Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: E36 thoughts? (man!, not much traffic here)...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Dan, if I wasn't clear, I meant 325s only.

    Kirk, I agree -- I am assuming (perhaps wrongly) that the entire OBDI induction system including the manifold (the plenum, etc.) would transfer over. In fact, I suspect it HAS to to use the M50 manifold. Since ECU is now free, shouldn't be an OBDI/II issue with the rest of the harness, etc.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St.Louis, MO USA
    Posts
    150

    Default

    All the E36 325 in ITS/ITR are OBDI and ALL have the same manifold...

    The M50NV (non-VANOS) is 1992 only
    The M50TU is the VANOS model from 1993-1995
    *The above reside on the same spec-line*

    The M52 is the 2.8l OBDII from 1996-1999
    The S50 is the OBDI '95 M3 3.0l
    The S52 is the OBDII 96-99 M3 3.2l

    The M52TU is the E46 2.5l (99-00 323)
    The M52B28 is the E46/Z3 2.8l
    The M54 is the E46/Z3 3.0l
    ALL of these are OBDII and Double VANOS

    FWIW...The gains are not 15-20hp when swapping on an OBDII car...those are Dinan/Conforti type numbers for sure...there is a gain of course...but to realize greater gains requires larger injectors and a larger HFM (MAF) neither of which woulkd be IT legal anyway.

    This is the exact reason I said the '95 M3 should be allowed in ITR...1995 ONLY uses the same 17.5# injectors as the 325's and the same 3" MAF (as does the 96-99 M3 FWIW). With the 17.5# injectors and no MAF swap the power differences will be minimal... .5l greater capacity and slightly hotter cams.
    Mark Andrews
    ITS '92 BMW 325is
    St. Louis

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buldogge View Post
    All the E36 325 in ITS/ITR are OBDI and ALL have the same manifold...

    The M50NV (non-VANOS) is 1992 only
    The M50TU is the VANOS model from 1993-1995
    *The above reside on the same spec-line*

    The M52 is the 2.8l OBDII from 1996-1999
    The S50 is the OBDI '95 M3 3.0l
    The S52 is the OBDII 96-99 M3 3.2l

    The M52TU is the E46 2.5l (99-00 323)
    The M52B28 is the E46/Z3 2.8l
    The M54 is the E46/Z3 3.0l
    ALL of these are OBDII and Double VANOS
    Oh, so close! Until you got to 1999 you were doing great.

    M52B28: E36 2.8L from '96-'99 E36 328i and '97-'98 Z3 2.8.
    M52tuB25: E46 323i and '99+ Z3 2.3
    M52tuB28: E46 328i and '99+ Z3 2.8

    M54B25: E46 325i and Z3 2.5i
    M54B30: E46 330i and Z3 3.0i
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St.Louis, MO USA
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Looks to me like we're in agreement...

    I just left out some of the Z3's...which is kinda funny given I'm an MCoupe guy...or maybe that's just it...MCoupe snobbery!

    Quote Originally Posted by JoshS View Post
    Oh, so close! Until you got to 1999 you were doing great.

    M52B28: E36 2.8L from '96-'99 E36 328i and '97-'98 Z3 2.8.
    M52tuB25: E46 323i and '99+ Z3 2.3
    M52tuB28: E46 328i and '99+ Z3 2.8

    M54B25: E46 325i and Z3 2.5i
    M54B30: E46 330i and Z3 3.0i
    Mark Andrews
    ITS '92 BMW 325is
    St. Louis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buldogge View Post
    Looks to me like we're in agreement...

    I just left out some of the Z3's...which is kinda funny given I'm an MCoupe guy...or maybe that's just it...MCoupe snobbery!
    The real correction wasn't the Z3s, it was that the M52B28 was an E46 motor ... it was really an E36 motor.

    I was just including the Z3s for completeness, especially because a lot of people don't realize that they have both E36 and E46 engines.
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St.Louis, MO USA
    Posts
    150

    Default

    I unfortunately simply left the TU out after the M52 in the second listing as I was following the M52TU 2.5l.

    To clarify...M52B28 is E36 Single VANOS 2.8l and M52TUB28 is E46 Double VANOS 2.8l

    Now we've have officially bored everyone...

    Quote Originally Posted by JoshS View Post
    The real correction wasn't the Z3s, it was that the M52B28 was an E46 motor ... it was really an E36 motor.

    I was just including the Z3s for completeness, especially because a lot of people don't realize that they have both E36 and E46 engines.
    Mark Andrews
    ITS '92 BMW 325is
    St. Louis

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Tijeras, NM
    Posts
    579

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoshS View Post
    The real correction wasn't the Z3s, it was that the M52B28 was an E46 motor ... it was really an E36 motor.

    I was just including the Z3s for completeness, especially because a lot of people don't realize that they have both E36 and E46 engines.
    And yet it was classed in ITR based on the E36 (single VANOS) numbers.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GKR_17 View Post
    And yet it was classed in ITR based on the E36 (single VANOS) numbers.
    I wasn't involved, but I don't think that's true.

    Looks to me like 193hp (double vanos engine) * 1.3 (30% multiplier) * 11.25 - 25lbs adjuster (no idea why, the other Z3s got -50 lbs) comes out to 2798, rounded to 2800, which is the listed weight.

    If I start with 189hp (single vanos engine) I can't come up with any math that comes out to 2800.
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •