whopper of a run from DFL in a big pack at Portland. In THAT case, in all probablity, I DID jump the start because all I had to go by was the increase in noise from the other side of the slough (no radio, couldn't see the flag). I was driver's right (inside of the last turn onto the straight) but - BUMMER - had to come to a COMPLETE STOP to get back in line at the end: They people in front of me were nose-to-tail and running right along the end of the then-brand-new "pro pits" wall on the infield side of the straight, I couldn't get in, and the end of the pits was covered by a (slightly) angled Jersey barrier. I'm lucky that I was driving a slow car.
    Last edited by Knestis; 05-12-2009 at 10:52 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    I might be in the minority on this but I'd suggest that starters do NOT do us any favors by waiting to see if things are formed up and tight before throwing the flag - particularly with a big field. It's a bit of a generalization but, the later the green, the more opportunity the snake has to get coiled up and ready to strike.

    It's a subtle distinction but I'd propose that their real responsibility is to get the race underway safely, rather than forcing the field to look pretty. And starters who get preoccupied with the "Hah hah!" games, worrying more about surprising us with the flag than about getting us underway, are frankly not paying attention to the most important aspect of their job.

    I'd way prefer an early, messy start to a late start with the front rows tightly bunched up.

    K
    I agree 100%. I assume all regions do this, but I know in the DC region the corner workers start calling in the condition of the field several turns before start (typically T8 at Summit). The starter knows what the field looks like long before they come into sight. As best I can tell, our starters are pretty good about getting the flag out as early as possible; I think they usually have it waving by the time the lead cars hit pit out.
    Earl R.
    240SX
    ITA/ST5

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    >> I might be in the minority on this but I'd suggest that starters do NOT do us any favors by waiting to see if things are formed up and tight before throwing the flag - particularly with a big field. It's a bit of a generalization but, the later the green, the more opportunity the snake has to get coiled up and ready to strike.

    It's a subtle distinction but I'd propose that their real responsibility is to get the race underway safely, rather than forcing the field to look pretty. And starters who get preoccupied with the "Hah hah!" games, worrying more about surprising us with the flag than about getting us underway, are frankly not paying attention to the most important aspect of their job.

    I'd way prefer an early, messy start to a late start with the front rows tightly bunched up.

    K
    You can throw a late green if everybody can see the stand - say at a Roval where the stand is miles above the pavement. At most places we run, the guys in the back will never see the flag and are either guessing or keying on the cars at front. A late start will be fine, if the nuts holding the wheels aren't playing games, but that's not the case usually.

    You'll get someone in row 4 leave a gap and get on the throttle early in an attempt to get a jump, everyone behind gets on the throttle, even if only to maintain their spacing on him. Gapper needs to roll off the throttle, and everybody behind accordians...

    I think part of the problem for this particular race was that few, if any, of the groups maintained pace car speed when it dove for the track. Probably a consequence of everyone knowing that there was no way there would be a waveoff. It takes so long to do another pace lap that I imagine you could have cars barrel-rolling prior to the green and still get a green.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    I might be in the minority on this but I'd suggest that starters do NOT do us any favors by waiting to see if things are formed up and tight before throwing the flag - particularly with a big field. It's a bit of a generalization but, the later the green, the more opportunity the snake has to get coiled up and ready to strike.
    I cannot say that I disagree but Starters are aware that the sooner they give the green the faster the speeds are in the first turn when it gets tight and cars start bouncing off each other.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dickita15 View Post
    I cannot say that I disagree but Starters are aware that the sooner they give the green the faster the speeds are in the first turn when it gets tight and cars start bouncing off each other.
    Out here when we have 50-60 car fields, we often find that unless the front row goes very slow and the green comes late, the back of the back hasn't even caught up and formed up by the time the green comes out. The back of the pack won't even be on the front straight yet.

    When I was in the slowest class in the group instead of the fastest class, I used to really welcome those late greens, so that maybe we could get a proper 2-by-2 start.
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Yea, I'm with you Josh. I wrecked in qualifying once and had to start 67th of 69 at Watkins Glen. At the time the starters stand was near the beginning of the straight, and I bet maybe 6 rows were ON the straight when the green waved. I was two corners away, and I guessed we were going..because I had found a car with a radio antenna on it, and keyed off him.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dickita15 View Post
    I cannot say that I disagree but Starters are aware that the sooner they give the green the faster the speeds are in the first turn when it gets tight and cars start bouncing off each other.
    Fair enough.

    Josh also points out that the pace car - and the FIELD - has an obligation to get it organized on the pace lap. The reason that I was in the position I was at Mid-O is that the row ahead of me was dawdling all the way around almost to the carousel (scrubbing tires, mostly).

    K

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    This is why IMO we need to reinforce to the starters that it is OK, actually preferred, and IMO safer to wave a bad group off.

    Even if there is a split start.

    Even if it is a 4 mile track.
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shwah View Post
    This is why IMO we need to reinforce to the starters that it is OK, actually preferred, and IMO safer to wave a bad group off.

    Even if there is a split start.

    Even if it is a 4 mile track.
    Even if it the day is behind schedule...?

    By leave the pavement (I beileve it's racing surface in the GCR), I presume you mean all four off??
    That's always been my operational understanding.

    K
    Last edited by Knestis; 05-13-2009 at 07:48 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    Even if it the day is behind schedule...?


    K
    Did this result help out with the schedule?

    Yes regardless of schedule. Not following our own rules for the rolling start is a dangerous practice, literally.
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knestis View Post
    Even if it the day is behind schedule...?
    Isn't that why races have a number of laps and max time to keep it from getting behind schedule. The pulling of cars after a session slows the day down more than a wave-off.

    Quote Originally Posted by shwah View Post
    This is why IMO we need to reinforce to the starters that it is OK, actually preferred, and IMO safer to wave a bad group off.

    Even if there is a split start.

    Even if it is a 4 mile track.
    FWIW they did wave off at least one start this weekend. One of the open wheel groups was waved off.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cooleyjb View Post
    FWIW they did wave off at least one start this weekend. One of the open wheel groups was waved off.
    True, but only because they needed to send an EV to retrieve a sports racer that parked on track during the pace lap.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    682

    Default

    Looks like some folks might want to re-read GCR 6.8.3. As an SIT, if I had seen this from the tower (which is admittedly difficult because of the pit wall hindering line of sight in this case), I would have certainly reported it to the Chief Steward. It would then be his/her call to issue a CSA (Chief Steward's Action).

    Essentially it says if you leave the pavement during competition and gain an advantage, said advantage can be rescinded by the Chief Steward. This applies at the start as well.

    MC

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by racer14itc View Post
    Looks like some folks might want to re-read GCR 6.8.3. As an SIT, if I had seen this from the tower (which is admittedly difficult because of the pit wall hindering line of sight in this case), I would have certainly reported it to the Chief Steward. It would then be his/her call to issue a CSA (Chief Steward's Action).

    Essentially it says if you leave the pavement during competition and gain an advantage, said advantage can be rescinded by the Chief Steward. This applies at the start as well.

    MC
    Are you refering to the staters stand or the pagoda? I've been in the that starters stand, and you can see everything.
    hoop
    Greensboro, NC
    STL Newbie

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iambhooper View Post
    Are you refering to the staters stand or the pagoda? I've been in the that starters stand, and you can see everything.
    hoop,

    it all depends are where either the Chief Steward is located at that moment, or what the starter and/or start judge see. The start judge should be on the starter's stand as well.

    I was not there so I can't speak as to why no action was taken.

    MC
    Mark Coffin
    #14 FP VW Scirocco
    Former ITC roustabout...

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by racer14itc View Post
    Looks like some folks might want to re-read GCR 6.8.3. As an SIT, if I had seen this from the tower (which is admittedly difficult because of the pit wall hindering line of sight in this case), I would have certainly reported it to the Chief Steward. It would then be his/her call to issue a CSA (Chief Steward's Action).

    Essentially it says if you leave the pavement during competition and gain an advantage, said advantage can be rescinded by the Chief Steward. This applies at the start as well.

    MC
    By leave the pavement (I beileve it's racing surface in the GCR), I presume you mean all four off??
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •