Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Civic Control Arms

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    28

    Default Civic Control Arms

    Is there a difference between 1988 / 89 Civic front upper control arms and 1990 / 91 arms? I've been told the 1990 / 91 arms have the ball joint seperate from the arm.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    734

    Default

    There's a difference between some of them but I'm not sure what/if there's a rhyme or reason to them. FWIW, I had an 89 that had the ball joint permanently affixed. For my 90 I went ahead and bough new UCA's from Honda... not sure if the ball joint was separate or not.
    Christian in FL | Something white with Honda on the valve cover...
    FASTtech Limited- DL1, Schroth, & Recaro Goodness
    LTB Motorsports- The Cheapest Place for Momo
    TrackSpeed Motorsports- OMP, Racetech, & Driver Gear

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bay City , Mi .
    Posts
    86

    Default Different UCA's .

    I have bought them for both and the aftermarket ones I got for a 90 Civic Si had a seperate ball joint . But the ones I bought for an 88 Civic standard were attached .
    They are diminsionally the same part If I'm not mistaken ?
    Does anyone else have a better idea ?
    Todd Robbins. [email protected]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Correct dimensionally identical...

    When I had my 89, I went to the junkyard and looked until I found a set with separate ball joint and then replaced the ball joint. I didn't think to look at what year the car was
    Christian in FL | Something white with Honda on the valve cover...
    FASTtech Limited- DL1, Schroth, & Recaro Goodness
    LTB Motorsports- The Cheapest Place for Momo
    TrackSpeed Motorsports- OMP, Racetech, & Driver Gear

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    49

    Default

    I have seen them both ways for the same year. I have a set of stock ones with INGALS adjustable ball joints if you are interested. New!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    28

    Default

    How much negative camber could I get with these control arms / ball joints? What do you need to get for them? Thanks.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Adjustable ball joints aren't IT legal... offset bushings only.
    Christian in FL | Something white with Honda on the valve cover...
    FASTtech Limited- DL1, Schroth, & Recaro Goodness
    LTB Motorsports- The Cheapest Place for Momo
    TrackSpeed Motorsports- OMP, Racetech, & Driver Gear

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bay City , Mi .
    Posts
    86

    Default front control arms .

    The amount of - camber you get from a frony control arm without offset bushings is dependent on how much lowering you induce .
    With the IT legal ride height in our 91 ITC civic we were at about -2deg +or- .
    It's been a while since we sold the car though .
    Todd Robbins. [email protected]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tcc1577 View Post
    How much negative camber could I get with these control arms / ball joints? What do you need to get for them? Thanks.
    like Xian said, the ingals adjustable balljoints are not allowed in IT, but for academia's sake, you can get ±3° or so with them from stock at whatever lowering position. the real trick is that they allow a reasonably easy caster adjust, too.

    IT legal offset bushing are hard to get a wrench to, but work well and give you ~±2° caster AND camber. IT questionable slotted UCA mount replacements give you a bit more adjustemnt and are much easier to adjust. Ingals sells all 3 types, IIRC.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •