Results 1 to 20 of 91

Thread: Correction to 5/09 Fastrack

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    366

    Default

    When V8 cars in ITR was originally proposed the subject came up at our region's race group meeting. The AS drivers were really against the idea. They saw this as cutting into their numbers....and numbers are very important to National Class drivers. They really couldn't see the value in a second pony car class.

    I see it differently. What has been created is an AS farm system that will benefit AS and ITR car builders equally. AS will benefit because some ITR drivers may eventually want to go faster and they can in AS.

    For example, an ITR driver with an eye on eventually running in AS can get started on track for a lower cost. While they learn race craft in IT they can also be make strategic build decisions like choosing 16x8 wheels instead of 17X8.5 wheels. Plus alot of the IT allowed parts translate to AS such as headers, oil pans, accu-sumps, fuel cells, suspension bushings, shocks, springs, etc. So there is no real loss of investment.

    ITR car owners will benefit because the market for their cars is bigger than just the IT crowd when they want to sell.

    Despite my misgivings regarding the weights that were determined I think there are allot of positives here for IT and the club as a whole. Good job to all involved.
    Scott Peterson
    KC Region
    83 RX7
    STU #17

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    beaverton , oregon
    Posts
    42

    Default

    did you know that the 89-92 5.0 had forged pistons wear the 93 had hypertenic. i have a 88 5.0 which is not classed mine has an older FI system that does not use a maf. mine has 244whp and 291 wtq and everything ive done is all IT legal. ive stoped tracking it because of cost i would replace the brakes durring lunch every time. have blown up 3 oil pumps becauce i used the trans to help slow the car down. only way to keep the brakes for 20mins on track. on street tires i was only about 1 second off the lead of ITS here in portland (PIR). there are next to none ITR cars here so i could make it and race it but any advantage i would have down the straights would be gone when i have to brake 500-700 feet sooner then my compeditors. i was just going to put cobra brakes on it then it would brake about the same as my bmw 328 hey isnt that an ITR car too. the 328 brakes about the 400ft mark where my mustang brakes at start finish with is about 1400 ft from the cornner

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Sounds like we probably got the balance pretty close, with the various strengths and weaknesses you describe. Thanks!

    K

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •