Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Cage Tubing Dimension Changes for 2008?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Amy View Post
    James, his cage doesn't meet IT specs, and he needs a fuel cell and fire system to be able to run EProd...

    What about ITE or SPU or any of the other myriad "catch all" classes? Can't you find one where you can lower the minimum weight just to "get out there"?

    GA
    But, he doesn't need a fuel cell if: the tank's plastic, and located between the front and rear axle and frame rails. Josh and I don't need cell's and most cars made over the past 20 years or so don't need cells. The one e-30 I looked at had the tank under the rear seat, so the location is right... the question is the tank plastic?

    I think the NCR has ITO/ITU, check the regional site...

    (Oh, I see you're in Md, never mind about NCR then)
    Last edited by Z3_GoCar; 10-08-2008 at 03:52 PM.
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    12

    Default

    I found the ITE rules at NESCCA. (SPO doesn't seem to fit me: it's basically a class for retired pro race cars.)

    "...the ITE rules and guidelines are that ALL VEHICLES MUST:

    - Meet (at minimum) current Improved Touring safety specifications."

    I can see by the wording that this class is intended for cars that pass the tech inspection of other sanctioning bodies. Since there is no "GCR weight" for an ITE car, the rational way to interpret the cage rule is that a 2700+ lb car needs 1.750" tubing.

    So, I'd still be ineligible because my car is probably over that weight. I haven't weighed it so I don't know...

    This is absurd. WTFE. :mad:
    Scott

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    alexandria, va
    Posts
    851

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottL View Post
    I found the ITE rules at NESCCA. (SPO doesn't seem to fit me: it's basically a class for retired pro race cars.)

    "...the ITE rules and guidelines are that ALL VEHICLES MUST:

    - Meet (at minimum) current Improved Touring safety specifications."

    I can see by the wording that this class is intended for cars that pass the tech inspection of other sanctioning bodies. Since there is no "GCR weight" for an ITE car, the rational way to interpret the cage rule is that a 2700+ lb car needs 1.750" tubing.

    So, I'd still be ineligible because my car is probably over that weight. I haven't weighed it so I don't know...

    This is absurd. WTFE. :mad:
    ITE rules vary from region to region. the DC region rules are on wdcr-scca.org. quote frm them,
    "All vehicles must meet minimum, current SCCA safety specifications of IT classes. All vehicles must possess an SCCA Vehicle logbook and rollcage number. "

    bummer, but the car weight would have to be defined by the rules of the class the car was built for. nasa spece30, nor bmwcca kp class are listed as eligible classes, but i ran as a bmwcca jp car for a season a few years ago.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Southfield, MI
    Posts
    564

    Default

    You'll want to check the latest rukes for prod fuel tanks. I think they dropped the plastic part. Any tank between the axles is OK.
    Tim

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •