Results 1 to 20 of 61

Thread: Proposed Change to IT Purpose and Intent

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    holy fuckballs.

    It is also the intent of these rules to keep the costs of preparing, maintaining and competing a car in the Improved Touring category to a minimum.
    no way. is it that hard to predict the landslide of requests to allow X stock part be replaced by X aftermarket part in the name of lower cost of maintenance? under the new statements, they'd probably be justified. i don't like this one bit.
    Last edited by tnord; 01-15-2009 at 02:36 PM.
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    734

    Default

    How is limiting the types of cars classed going to restrict spending? If someone wants to build a top-notch 80's econo-box there isn't anything stop them. Heck, the cost to build an RSX isn't much more than the cost to build a CRX.

    Change requests like this absolutely smack of some level of self-interest... what car/class do you race? What's the prep level?

    Christian
    Christian in FL | Something white with Honda on the valve cover...
    FASTtech Limited- DL1, Schroth, & Recaro Goodness
    LTB Motorsports- The Cheapest Place for Momo
    TrackSpeed Motorsports- OMP, Racetech, & Driver Gear

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •