Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: 2009: Kumho vs. Hankook vs. Hoosier vs. BFG... fight!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Ron Cortez is the best tire guy on earth!!! I'd trust him on his datas on the Hankooks. I would probably go with the Hankooks based on what your requirements are (price/grip/durability).

    One thing to consider though......considering how much money you've invested or will invest into the car, would you want to have that investment limited by your tire choice? It always helps me to put my mind frame on race weekends where I can recall instances where I wish I had spent a little more to get that little edge.

    Ed Chang
    SFR ITS GSRs

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    366

    Default

    Anybody have experience with the Nitto NT01? They also offer a 225/45/15 and priced right. Plus you can get them from www.discounttire.com for free shipping. These tires seem to be popular in NASA and with the open track crowd. I seem to remember them doing well in a Grassroots Motorsports comparo.

    The fact that Kumho doesn't offer a 225/45x15 to me would be a turn off if I needed and can use that tire size. I am not sure that it would be fair to compare the Kumho 205/50 to a 225 from the other manufacturers. That said, I would NEVER turn down really cheap or Free tires if it means I can get track time.

    BTW I drive on Kumhos and like them. I can afford them and they drive predictably. I have beaten Hoosiers with them - twice last year at HPT.
    Scott Peterson
    KC Region
    83 RX7
    STU #17

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Thanks Ed & others.

    My car is nowhere near "built to the hilt" yet so I'm not overly concerned about being tire-limited, but it'd be nice to start out with tires I can grow into for the next couple of years.

    Scott, I ran the Nitto NT-01s on my race-prepped Evo 8. Nice sticky durable tires, overall about the same level of grip as the Kumho Victoracers but a bit less "peaky" and more consistent performance throughout their life. A modest step up from the RA1s, I think. Rumor was that they have the same compound as the RA1 successor, i.e. what's called the R888 today. I ran a couple sets of Victoracers on my Evo and they had a nasty way of wearing very unevenly; shaving might have helped but then why not go for the V710s.

    In brief, NT-01s are nice but not in the same league as the semi-slick DOTs.
    Last edited by vtluu; 02-10-2009 at 11:55 PM.
    Viet-Tam Luu (a.k.a. "Tam")
    Director, SCCA San Francisco Region
    2011 SFR-SCCA ITS Champion
    #12 ITS (1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata)
    #12 STU (2003 Mitsubishi Evo 8)

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    588

    Default

    Tam, Go with the Hoosier R6 SM 205 50 15. It is cheaper by a bunch and works great. Fast & Lasts!
    Mac Spikes
    Cresson, TX (Home of "The Original" MotorSport Ranch)
    "To hell with you Gen. Sheridan...I 'll take Texas!"

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lateapex911 View Post
    Sizes? Cost will undoubtedly be high..
    Not sure yet but they have always been slightly lower than The Purple.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lateapex911 View Post
    I have zero experience with the kuhmo. Here's why:

    They are slower than the Hoosier by all accounts.
    They don't last as long as the Toyo, by most accounts.

    So, they seem to be a compomise. And they offer(ed) decent contigency.
    all tires are a compromise jake, it's just a matter of where the mfg's want to make that compromise.

    the last time i drove on hoosiers was maybe some R3S04s or 05s, so i can't really say from experience if the 710s are slower than the new hoosiers. i do think some clarification is needed here though....i would REALLY hesitate to say the hoosiers are faster than the v710 in a qualifying situation, and i think depending on driving style, car type, and car setup the V710 can be as fast as the hoosier at least for a while. there are plenty of AS guys who do actually choose the kumho and prefer it to the hoosier.

    the toyo thing is all smoke and mirrors. in order to really get maximum performance out of the toyo you have to shave it down so far that it's only useful for a couple weekends, and even then it's an inferior tire to the other three in everything but initial cost.
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    The RS06 is an amazing tire. Great grip and much improved longevity over the earlier versions. 3 race weekends is very doable.

    I say that knowing nothing about the Hankook, since our local vendor does not carry them and I heard supply is 'difficult" to say teh least. With a Hoosier, if I need one in a pinch, or if I need 4 in a pinch, I head over to the App Tire guys and get them. That simple. That's worth a lot to me, and something you (the OP) should consider when making a tire choice.

    Andy, will the new Goodyear tire be available in 15" sizes?
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Spin- I'm far from an expert, but I have always tied to aim for my colds to get me to an optimum hot pressure. I ran Kooks last year, but Hoosiers before that, and IIRC the gurus like Phil of Phils Tire Service recommended in the 38 hot vicinity. Different tracks required different starting pressures to get there, but 7-8 pounds build was typical.
    Last edited by lateapex911; 02-11-2009 at 01:13 AM.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colchester, CT, USA
    Posts
    2,120

    Default

    As Jake did, I ran my fastest laps on Hankooks. I even ran Hoosiers one weekend and Kooks the next. I found them to be much more consistant than the Hoosiers. A little more forgiving.

    But they can be hard to find.......... *&%^$#@*!!
    Jeff L

    ITA Miata



    2010 NARRC Champion

    2007 NERRC Championship, 2nd place
    2008 NARRC Championship, 2nd place
    2009 NARRC Championship, 2nd place

  10. #30

    Default

    If you are learning as a driver I would reccomend just choosing a a consistant and inexpensive tire such as the TOYO. Stay with the same tire and develope your driving skill. Eventually, when you are driving to the limits of what the tire and car can handle, try some other makes of tire and feel for yourself the difference.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Kevin, thanks but that's missing the point. If I wanted cheap/consistent tires/car I would have stayed in Spec Piņata.

    Of course I'm still learning as a driver. I'm always learning. Has anybody here stoppped learning? I've "learned" past the point where stickier tires are beneficial for me, really!

    Anyway after I factor in the cost of shaving, they're not actually cheaper than the Kumhos or BFGs are for me as I can get the latter two at discounted prices.
    Last edited by vtluu; 02-11-2009 at 09:21 AM.
    Viet-Tam Luu (a.k.a. "Tam")
    Director, SCCA San Francisco Region
    2011 SFR-SCCA ITS Champion
    #12 ITS (1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata)
    #12 STU (2003 Mitsubishi Evo 8)

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    North Olmsted, Ohio
    Posts
    519

    Default

    haha. ofcourse free tires are the best tires. LOL
    But I run a 1990 Honda Civic Si in ITA, and Ive found the Kumho V710's to be a pretty damn good tire. Good performance for the price. I havent tried the Hoosier's (mainly cause im a kid, and im racing on a shoe string budget, so I dont want to spend more than i have to for tires)
    Last year I used 205/50/15 V710's
    This year im switching wheels and tires to 205/55/14. mainly cause the price of the 205/50/15 are a lot more than the 205/55/14.
    But to any budget minded racer (and I think we all mostly are) The Kumho is the best bang for the buck (in my opinion):026:

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Brunswick, Oh
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lateapex911 View Post
    As far as contingencies, many companies make it hard to collect....not impossible, but they aren't looking to make it super easy. They get most of the press from offering the money, not from paying out. It's advertising for them.
    Kumho usually sends the Kuhmo bucks 2 weeks after I send in the results. They are good for 90 days. I'll call and order the tires from The Tire Rack and I'll send the Kuhmo bucks with the invoice number and they'll cedit my card. Didn't pay for tires last year. Only shipping. Looks like this year may be different with them lowering the payout.
    ITC #05
    '82 Jetta
    NEOhio
    Shutter-Up Inc.
    Olmsted Auto Care
    Light Doctor

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    queens,ny
    Posts
    491

    Default

    earlier in the year i could not use the hankooks. they would plow. when we got the set up better is when i was able to use the hankooks. the hoosiers seem to let you get away with poor setups.
    at the last race of the year i ran hoosiers on saturday and hankooks on sunday.
    my fastest lap was on the hoosier by 4 tenths. both tires hung with me throughout the 45 minute race.
    Rick Benazic
    All Star Sheet Metal inc.


    ITS Honda prelude #06

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Bang for the buck won't usually get you into the winner's circle. I'd say get the best you can. With proper tire management, it will all be worth while in the end.

  16. #36

    Default

    Unless you are running at the very front, who cares if one tires is a couple tenths faster then another. If you are a full second behind the leader is the extra $200 a set worth it. i think economics and consistancy are more important, unless you are at the front.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevin22 View Post
    If you are a full second behind the leader is the extra $200 a set worth it.
    If it makes me a second faster, then yes.

    If only it was that clear-cut a decision. Thanks everybody for all the helpful replies!
    Viet-Tam Luu (a.k.a. "Tam")
    Director, SCCA San Francisco Region
    2011 SFR-SCCA ITS Champion
    #12 ITS (1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata)
    #12 STU (2003 Mitsubishi Evo 8)

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vtluu View Post
    If it makes me a second faster, then yes.

    If only it was that clear-cut a decision. Thanks everybody for all the helpful replies!
    Actually, aside from my Goodyear preference and pending 2009 availability, it is.

    If you wanna go fast, it's Hooiser. If you want to compromise, then compromise and be fine with it - and go with the Toyo RA1.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    142

    Default

    check out the BFG R1s, they are fast and last a long time.

    I have one (brand new) that i am looking to get rid of because of spec tire issues.

    We found them to be 2.5 seconds faster on a Honda challenge H1 car at thunderhill with the by pass, versus a toyo RA1. That is out of the box running the same everything as the RA1s. And the data was showing that the tires would preform better with a setup more suited to them.

    I know of one SFR SCCA ITA car that made the jump from Hoosiers to hankooks, because they were faster.
    Last edited by jimmyc; 02-19-2009 at 08:22 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •