Results 1 to 20 of 39

Thread: 2009: Kumho vs. Hankook vs. Hoosier vs. BFG... fight!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Unless you are running at the very front, who cares if one tires is a couple tenths faster then another. If you are a full second behind the leader is the extra $200 a set worth it. i think economics and consistancy are more important, unless you are at the front.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevin22 View Post
    If you are a full second behind the leader is the extra $200 a set worth it.
    If it makes me a second faster, then yes.

    If only it was that clear-cut a decision. Thanks everybody for all the helpful replies!
    Viet-Tam Luu (a.k.a. "Tam")
    Director, SCCA San Francisco Region
    2011 SFR-SCCA ITS Champion
    #12 ITS (1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata)
    #12 STU (2003 Mitsubishi Evo 8)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vtluu View Post
    If it makes me a second faster, then yes.

    If only it was that clear-cut a decision. Thanks everybody for all the helpful replies!
    Actually, aside from my Goodyear preference and pending 2009 availability, it is.

    If you wanna go fast, it's Hooiser. If you want to compromise, then compromise and be fine with it - and go with the Toyo RA1.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •