Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Spring Rate advice for ITA Miata

  1. #1

    Default Spring Rate advice for ITA Miata

    Without revealing any personal or team secrets regarding spring rates, is there any particular range of spring rate that works well with the NA Miatas for ITA competition?

    I come from a SOLO back ground and what works well for me there may not in ITA. I'm just trying to get a little feedback to make sure I'm not making a big mistake putting on softer springs from the 700/325lb springs that came on the car.

    Any advice would greatly be appreciated.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    which shocks?
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  3. #3

    Default

    I'm using the Spec Miata Bilsteins that came with the car.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    1.6 or 1.8?
    what sway bars?
    what tires?
    Marcus
    miller-motorsports.com - Its always an Adventure (and woefully outdated)
    1.6 ITE/SPU/ST2 Turbo Miata (in pieces... err progress)

  5. #5

    Default

    1.8L with Eibach Spec Miata 27mm front 15mm rear sway bars, I'll be using Kumho V710s 205/50/15
    Last edited by JohnW8; 01-20-2009 at 01:36 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnW8 View Post
    1.8L with Eibach Spec Miata 27mm front 15mm rear sway bars, I'll be using Kumho V710s 205/50/15
    i have the SM bars as well, but will be using Koni 8041 Race shocks instead. the SM bilsteins can't effectively dampen the higher spring rates, as they are just OEM street shocks from the R-package cars.

    i just bought 850 and 800 to try out for the front, and 400 for the rear. we'll see how it goes.

    if i were you i would go down to like a 700lb front spring (from 750 iirc) and use the SM rear (350?).
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Trav, sm is 700 /325.
    John, what is the goal of changing springs?
    maximize the speed of the car without changing shocks or bars?
    Are you willing to revalve the shocks?

    if we aren't touching the shocks/bars, I would run 650/350.
    If you are willing to play with the shocks, I would look at the ranger Travis is in.

    Properly valved, the bilsteins are okay, just not a adjustable as the koni/JRZ world.
    Marcus
    miller-motorsports.com - Its always an Adventure (and woefully outdated)
    1.6 ITE/SPU/ST2 Turbo Miata (in pieces... err progress)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    i'm with marcus.....with existing shocks i'd go 650/350 given what he posted as correct SM rates. if you're willing to send the bilsteins off for revalving.....then the rates i'm using might work, maybe slightly less.
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  9. #9

    Default

    Thanks for the info guys. I believe the Bilsteins are just not up to the job of the 700lb springs. AS a matter of fact I believe one if not 2 shocks have bad seals in them. I just wasn't sure if the Miata drivers were increasing or decreasing the spring rates compared to SM. I will be changing out suspension soon enough, I just want to get through the DD School at Roebling before I dump more money in the car.

    Thanks!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    in general, we are going up in rate, but we aren't using the sm shocks
    like i said, bilstein can revalve them to make them work at higher rates.

    for posterity, I'm using the following on my 1.6:
    sm 1.6 front bar
    stock 1.8 11mm rear bar
    koni 8041-race
    springs are 800/450

    Marcus
    Marcus
    miller-motorsports.com - Its always an Adventure (and woefully outdated)
    1.6 ITE/SPU/ST2 Turbo Miata (in pieces... err progress)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tuscaloosa, Alabama
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Hey John! Good to see that your car is coming along. These guys sound like they know what they are talking about. Best of luck to you at the RR school.

    -Vincent.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    I crept up on my set-up as well. 850/400 is where I feel I found the best balance and grip without a splitter.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  13. #13

    Default

    What is the advantage to going to higher spring rates?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnW8 View Post
    What is the advantage to going to higher spring rates?
    Less body roll? Was that a trick question?

    Seriously, at some point, there is too much spring for this car. I am just not convinced I have found it yet. I have ceratinly sacrificed wet-weather performance (I can run just as fast in our SM rental cars in the wet) for dry weather grip.

    The issue with this car is that it feels great no matter what you do. With our ITS RX-7's, you know immediatly if you did the wrong thing in terms of set-up. Finding the fast set-up for me is done primarily with the Data and the stopwatch.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    588

    Default

    John, Let me recommend speaking with Shaikh at Fatcat Motorsports in CA. He has done a lot with the Bilstiens. He is a very good source for info on what you are looking at.
    Mac Spikes
    Cresson, TX (Home of "The Original" MotorSport Ranch)
    "To hell with you Gen. Sheridan...I 'll take Texas!"

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Bettencourt View Post
    Less body roll? Was that a trick question?

    Seriously, at some point, there is too much spring for this car. I am just not convinced I have found it yet. I have ceratinly sacrificed wet-weather performance (I can run just as fast in our SM rental cars in the wet) for dry weather grip.

    The issue with this car is that it feels great no matter what you do. With our ITS RX-7's, you know immediatly if you did the wrong thing in terms of set-up. Finding the fast set-up for me is done primarily with the Data and the stopwatch.
    Lower static ride height to gain camber while staying off the bump stops?
    Marcus
    miller-motorsports.com - Its always an Adventure (and woefully outdated)
    1.6 ITE/SPU/ST2 Turbo Miata (in pieces... err progress)

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marcus Miller View Post
    Lower static ride height to gain camber while staying off the bump stops?
    That's why autocrossers use the higher spring rates. I'm thinking as fat as that SM swaybar is there's plenty of roll control. I'm a total noob when it comes to this Road racing stuff and I never imagined there was so much to think about, worry about, set up, configure, tune, tweak etc etc. Maybe I'm overthinking it. I take advice well and learn from trying so this should be fun getting the license. I'll worry about getting faster as my seat time goes up. Thanks for the info.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •