Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Tire contingency

  1. #1

    Default Tire contingency

    I went to the Kumho site and the contingency info is a couple of years old.
    I had meant to put all the stickers on my car and send a photo in, buy some 710's and enjoy the contingency money for 2008, but I never got my stuff together with the move and all.

    However, now I am prepared to buy my next set of tires and I find myself wondering if Kumho will be running the same great program this year (in IT it was 300 for first, 200 for second, 100 for third). I could have a free set of tires a year with this plan. With the economy and car manufacturers pulling out of auto shows, I wasnt sure if 2009 would be the same.

    If they arent, I'll be buying up the last remaining RA-1's as they have served me very well.

    Anybody know?
    Deltona, FL
    Black 1989 Suzuki Swift GTi ITB
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...67003220&hl=en

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    120

    Default

    I would like to know also as we have a double in Jan we plan to attend.
    Carver

    Car Prep, Rentals and full builds.
    Details at http://www.ChrisCarverMotorSports.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Don't know about Kumho, but I would look at Hankook's program as well. $400/1st, $300/2nd, $200/3rd with min of 5 starters... and better tires to boot.
    Earl R.
    240SX
    ITA/ST5

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erlrich View Post
    ... and better tires to boot.
    that's debateable.

    the Kumho contingency forms say like 2005 on them, but i used them in 2007. not sure what the program will be in 2009. if they cancel it, i'll switch to Hankook or Hoosier, and i'll have 5 205/50/15 V710s for sale.
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  5. #5

    Default

    those are big money numbers put up by Hankook!
    And with my move here to Florida, we almost always get 5 or more ITB cars.

    How do the Hankooks stand up to the kumho and RA-1? I'm very familiar with the RA-1...
    I'm downloading the Hankook contingency form and filling it out.
    Is there a contact guy for the southeast?
    Deltona, FL
    Black 1989 Suzuki Swift GTi ITB
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...67003220&hl=en

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tnord
    that's debateable.
    I know - just wanted to see if I could stir up some shit

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbatson4570
    How do the Hankooks stand up to the kumho and RA-1? I'm very familiar with the RA-1...
    As far as comparisons go, I think a lot of it is subjective, but I think there is nearly universal agreement that both the Hankooks and Kumhos are significantly faster than the Toyos. I've used all three, and liked the level of grip with both the V710s and the Z214s. I just had some problems with the Kumhos falling apart (they've probably fixed that problem by now?) so I will stick with the Hankooks. And they seem to stay fast for quite a few heat cycles - I commented to Chris Perera last year after setting my personal best lap time on a set of well-used Hankooks about how impressed I was with them, and he noted that when he had set the new ITA track record the year before he was on 8 heat-cycle Hankooks at the time. The Toyos are known to last forever, but you pay for it in terms of grip.
    Earl R.
    240SX
    ITA/ST5

  7. #7

    Default

    excellent, thanks so much for the info. Sounds like the Hankooks are a no-brainer for me.
    Good tire life, good grip, and possibly free if I place well enough.
    Looks like the contingency form is much like the Kumho. Get the decals and tires on your car, take photos and send in along with necessary forms, and then place in the top three

    Looking to order a set now.

    thx again

    OH, quick question...which compound would you run for a light FWD ITB car? the 70 or 51?
    Last edited by mattbatson4570; 11-26-2008 at 06:00 PM.
    Deltona, FL
    Black 1989 Suzuki Swift GTi ITB
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...67003220&hl=en

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,489

    Default

    in the past, hankook's have been super fast on their first couple cycles, and then continually fall off. i've found the V710 to be an awesome qualifying tire, but in the Kansas August heat, after about 3 or 4 laps they start to get slimy. they're both good and bad for different reasons.

    hankook also has some supply issues.
    Travis Nordwald
    1996 ITA Miata
    KC Region

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Oh, and I did forget to mention the one problem with the Hankooks - supply. They are notorious for being slow getting the new tires to the dealers in time for the first races of the season, and seem to be out-of-stock quite often. If you can find your size in stock, however, you should be good to go. As far as suppliers, Appalachian Tire is an excellent choice in the SE, and Phil's Tire Service has a great reputation in the NE.
    Earl R.
    240SX
    ITA/ST5

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Brunswick, Oh
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Emailed Rudy a Kumho. He said there will be a contingency for '09. Contact him. I'm sure he can forward you the proper forms.
    ITC #05
    '82 Jetta
    NEOhio
    Shutter-Up Inc.
    Olmsted Auto Care
    Light Doctor

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jay05 View Post
    Emailed Rudy a Kumho. He said there will be a contingency for '09. Contact him. I'm sure he can forward you the proper forms.
    Well, I suppose Hankook might be the better one to go with as the money is better?
    Seems the tires are pretty equal in most respects....
    Deltona, FL
    Black 1989 Suzuki Swift GTi ITB
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...67003220&hl=en

  12. #12

    Default

    scratch that...looks like the Hankook 205/55-14's in both compounds are on national backorder.

    Kumho it is
    Deltona, FL
    Black 1989 Suzuki Swift GTi ITB
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...67003220&hl=en

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    63

    Default

    OK... dumb noob question to follow....

    How do Hankook and/or Kummo compare to Hoosier?
    George Bugg
    Huntsville, AL
    ITA CRXsi

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colchester, CT, USA
    Posts
    2,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GBugg View Post
    OK... dumb noob question to follow....

    How do Hankook and/or Kummo compare to Hoosier?

    I've run the Hankook and Hoosiers in back to back weekends. I found the Hankooks much more consistant over the length of the race and aren't as quick to let go. I could feel the Hankooks start to give and could correct where I felt the Hoosiers gave very little warning. I seemed to have an easier time dialing in the set up with the Hankooks too.

    Oh, and I've done all my fastests times on Hankooks.

    However, the supply issue may be their downfall. You would think after three seasons of this they would have figured it out. If I took that long to get it right in my job I would have been fired a long time ago!!
    Jeff L

    ITA Miata



    2010 NARRC Champion

    2007 NERRC Championship, 2nd place
    2008 NARRC Championship, 2nd place
    2009 NARRC Championship, 2nd place

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    532

    Default

    Jeff - Good info, thanks! What sort of optimum pressure differences (if any) did you see, Hankook vs Hoosier?
    Gary Learned
    MiDiv
    Volvo 142E
    http://www.youtube.com/user/denrael

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    384

    Default

    Just an FYI for the regions that aren't blessed with healthy class counts(like me)

    Hankook only pays more if their are 5 or more starters

    If their are 3 or 4 starters Kumho pays more

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    63

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sandro View Post
    Just an FYI for the regions that aren't

    Hankook only pays more if their are 5 or more starters
    The Hankook contingency form says $H150 for the win with 3 starters. 200/100/50 for 4 starters and 400/300/200 for 5 starters.
    George Bugg
    Huntsville, AL
    ITA CRXsi

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    384

    Default

    This is for 1st place

    Starters....Hankook.... Kumho
    ......5 .........$400........ $300
    ......4..........$200.........$300
    ......3..........$150.........$200

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Purcellville, VA USA
    Posts
    902

    Default

    The word on the street is that Rudy is leaving Kumho and that even the Contract Drivers are up in the air right now.
    Chris "The Cat Killer" Childs
    Angry Sheep Motorsports
    810 417 7777
    angrysheepmotorsports.com

    IT,SM,SS,Touring, and Super Touring

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colchester, CT, USA
    Posts
    2,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gary L View Post
    Jeff - Good info, thanks! What sort of optimum pressure differences (if any) did you see, Hankook vs Hoosier?

    I ran about the same pressure. Unfortunately I rarely had anyone to check my pressures on the hankooks so in that regard I can't say if I had them at the optimum. I'll try to dig out my notes when I get home.

    If all the finaincial stuff was the same, I would still take the Hankooks over the Hoosiers.
    Jeff L

    ITA Miata



    2010 NARRC Champion

    2007 NERRC Championship, 2nd place
    2008 NARRC Championship, 2nd place
    2009 NARRC Championship, 2nd place

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •