Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 77

Thread: VIR -- What the Hell?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default VIR -- What the Hell?

    Runs groups:

    Group 2: SM, SRF, ITS?????

    Group 4: ITR, ITA, IT7, ITB, ITC, SRX7, SSM, SSB, SSC

    That's just messed up. We get stuck in with the SRFs, which are basically open wheel cars I can't see and that I beat down the straights, and then who will take you two wide in the essess (something ITS can't do, mostly)?

    This is crazy. I've sent an e-mail to Ginny.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Asheville, NC US
    Posts
    1,626

    Default

    Waste of time Jeff. I tried last time and they would not budge on race groups. We can watch the SRF--SM carnage from the cheap seats.
    Steve Eckerich
    ITS 18 Speedsource RX7
    ITR RX8 (under construction)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Last time at VIR back in the Spring they said they would reorganize with enough warning. Problem is, Ginny said they would change weeks before the event and then at the event they wouldn't budge.

    About the only way to get them to change is to not show and let them know about it. I hate running with SRFs, they hate running with ITS cars, so why can't the steward understand this?

    Groupings should be:

    Group 2: SM, SRF, ITB, ITC, SRX7, SSM, SSB, SSC

    Group 4: ITR, ITS, ITA, IT7, maybe ITB to even them out

    Jeff, put me on the list of drivers who won't race with this grouping. I'll send out emails to Steve and some others.

    Ron

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    My bad. A split start was requested at the last race. We were told it would happen. Then on the race event weekend that was retracted.

    I suppose we can go for a split start again. Who is the Steward?

    Ron

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Regional Grouping Rule #1: SM and SSM are never to be together, 'lest you lose a couple dozen potential additional entries...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    and A and SM apparently....

    Steve, I hear ya. We raised this before and simply asked for a split start back in May and despite EvERY ITS driver being favor, were told no by the steward.

    I know you are ok with the SRFs -- they race a lot like your car! LOL...for me, they are hard to see and do crazy stuff in the essesses that we can't do.

    It's just hard for me to understand why NCR doesn't stick with the default SARRC run groups of S/A//7/R. Hacking us off from all other production based cars on non-slicks to run with SRFs and SMs is crazy.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Asheville, NC US
    Posts
    1,626

    Default

    Remember this is the Production Festival weekend and they get their own run group. Usually SRF runs with them. I am also running the EP car so I would get them either way. The Prod group will be very large so they have to go somewhere.
    Steve Eckerich
    ITS 18 Speedsource RX7
    ITR RX8 (under construction)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Oh yes, I am aware of that.....

    Don't get me wrong, it's good to see the Prod cars come out like that, but when they disrupt normal race groups at a regional weekend, I get a bit perturbed.

    Quote Originally Posted by seckerich View Post
    Remember this is the Production Festival weekend and they get their own run group. Usually SRF runs with them. I am also running the EP car so I would get them either way. The Prod group will be very large so they have to go somewhere.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seckerich View Post
    Remember this is the Production Festival weekend and they get their own run group. Usually SRF runs with them.
    Have any idea why SRF isn't running with them for the Goblin's Go?

    R

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Asheville, NC US
    Posts
    1,626

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Earp View Post
    Have any idea why SRF isn't running with them for the Goblin's Go?

    R
    They were promised their own run group if they could provide the car counts. They do and it will be a big group. Some drivers are coming from as far as California to run this race.
    Steve Eckerich
    ITS 18 Speedsource RX7
    ITR RX8 (under construction)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seckerich View Post
    They were promised their own run group if they could provide the car counts. They do and it will be a big group. Some drivers are coming from as far as California to run this race.
    Wow. Pretty cool.

    Will make note of the car counts. That way we can petition a to give ITS/ITR their a run group on a National Weekend if we get the car counts. Tit for tat and all that. No, seriously, that is fair and I can see the reasoning.

    I just hope they will do a split start for us IT'ers.

    Ron
    Last edited by Ron Earp; 09-30-2008 at 02:34 PM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffYoung View Post
    Oh yes, I am aware of that.....

    Don't get me wrong, it's good to see the Prod cars come out like that, but when they disrupt normal race groups at a regional weekend, I get a bit perturbed.

    Like the ARRC?

    MM
    Marcus
    miller-motorsports.com - Its always an Adventure (and woefully outdated)
    1.6 ITE/SPU/ST2 Turbo Miata (in pieces... err progress)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    195

    Default

    I have my own horror stories about running with Spec Wreckers, so "I feel your pain". But what I find astounding is that they moved ITS, and didn't move ITR along with them.

    And believe me, I'm not trying to anger the "R" guys (*cough* Rickey *cough*). Could this have anything to do with the fact that the ITS lap record is faster than ITR???

    (just stirrin' the pot.... )
    Mike Spencer
    NC Region
    ITA/7 RX-7 #60
    IT7R RX-7 #37 (build in process)
    1990 Classic Red Miata
    2004 "Winning Blue" RX-8

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Goldsboro,N.C. U.S.A.
    Posts
    485

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Spencer View Post
    I have my own horror stories.(*cough* Rickey *cough*) )
    Mike,

    ....... Maybe you should see a Doctor about that cough ......:eek:

    ....... Like my edited edition? .....LOL

    ....... Rickey T.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    195

    Default

    Rickey,

    Remember? I promised I wouldn't tell any horror stories about you! ;-)

    Still, wouldn't you rather be running with those invisible fast guys???
    Mike Spencer
    NC Region
    ITA/7 RX-7 #60
    IT7R RX-7 #37 (build in process)
    1990 Classic Red Miata
    2004 "Winning Blue" RX-8

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    682

    Default

    I can understand wanting to make the prod guys the boogeyman on this one, but if the IT guys take an honest look at the schedule the race groupings really are a function of trying to get 4 separate IT races in during one race weekend: a SARRC, 2 ECRs, and a CCPS. Dropping an ECR or a CCPS race would probably result in much better IT race groupings simply because then the SRFs could have their own race group.

    When we approached the NCR board, all we asked for was ONE class to be moved out of our normal race group (SRF) for ONE race during the year so we could create an incentive for folks to come out for a special year ending event. We were granted this and there has been a 400% increase in prod cars at this event in just 4 short years. Last year we had over 50 prod cars on the false grid, making this THE biggest SCCA production car race in the country of the year. We pay for the special trophies, t-shirts, party, and raffle prizes for the participants ourselves (the prod racers). The net to the region was an increase of several thousand $$$ in entry fees for no investment on their part.

    Thanks for your understanding and best of racing luck to everyone that weekend!

    Mark Coffin
    lesser 1/2 of the Production Car Festival committee (my wife is the better 1/2!)
    Last edited by racer14itc; 10-03-2008 at 11:41 PM.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Mark, I enjoy seeing the Prod cars come out and think the Prod Fest is a good thing. But you have to remember this is a regional weekend, and in my (humble) opinion regional classes should be the focus. Lopping off one IT class to run with SRF and SM to make this work.....well, I respect the decision of NCR leadership (they are all good folks) but it gives me serious pause about running the race with that group. I'm sure you understand the reasons why.

    That said, I've asked for a split start for ITS cars and if we get it, I'll be fine with the situation. The problem is when this happened in May, we were told to wait to ask for teh split start on race day, and every ITS driver present did so. We were then told we had waited too long.

    I have no idea why there are two ECRs and a Cup race this weekend. I agree it is a lot of racing on a two day weekend. I also don't think the appropriate solution is to take one IT group -- admittedly mine -- and stick them in with SRFs and SMs. But so it goes.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Post

    Jeff, who is the steward for the meet? I'll write a letter/email to that person informing them of the situation last May and how we (IT drivers) want to avoid that again. I'm sure the SRF folks don't want this mess either. I was around a couple racing for position in May and I'm sure I screwed them up - but I had little choice, I had a ITS car racing me for position as well and couldn't very well give up in the middle of it.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, TN
    Posts
    20

    Default

    At a nominal 1700 pounds, I'd hardly call an SRF and "open wheel car". When Sports Renault started in the 80s, we in CSR disliked running with them because they took odd lines and were built like tanks.

    In any case, at the SIC, they split started the SRFs and the small IT cars. It worked pretty well. By the time I got lapped the SRFs were pretty strung out.

    P.S. If you can't see an SRF coming, you aren't looking in your mirrors or watching the flags enough.
    Chuck
    ITC Honda Civic
    Green fueled, four on the floor, all terrain mustang

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    I would respectfully disagree. They are 1000 lbs lighter than most ITS cars, and under that body work they are essentially an open wheel car.

    As far as "seeing them coming" -- in an S car you are running similar times to most of them, they just make speed different than you. They don't pass you and then move on, way on, as if you were in a C car doing 100 mph tops. They pass in places we don't, take lines we don't, and are impossible to see when they are on your quarter panel.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •