Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: Honda Civic 92-95 advice : add-ons

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default Honda Civic 92-95 advice : add-ons

    It's nice to know I have a tax rebate coming.... I finished midpack at NHMS and I am looking to upgrade parts before LRP or perhaps 5/9 POC.

    1) Tires; I have 2 year old Toyos mounted now - I am thinking SM6, 225/50 Toyo's or 225/45 R6. I would consider the GYs but I can't seem to find prices online (I probably need to call around). Does anyone have prices on new AB special GYs?

    2) FD; 4.7, 4.9 or 5.1? I currently have the stock 4.25 FD. Something new from Mfactory would do nice. So, my question is how fast do you ITA boys run at the end of the straights at LRP (before Big bend) and WGI (before the bus stop)?

    3) Airdam; I thought a ordered an airdam from Roadracegear.com - but though some oddities including ownership transfers I have not heard anything or gotten anything from those guys. Does anyone have a reputitable airdam fab company that makes an IT legal airdam for EG civic (92-95)? or am I stuck making one out of alum and plaster out of my garage?

    Peace,
    Mickey
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Don't forget Gear-X also for the a 4.7 or 4.9 FD, I can make you a deal on them.

    BoneSpec Transmissions
    Honda D-series tranny specialist

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    track time
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bonespec View Post
    Don't forget Gear-X also for the a 4.7 or 4.9 FD, I can make you a deal on them.

    I have heard good things about Gear-X as well. Need to make a decision on ratio... hmmm. Any guys from the northeast want to charm in on their speeds before the end of the busstop at WGI, the chicane at POC and big bend at LRP?
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dickita15 View Post
    track time
    I'm already ahead of you. I am for scheduled 8-9 NARRC events in my first year! Plus I have 25 days on the resume already (it's NOT alot but it's something...) I need PARTS/TIRES for more car potential and NUTS so that I don't slow down when going into the south oval or the carousel at WGI.
    Last edited by mossaidis; 04-24-2009 at 04:11 PM.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    142

    Default

    this table is very helpfull only thing you have to change is the tire diameter...

    http://www.fatboyraceworks.com/gears...raph&Compare=1

    That should help you decided on what you want/need.

    FYI speed (mph) is a horrible thing to judge your speed with, stock speedo's are off a bunch and then the tires OD makes it even worse. the stock tach isn't any better put most people have an after market tach, which is the best thing to use to judge your speed.

    As far as airdamns go this is the best on the market

    http://www.specialprojectsms.com/index.php?productID=93

    for more pictures search honda-tech.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mossaidis View Post
    3) Airdam; I thought a ordered an airdam from Roadracegear.com - but though some oddities including ownership transfers I have not heard anything or gotten anything from those guys. Does anyone have a reputitable airdam fab company that makes an IT legal airdam for EG civic (92-95)? or am I stuck making one out of alum and plaster out of my garage?
    I believe RRG is back in the hands of Blake Meredith... I believe he sold it and then eventually bought it back. He'll be at RRR this weekend but can be reached here; user id "bamfp". He does a top notch job on everything with really good customer service.

    Christian

    PS
    From my experience a 4.7 seems like it's usually the best "all around" gear for most FWD Honda's. I know it worked fine for my EF CRX Si at everything from VIR to CMP to Road Atlanta and even at Daytona.
    Christian in FL | Something white with Honda on the valve cover...
    FASTtech Limited- DL1, Schroth, & Recaro Goodness
    LTB Motorsports- The Cheapest Place for Momo
    TrackSpeed Motorsports- OMP, Racetech, & Driver Gear

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Limited info I've gotten back, 4.7 vs 4.9 becomes a tradeoff on which corners are in "the wrong gear"....it is a tradeoff.

    4.9 Civic/CRX works at ORP and Mid Ohio.

    IDEALLY (deep wallet!) you should have both depending on the track and driver. But I'm sure everyone can afford a spare $2000+ tranny just to test a different FD ratio.
    BoneSpec Transmissions
    Honda D-series tranny specialist

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Warwick, New York
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Actually if your motor is working well I have found that the 4.5 gearset is faster since you don't run out of gear in the middle of a corner especially at 2 in L/R or the downhill left at Summit

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    743

    Default

    So, it's really quite easy, you just need one of each!
    Ed Funk
    NER ITA CRX, ITB Civic, ITC CRX (wanna buy a Honda?)
    Smart as a horse, hung like Einstein!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunnyside, NY
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    Ed, you are so smart! sounds like a 4.7 is the way to go - redline (7800) in 4th will be about 122. Having a spare tranny is in the plans but until 2010-11.

    Jimmyc thank you for the links! Expensive yet it looks like it's worth the money

    Xian - no word from Blake on whether he could deliver an airdam - I just had to cancel my check.
    Demetrius Mossaidis aka 'Mickey' #12 ITA NESCCA
    '92 Honda Civic Si
    STFU and "Then write a letter. www.crbscca.com"
    2013 ITA NARRC Champion and I have not raced since.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    184

    Default

    only one I trust for D series tranny gearing

    http://www.zealautowerks.com/transcalc.php

    Why? Because I fixed the wrong info that was copied off my 1999 webpage.

    I'm flattered.....not really.

    I figured out the casting codes....
    Last edited by bonespec; 04-26-2009 at 02:06 AM.
    BoneSpec Transmissions
    Honda D-series tranny specialist

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Warwick, New York
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Unfortunatly what your missing in the equation is that these motors don't make any power or torque at 7800 rpm's the torque falls off way below 7000 and the max hp is in the 6500-6800 range, so running a motor up that high will actually make you go slower. Thus the 4.5 ratio.

    D Series Transmissions only need a few things to work well for a long time (assuming a street car rebuild) a) new syncro's, and bearing set, b) a Quaiffe or compatable diff., c) 4.5 4.7 ring & pinion, d) mobil 1 redcap (50wt) motor oil changed after every 3rd race.

    Get the right parts for the right year gearbox and forget all the chatter about trick this or that, micro-polishing anything, and carbon fiber performance parts. Just get quaility oem compatable parts assemble it correctly and maintenance it.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Pickerington, Ohio
    Posts
    760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Blaney View Post
    Unfortunatly what your missing in the equation is that these motors don't make any power or torque at 7800 rpm's the torque falls off way below 7000 and the max hp is in the 6500-6800 range, so running a motor up that high will actually make you go slower. Thus the 4.5 ratio....
    My ITA built D16Z6 dyno graph would suggest that might not always be the case...
    Matt Downing
    1995 Honda Civic EX Coupe - ITA
    Ohio Valley Region, SCCA

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Warwick, New York
    Posts
    941

    Default

    The 18 ITA legal D16 motors I built are the basis for the numbers. Remember your still running a stock cam, stock compression, and stock heads, so there is no justification for the extra rpm's. If your running a modified motor with more compression, breathing and modified cam than the higher rpms are warranted. Even with ecu mapping and all that it still gets down to breathing.

    But who knows maybe you just have a good motor.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bonespec View Post
    Limited info I've gotten back, 4.7 vs 4.9 becomes a tradeoff on which corners are in "the wrong gear"....it is a tradeoff.

    4.9 Civic/CRX works at ORP and Mid Ohio.

    IDEALLY (deep wallet!) you should have both depending on the track and driver. But I'm sure everyone can afford a spare $2000+ tranny just to test a different FD ratio.
    There is an easier solution now that IT rules allow cars that have 14" OEM wheel diameters to run 15". I chose a 4.929 final drive (GEAR-X). At small tracks I run my 14" wheels (225/50), while at large tracks (only Road America for me in the Midwest) I run 15" wheels (225/50). With the 15" wheels it is the equivalent of a 4.723 final drive, perfect. This is the B18A engine, so my choice may not be perfect for your application, but the idea is the same.

    This did produce some fender clearance issues for me in both the front and rear, but nothing that wasn't resolved with some custom fender rolling.
    Jared Cromas
    2012-2010 & 2008 Midwestern Council ITA Champion
    2008 Midwestern Council Driver of the Year
    SCSCC Race Steward
    #111 FP/ST '90 Gold/Blk Acura Integra

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    142

    Default

    I completly dissagree with Tom B.

    Sounds like he is thinking of a d16a6 which is VERY different then the d16z6...

    Also there is no "perfect FD", like he claims. Really it is completly track dependant which is why it is important to look at the tracks you run and figure it out from there.

    For me 4.9 was amazing and worked great at the two tracks i run at. Plus, another benifit to gearing IMO, is minimizing the gear shifts. This was also accomplish for me with the 4.9.

    But i could see at different tracks were the 4.7 would be better..

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Pickerington, Ohio
    Posts
    760

    Default

    Tom B. has a reputation for building VERY good motors. I know he knows what he is talking about. I'm guessing the 4.5 FD comment was meant as the all around best choice for running a single gearbox. I love my 4.9, but have been places where I'd rather have the 4.7 or even my OEM 4.25?... Multiple boxes would be the way to go, but this is club racing and having the 'best' choice for the tracks you run is more like what people have. I run mostly at Mid-Ohio and have found the 4.9 keeps me in 3-4-5 and I'm shifting 1/2 as many times a lap as running the stock FD.

    Thanks!

    Matt
    Matt Downing
    1995 Honda Civic EX Coupe - ITA
    Ohio Valley Region, SCCA

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Warwick, New York
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Thanks Matt, your exactly right. Most club racers don't have a huge budget, and have to build a car for the area they race. The first CRX I had came with a 4.9, and for the tracks I ran it seemed too tight, and I would be shifting at inappropriate points on the track. I went to a 4.7 which was better but still was tight in 2 at L/R and or out of the boot at the Glen. The stock 4.2 was actually very very good at Pocono, but that was about all. When I got hooked up with the 4.5 from Gear-X it seemed to work better than the others.
    Also as you indicted a lot has to do with skill, driving style, and car setup, so if you want to go as fast as you can you have to experiment not only with gears, but with wild swings of suspension settings until you find what works for you.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by downingracing View Post
    Tom B. has a reputation for building VERY good motors. I know he knows what he is talking about. I'm guessing the 4.5 FD comment was meant as the all around best choice for running a single gearbox. I love my 4.9, but have been places where I'd rather have the 4.7 or even my OEM 4.25?... Multiple boxes would be the way to go, but this is club racing and having the 'best' choice for the tracks you run is more like what people have. I run mostly at Mid-Ohio and have found the 4.9 keeps me in 3-4-5 and I'm shifting 1/2 as many times a lap as running the stock FD.

    Thanks!

    Matt
    While that could very well be true, it looks like all of his experience is on a D16a6

    Which is a COMPLETELY different motor then the D16z6

    And then he throws out a 7800rpm limit that i didn't see any one talking about, nor is that what it is set at on the trans graph.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •